Socioeconomic influence on treatment with liothyronine and desiccated thyroid extract in Denmark

Introduction

High compared with low educational level increases the odds of starting levothyroxine (L-T4) with a normal thyroid-stimulating hormone - the mechanism is most likely patient request. The use of liothyronine (L-T3) and desiccated thyroid extract (DTE) is also speculated to be initiated at patients' request. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate if educational level influences treatment with L-T3 and DTE.

Material and methods

In this register-based cross-sectional study, we included all Danish citizens ≥30 years with redeemed prescription of L-T4, L-T3, or DTE during 2017-2020. We defined educational levels as short, medium, and long (<10 years, 10-12 years, and above 12 years, respectively). The association between educational level and treatment with LT3 or DTE vs only LT4 was analyzed in logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex.

Results

We included 154,360 individuals using thyroid medication of whom 3829 were treated with L-T3 (2.48%) and 430 with DTE (0.28%). The usage was highest among women (3.15%) and the age group 40-49 (5.6%). Longer education compared with short increased the odds of being treated with DTE or L-T3 (medium education odds ratio (OR) 1.61 (95% CI 1.50-1.8) and long education OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.79-2.13)). Test for trend: OR: 1.37 (95% CI 1.31-1.42). Adjustment for other covariates did not affect the results substantially.

Conclusion

Persons with a longer compared to a shorter education are more often treated with either DTE or L-T3, and the usage of these drugs is limited to less than 3% of thyroid hormone users.

Association of Levothyroxine Treatment and Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies with Antidepressant Use: A Danish Population-Based Longitudinal Study

Background: Subjects receiving levothyroxine (LT4) treatment have increased prevalence of depression, anxiety, and antidepressant use, but whether the underlying mechanism relates to thyroid autoimmunity is still unclarified. Methods: This is a population-based longitudinal study. Baseline biochemical and questionnaire data from the Danish General Suburban Population Study (GESUS) in 2010-2013 were linked with individual-level longitudinal data in national health registries. The aim was to investigate the associations between thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAbs) and LT4 treatment, separately and through interaction, and at least one redeemed prescription for antidepressants. Logistic and Cox regression were used to evaluate initiation of antidepressant use before and after the baseline examination in GESUS, respectively. All exposures and covariates were fixed at the date of baseline examination. Thyroid autoimmunity was defined as serum TPOAbs >60 U/mL. Adjustments included sex, age, education, income, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking, and alcohol. Sensitivity analyses were performed for missing variables, exclusion of lithium use, exclusion of thyroid surgery, and conservative definitions for LT4 treatment and antidepressant use requiring at least two prescriptions. Results: We included 12,894 individuals, of whom 2353 (18%) had "past or current" antidepressant use at baseline, leaving 10,541 individuals at risk for incident antidepressant use after baseline. The median follow-up was 7.8 years during which 783 individuals (7.4% of 10,541 individuals) had incident antidepressant use. TPOAb positivity was not associated with "past or current" (odds ratio [OR] 0.90 [confidence interval, CI 0.78-1.03], p = 0.13) nor incident antidepressant use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02 [CI 0.83-1.25], p = 0.88). LT4 treatment was associated with increased "past or current" antidepressant use (OR 1.33 [CI 1.10-1.62], p = 0.004) and increased incident antidepressant use (HR 1.38 [CI 1.03-1.85], p = 0.03). There were no interactions between the effects of TPOAb positivity and LT4 treatment on the use of antidepressants in logistic (p = 0.87) or Cox regression models (p = 0.82). Sensitivity analyses were robust, except that incident use of at least two redeemed antidepressant prescriptions was not statistically significant. Conclusions: LT4 treatment, but not TPOAb positivity, was associated with increased prevalent or incident antidepressant use with at least one prescription. Our findings do not support that thyroid autoimmunity is an important factor for antidepressant use in patients receiving LT4 treatment.

