MO603: Effects of Intradialytic Bicycle Ergometer Exercise on Inflammation Transcription Factors in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis (HD). In this context, the therapeutic potential of targeting the gene transcription factors associated with these mechanisms has been studied; for instance, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), the master regulator of antioxidant responses and, nuclear factor κappa B (NF-κB) that promotes the inflammatory response. However, the effects of physical exercise on the modulation of these factors are under investigation in CKD patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an intradialytic aerobic exercise training program on the expression of transcription factors (Nrf2 and NF-κB) in patients with CKD on HD.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal, randomized clinical trial with a washout period and crossover performed with 18 patients randomized into two groups: Exercise (individualized intradialytic aerobic exercise on an adapted stationary exercise bike) three times per week for 3 months and control (without exercise). After the washout period (1 month), the exercise group became the control, and the other group performed the exercises for another 3 months. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated, and quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed to evaluate Nrf2, NF-kB and NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1) mRNA expression. The plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were evaluated by ELISA.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients [11 men, 44.1 ± 8.4 years, 17.3 (6.6–124) months on HD] completed all the study. The obtained data revealed that the intervention did not affect the mRNA expression of Nrf2, NQO1 and NF-κB (Table 1). Also, TNF-α levels were not changed. However, IL-6 showed a tendency to decrease after the exercise intervention (P = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

Three months of intradialytic aerobic exercise were insufficient for modulating the transcription factors associated with antioxidant activity (Nrf2 and NQO1) and inflammation (NF-κB) in patients with CKD.

Probiotic Supplementation in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplementation on the gut microbiota profile and inflammatory markers in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD).

DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Forty-six HD patients were assigned to receive 1 of 2 treatments: probiotic (n = 23; Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus e Bifidobacterialongum, 90 billion colony-forming units per day) or placebo (n = 23) daily for 3 months. Blood and feces were collected at baseline and after intervention. The inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and interleukin-6) were analyzed by immunoenzymatic assay (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Uremic toxins plasma levels (indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, and indole-3-acetic acid) were obtained by Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Routine laboratory parameters were measured by standard techniques. Fecal pH was measured by the colorimetric method, and the gut microbiota profile was assessed by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients remained in the probiotic group (11 men, 53.6 ± 11.0 year old, 25.3 ± 4.6 kg/m²) and 17 in the placebo group (10 men, 50.3 ± 8.5 year old, 25.2 ± 5.7 kg/m²). After probiotic supplementation there was a significant increase in serum urea (from 149.6 ± 34.2 mg/dL to 172.6 ± 45.0 mg/dL, P = .02), potassium (from 4.4 ± 0.4 mmol/L to 4.8 ± 0.4 mmol/L, P = .02), and indoxyl sulfate (from 31.2 ± 15.9 to 36.5 ± 15.0 mg/dL, P = .02). The fecal pH was reduced from 7.2 ± 0.8 to 6.5 ± 0.5 (P = .01). These parameters did not change significantly in placebo group. Changes in the percentage delta (Δ) between groups were exhibited with no statistical differences observed. The inflammatory markers and gut profile were not altered by supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprobiotic supplementation failed to reduce uremic toxins and inflammatory markers. Therefore, probiotic therapy should be chosen with caution in HD patients. Further studies addressing probiotic therapy in chronic kidney disease patients are needed.