Association Between Coronary Artery Disease Testing in Patients with New-Onset Heart Failure and Heart Failure Readmission and Mortality

BACKGROUND

In patients with new-onset heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease (CAD) testing remains underutilized. Whether widespread CAD testing in patients with new-onset HF leads to improved outcomes remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine whether CAD testing, and its timing, among patients hospitalized with new-onset HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), is associated with improved outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult (≥ 18 years) non-pregnant patients with new-onset HFrEF hospitalized within one of 15 Kaiser Permanente Southern California medical centers between 2016 and 2021. Key exclusion criteria included history of heart transplant, hospice, and a do-not-resuscitate order.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcome was a composite of HF readmission or all-cause mortality through end of follow-up on 12/31/2022.

KEY RESULTS

Among 2729 patients hospitalized with new-onset HFrEF, 1487 (54.5%) received CAD testing. The median age was 66 (56-76) years old, 1722 (63.1%) were male, and 1074 (39.4%) were White. After a median of 1.8 (0.6-3.4) years, the testing group had a reduced risk of HF readmission or all-cause mortality (aHR [95%CI], 0.71 [0.63-0.79]). These results were consistent across subgroups by history of atrial fibrillation, diabetes, renal disease, myocardial infarction, and elevated troponin during hospitalization. In a secondary analysis where CAD testing was further divided to early (received testing before discharge) and late testing (up to 90 days after discharge), there was no difference in late vs early testing (0.97 [0.81-1.16]).

CONCLUSIONS

In a contemporary and diverse cohort of patients hospitalized with new-onset HFrEF, CAD testing within 90 days of hospitalization was associated with a lower risk of HF readmission or all-cause mortality. Testing within 90 days after discharge was not associated with worse outcomes.

A mixed-methods evaluation of home-based primary care in dementia within an integrated system

BACKGROUND

No prior studies have examined the effects of home-based primary care (HBPC) in persons living with dementia (PLWD), within an ecosystem of serious illness care in an integrated healthcare system. Our objectives were to compare the characteristics of PLWD receiving HBPC and their hospital utilization and end-of-life care, with those of a matched comparison group, and to understand the experiences of family caregivers of PLWD receiving HBPC.

METHODS

This mixed-methods study used a retrospective observational cohort design with PLWD receiving HBPC (n = 287) from 2015 to 2020 and a strata-matched comparison group (n = 861), and qualitative phone interviews with 16 HBPC family caregivers in 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score-adjusted models were used to compare time-to-first hospital-based utilization and, for decedents, home palliative and hospice care and place of death. Care experience was captured through caregiver interviews.

RESULTS

Patients receiving HBPC had a similar risk of hospital utilization [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06 (95% CI: 0.89-1.26), p = 0.51] as a matched non-HBPC comparison group after a median follow-up of 199 days. However, HBPC decedents (n = 159) were more likely to receive home palliative care or hospice [rate ratio, RR: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07-1.42), p < 0.01] and to die at home [RR: 1.66 (95% CI: 1.35-2.05), p < 0.001] than were non-HBPC decedents (n = 423). Caregivers reported that HBPC provided coordinated, continuous, and convenient care that was aligned with families' priorities and goals; however, some expressed unmet needs, especially for help paying for personal care and medical supplies/equipment, and a desire for clearer communication about program operations and more quality oversight for contract services.

CONCLUSIONS

Although HBPC for PLWD was associated with a similar risk of hospital utilization compared to a matched non-HBPC comparison group, HBPC resulted in more patient-centered end-of-life care for decedents. Prospective studies of HBPC that further elicit and address unmet needs are warranted.