Risk of over- and under- treatment with levothyroxine in primary care in Copenhagen, Denmark

OBJECTIVE

A decrease over time in thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels when initiating levothyroxine (L-T4) therapy for hypothyroidism has been reported, where treatment most often is initiated with TSH levels below 10 mIU/L. The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether this lower TSH threshold resulted in an increased number of overtreated patients.

DESIGN AND METHOD

Retrospective cohort study comprising inhabitants in Copenhagen had TSH measurements requested by general practitioners which led to a new prescription of L-T4 between 2001 and 2012. Over- and under- treatment were defined as TSH <0.1 mIU/L or above 10 mIU/mL, respectively, in three consecutive measurements. Data were analyzed by Aalen-Johansen estimators and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In total, 14 533 initiations of L-T4 were included in the study. The cumulative risk of being over- or undertreated was 4.7 and 7.4% after 10 years. The hazard of overtreatment was higher among women, younger adults, and with lower initial TSH levels. The hazard of overtreatment decreased over the time period from 2001 to 2012. Among overtreated individuals, the chance of returning to a normal TSH was about 55% after 10 years. In 18% of the cases, L-T4 therapy was initiated on TSH levels less than 5 mIU/L.

CONCLUSION

Although a still decreasing threshold for initiating L-T4 therapy is known, the risk of overtreatment (and undertreatment) was low and lessened in the period 2001-2012 among Danish primary care patients. Nevertheless, as many as 18% were started on L-T4 with normal TSH levels.

Changes in Prescription Routines for Treating Hypothyroidism Between 2001 and 2015: An Observational Study of 929,684 Primary Care Patients in Copenhagen

Background: Increased public attention toward health and quality-of-life issues has led to more intensified screening for various medical conditions, including hypothyroidism. A falling serum thyrotropin (s-TSH) at initiation of levothyroxine (LT4) treatment has been reported in the United Kingdom between 2001 and 2009, indicating a falling TSH threshold, which may lead to less benefit from therapy and possibly overtreatment. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in s-TSH threshold used by general practitioners to initiate LT4 therapy between 2001 and 2015 in Copenhagen. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted of all s-TSH measurements between 2001 and 2015 performed at the general practitioners' joint laboratory merged with The Danish Register of Medicinal Products Statistics and The Danish National Patient Registry. For each year, both the median s-TSH at therapy initiation and the estimated treatment threshold were calculated from all s-TSH measurements performed in that year, representing the s-TSH level where the estimated probability of starting LT4 therapy was 50%. Results: A total of 929,684 individuals with 2,975,277 s-TSH measurements were included in the calculations. The size and composition of the study population remained virtually unchanged. During the study period, the number of performed s-TSH measurements increased from 110,886 to 292,911 (164%), and the number of patients initiating LT4 therapy increased from 786 to 1825 (132%), though this was comparably unchanged from 2010 to 2015. The median s-TSH at therapy initiation decreased from 10 mIU/L (interquartile range 5.2-29.7 mIU/L) in 2001 to 6.8 mIU/L (interquartile range 5.1-11 mIU/L) in 2015, while the estimated treatment threshold decreased from 28.3 mIU/L [confidence interval 21.0-40.2 mIU/L] in 2001 to 14.2 mIU/L [confidence interval 12.0-18.0 mIU/L] in 2007. In 2015, 25% of patients started LT4 therapy with s-TSH ≤5 mIU/L, and during the entire period, 50% of patients started therapy with a single s-TSH measurement >5 mIU/L. Conclusions: This study performed on a sizeable primary care population demonstrates a considerable fall in the threshold for initiating LT4 therapy in hypothyroid patients. This increases the risk of futile treatment as well as overtreatment.

Association Between 3-Iodothyronamine (T1am) Concentrations and Left Ventricular Function in Chronic Heart Failure

CONTEXT

Thyroid hormone metabolites might affect the heart. The endogenous aminergic metabolite 3-iodothyronamine (T1am) reduces left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in rodents.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate concentration of T1am and its association with LVEF and biomarkers of heart function in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) without thyroid disease, including patients with cardiac cachexia (nonedematous weight loss >5% over 6 months).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. CHF was characterized by LVEF <45% and symptoms. Three groups were included (n = 19 in each group, matched on age, sex, and kidney function): patients with cachexia (CAC), patients without (non-CAC), and control (C) patients with prior myocardial infarction and LVEF >45%. T1am was measured by a monoclonal antibody-based chemiluminescence immunoassay. N-amino terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) concentrations were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) LVEF: CAC, 32 ± 9%; non-CAC, 38 ± 8%; and C, 60 ± 8% (P < 0.0001). TSH, T4, and T3 levels did not differ between groups and did not correlate to T1am. Serum T1am (nmol/L) concentrations were higher in CHF: CAC (mean ± SD), 12.4 ± 6.6; non-CAC, 9.1 ± 5; and C, 7.3 ± 2.9. A negative association between T1am and LVEF was present after adjusting for sex, age, T3, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.03). Further, serum T1am levels tended to be associated with NT-proBNP (P = 0.053).

CONCLUSION

Serum T1am levels were increased in patients with CHF and numerically highest (although nonsignificant) in patients with cardiac cachexia. Increasing T1am concentrations were independently associated with reduced LVEF, suggesting a direct effect on the human heart.

Levothyroxine/Liothyronine Combination Therapy and Quality of Life: Is It All about Weight Loss?

OBJECTIVES

According to one hypothesis, the popularity of levothyroxine (L-T₄)/liothyronine (L-T₃) combination therapy relates to weight loss. The purpose of this study was to detect a possible correlation between thyroid-related quality of life (QoL) and weight loss in hypothyroid patients switched from L-T₄ monotherapy to L-T₄/L-T₃ combination therapy.

METHODS

In an open-label cohort study, all hypothyroid patients referred to the University Hospital endocrine clinic due to persistent symptoms despite adequate L-T₄ monotherapy (without other explanations for the symptoms) were switched from L-T₄ monotherapy to L-T₄/ L-T₃ combination therapy at a ratio of approximately 17/1. At baseline and after 3 months of treatment we measured: QoL by the Thyroid Patient-Reported Outcome (ThyPRO-39) questionnaire, thyroid hormones, body weight, body composition by a DEXA-scan, and cognitive function by evaluating participants' reaction time as well as working memory by the California Computerized Assessment Package (CalCAP®). QoL was re-evaluated after 12 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients participated (91% women, median age 47 years). The ThyPRO-39 composite score decreased from a median of 54 (quartiles: 34, 74) to 15 (11, 28) after 3 months (p < 0.0001), and 20 (14, 26) after 12 months, indicating a better QoL. There was no change in body weight, and no correlations between QoL and weight. There was a slight improvement in cognitive function, whereas body composition, heart rate, and serum TSH did not change.

CONCLUSION

Our study on hypothyroid patients switched from L-T₄ monotherapy to L-T₄/L-T₃ combination therapy showed a substantial improvement in QoL measured by the ThyPRO-39. This improvement could not be explained by weight loss.

Neither Baseline nor Changes in Serum Triiodothyronine during Levothyroxine/Liothyronine Combination Therapy Predict a Positive Response to This Treatment Modality in Hypothyroid Patients with Persistent Symptoms

BACKGROUND

Despite biochemical euthyroidism, some levothyroxine (L-T₄)-treated hypothyroid patients report persisting symptoms and some of these patients are tentatively treated with a combination of L-T₄ and liothyronine (L-T₃). Combination therapy and the appropriate choice of blood tests to monitor treatment are highly debated among specialists and patients.

AIM

To evaluate whether measuring serum triiodothyronine (S-T₃) at baseline or during combination therapy can be used as an indicator of a positive effect from L-T₄/L-T₃ combination therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational retrospective study of patients (n = 42) with persisting symptoms of hypothyroidism despite L-T₄ therapy who had normal TSH levels and did not have any comorbidities that could explain their symptoms. All were then treated with L-T₄/L-T₃ combination therapy at a dose ratio of 17/1 according to European Thyroid Association guidelines. Based on patient-reported outcome, they were divided into responders and nonresponders.

RESULTS

Five patients were lost to follow-up and thus excluded. At the 3-month follow-up, 11 were classified as nonresponders and 26 as responders. At 12 months these figures had changed to 13 (35%) and 24 (65%), respectively. When comparing responders versus nonresponders, no differences were seen at baseline or during follow-up in S-T₃ and in free T₃ estimates. Further, logistic regression showed no correlation between S-T₃ and free T₃ estimates and responder/nonresponder status.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that serum T₃ measurements are not suitable to predict which patient will benefit from L-T₄/L-T₃ combination therapy, and treatment response cannot be followed by repeated T₃ measurements either.

Radioiodine Therapy Does Not Change the Atherosclerotic Burden of the Carotid Arteries

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Atherosclerosis evolves or accelerates when arteries are exposed to ionizing radiation, both early and late after exposure. Radioiodine therapy of benign thyroid disease exposes the carotid arteries to 4-50 Gy, and may thereby increase the risk of atherosclerosis. Increased risk of cerebrovascular events has been reported after radioiodine therapy. This study aimed to examine whether atherosclerosis develops early or late after radioiodine therapy of benign thyroid disease.

METHOD

Patients treated for benign thyroid disorders (nontoxic goiter, adenoma, and hyperthyroidism) were examined with ultrasound for the main outcome, carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), and for plaque presence (plaque presence only in late damage). Signs of early damage from radioiodine were studied in 39 radioiodine-treated patients, who were examined before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Late changes were studied in a cross-sectional case-control design, with radioiodine-treated patients as cases (n = 193) and patients treated with surgery as controls (n = 95). Data were analyzed with repeated measurement for longitudinal data, and with multivariate regression for cross-sectional data. Results were adjusted for age, sex, cholesterol, smoking status, known atherosclerotic disease, and body mass index.

RESULTS

No changes in CIMT were found in the patients followed prospectively for one year after treatment with radioactive iodine for benign thyroid disease (p = 0.58). In the study on late effects, there was no difference in CIMT (p = 0.25) or presence of plaques (p = 0.70) between those treated with radioactive iodine and those treated with surgery (9.8 and 5.6 years since treatment, respectively). Furthermore, the level of thyrotropin (TSH) did not influence these atherosclerosis markers.

CONCLUSION

No early changes in CIMT were detected in patients treated with radioactive iodine for benign thyroid disease. No signs of late effects of radioactive iodine on CIMT or plaque presence were found after 10 years of follow-up. The radiation to the carotid arteries by radioactive iodine therapy for benign thyroid disease may therefore have no or low effect on atherosclerotic burden of the carotid arteries in general.

Treating Hypothyroidism with Thyroxine/Triiodothyronine Combination Therapy in Denmark: Following Guidelines or Following Trends?

BACKGROUND

Five to ten percent of patients with hypothyroidism describe persistent symptoms despite being biochemically well regulated on levothyroxine (L-T4). Thyroxine (T4)/triiodothyronine (T3) combination therapy [L-T4/liothyronine (L-T3) or desiccated thyroid] are still regarded as experimental with no evidence of superior effect on persistent symptoms according to meta-analyses. However, some randomized controlled trials have demonstrated patients' preference for T4/T3 combination therapy as compared to L-T4 monotherapy. In 2013, attention to combination therapy increased in Denmark after a patient published a book describing her experiences with hypothyroidism and treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate current Danish trends in the use of T4/T3 combination therapy.

METHODS

We used an Internet-based questionnaire, distributed as a link via two Danish patient fora. Further, information was obtained from the Division of Pharmacies and Reimbursement at the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and from the only pharmacy in Denmark producing desiccated thyroid and L-T3 tablets.

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients answered the questionnaire, and 293 responders were included. Sixty-nine percent of the responders had six or more symptoms, and 84% reported a treatment effect. Forty-four percent of the responders received their prescriptions from general practitioners; 50% received desiccated thyroid and 28% reported that they adjust their dose themselves. Responders followed by general practitioners more frequently received desiccated thyroid and adjusted their dose themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased media focus has changed the prescription pattern of thyroid hormones; European guidelines on T4/T3 combination therapy are not always followed in Denmark and many patients adjust their medication themselves and may therefore be at risk of overtreatment.

Radioiodine therapy increases the risk of cerebrovascular events in hyperthyroid and euthyroid patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hyperthyroid patients treated with radioiodine have increased morbidity and mortality from cerebrovascular events. This risk has until now has been attributed to the hyperthyroidism. However, radioiodine therapy of benign thyroid diseases exposes the carotid arteries to radiation and is capable of inducing atherosclerosis. The objective of the study was to elucidate whether ionizing radiation from radioiodine might contribute to cerebrovascular morbidity.

METHODS

In a retrospective register cohort study, 4000 hyperthyroid and 1022 euthyroid goitre patients treated with radioiodine between 1975 and 2008 were matched 1:4 on age and sex with random controls. The cohort was followed from the date of treatment until hospitalization due to cerebrovascular event, death, 20 years of follow-up or March 2013. Data were analyzed in competing risk models adjusting for age, sex, Charlson's comorbidity score, atrial fibrillation and previous cerebrovascular events.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 11.5 years, mean age 61 years, with a total number of 3228 events. Comparing all radioiodine-treated patients with controls, the fully adjusted model showed increased risk of cerebrovascular events among all treated patients, hazard ratio (HR) 1.18 (95% CI 1.09-1.29). The risk was increased among hyperthyroid (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.07-1.28) as well as euthyroid patients (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02-1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

We report an increased risk of cerebrovascular events in hyperthyroid as well as euthyroid patients treated with radioiodine for benign thyroid disorders. That these patient groups have similar risks suggests the possibility that radiation from radioiodine contributes to cerebrovascular morbidity via acceleration or initiation of atherosclerosis.

The use of triage in Danish emergency departments

INTRODUCTION

The emergency departments (EDs) handle approximately 1,000,000 contacts annually. Danish health care is undergoing reorganization that involves the creation of fewer and larger EDs to handle these contacts. There is therefore a need to prioritize the use of resources to optimize treatment. We thus wanted to investigate if Danish EDs are using triage systems and, if so, which systems they are using.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study on triage at all EDs in the 20 Danish hospitals that have been designated for emergency care.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% (n = 20). We found that triage was used at 75% (n = 15) of the EDs. Adaptive process triage (ADAPT) was the most frequently used validated triage system (25% (n = 5)), while 40% (n = 8) used non-validated systems. Triage was performed by nurses at 73% (n = 11) of the EDs using triage.

CONCLUSION

Triage systems were used in 75% of Danish EDs. ADAPT was the primary triage system in 25% of the EDs, while 40% used non-validated triage systems. An improvement in the quality of health care in Danish EDs may possibly be achieved by implementing validated triage, i.e. ADAPT.

FUNDING

not relevant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not relevant.

Inconsistent reporting of surrogate outcomes in randomised clinical trials: cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess if authors of randomised clinical trials convey the fact that they have used surrogate outcomes and discussed their validity.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Six major general medical journals.

PARTICIPANTS

Randomised clinical trials published in 2005 and 2006 that used a surrogate as a primary outcome.

RESULTS

Of 626 published randomised clinical trials, 109 (17%) used a surrogate as a primary outcome. Of these trials, 62 (57%, 95% confidence interval 47% to 67%) clearly reported that the primary outcome was a surrogate. Only 38 (35%, 26% to 45%) also discussed the validity of the surrogate.

CONCLUSION

Only about one third of authors of randomised clinical trials that used a surrogate as a primary outcome reported adequately on the surrogate. Better reporting is needed.