Polymorphic Variants of SCN5A Gene (rs41312433 and rs1805124) Associated with Coronary Artery Affliction in Patients with Severe Arrhythmias

Several mutations in this gene for the α subunit of the cardiac sodium channel have been identified in a heterogeneous subset of cardiac rhythm syndromes, including Brugada syndrome, progressive cardiac conduction defect, sick sinus node syndrome, atrial fibrillation and dilated cardiomyopathy. The aim of our study was to associate some SCN5A polymorphic variants directly with confirmed coronary stenoses in patients with non-LQTS ventricular fibrillation/flutter treated by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 32 unrelated individuals, aged 63 ± 12 years, was included in the study. All the patients were examined, diagnosed and treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator at the Department of Internal Cardiology Medicine, Faculty Hospital Brno. The control group included 87 persons of similar age without afflicted coronary circulation, which was confirmed coronagraphically. Genomic DNA was extracted from samples of peripheral blood according to the standard protocol. Two SCN5A polymorphisms-IVS9-3C/A (rs41312433) and A1673G (rs1805124, H558R)-were examined in association with coronary artery stenosis in the patients.

RESULTS

In the case-control study, no significant differences in genotype distribution/allelic frequencies were observed for IVS9-3c>a and A1673G gene polymorphisms between patients with severe arrhythmias and healthy persons. The distribution of SCN5A double genotypes was not significantly different among different types of arrhythmias according to their ejection fraction in arrhythmic patients (p = 0.396). The ventricular arrhythmias with an ejection fraction below 40% were found to be 10.67 times more frequent in patients with multiple coronary stenosis with clinically valid sensitivity, specificity and power tests. In the genotype-phenotype study, we observed a significant association of both SCN5A polymorphisms with the stenosis of coronary vessels in the patients with severe arrhythmia. The double genotype of polymorphisms IVS9-3C/A together with A1673G (CCAA) as well as their simple genotypes were associated with significant multiple stenosis of coronary arteries (MVS) with high sensitivity and specificity (p = 0.05; OR = 5 (95% CI 0.99-23.34); sensitivity 0.70; specificity 0.682; power test 0.359) Moreover, when a concrete stenotic coronary artery was associated with SCN5A genotypes, the CCAA double genotype was observed to be five times more frequent in patients with significant stenosis in the right coronary artery (RCA) compared to those without affliction of this coronary artery (p = 0.05; OR = 5 (95% CI 0.99-23.34); sensitivity 0.682; specificity 0.700; power test 0.359). The CCAA genotype was also more frequent in patients without RCA affliction with MVS (p = 0.008); in patients with ACD affliction but without MVS (p = 0.008); and in patients with both ACD affliction and MVS compared to those without ACD affliction and MVS (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents a highly sensitive and specific association of two polymorphisms in SCN5A with significant coronary artery stenoses in patients with potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. At the same time, these polymorphisms were not associated with arrhythmias themselves. Thus, SCN5A gene polymorphic variants may form a part of germ cell gene predisposition to ischemia.

Relation between Mid-Regional Pro-Adrenomedullin in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and the Dose of Diuretics in 2-Year Follow-Up-Data from FAR NHL Registry

Background and Objectives: The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of humoral substance mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) on the two-year survival of patients with chronic heart failure and relate it to the dosage of furosemide. Materials and Methods: The data is taken from the stable systolic heart failure (EF < 50%) FAR NHL registry (FARmacology and NeuroHumoraL activation). The primary endpoint at two-year follow-up was death, heart transplantation, or LVAD implantation. Results: A total of 1088 patients were enrolled in the FAR NHL registry; MR-proADM levels were available for 569 of them. The mean age was 65 years, and 81% were male. The aetiology of HF was ischemic heart disease in 53% and dilated cardiomyopathy in 41% of patients. The mean EF was 31 ± 9%. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were obtained in several parameters: patients with higher MR-proADM levels were older, rated higher in NYHA class, suffered more often from lower limb oedema, and had more comorbidities such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and renal impairment. MR-proADM level was related to furosemide dose. Patients taking higher doses of diuretics had higher MR-proADM levels. The mean MR-proADM level without furosemide (n = 122) was 0.62 (±0.55) nmol/L, with low dose (n = 113) 1−39 mg/day was 0.67 (±0.30) nmol/L, with mid dose (n = 202) 40−79 mg/day was 0.72 (±0.34) nmol/L, with high dose (n = 58) 80−119 mg/day was 0.85 (±0.40) nmol/L, and with maximum dose (n = 74) ≥120 mg/day was 1.07 (±0.76) nmol/L, p < 0.001. Patients with higher MR-proADM levels were more likely to achieve the primary endpoint at a two-year follow-up (p < 0.001) according to multivariant analysis. Conclusions: Elevated plasma MR-proADM levels in patients with chronic heart failure are associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization. Higher MR-proADM levels in combination with increased use of loop diuretics reflect residual congestion and are associated with a higher risk of severe disease progression.

Betablockers after myocardial infarction and chronic coronary heart disease

Treatment with beta-blockers has been an essential part of secondary prevention after myocardial infarction or chronic CHD for several decades. Studies that have shown a beneficial prognostically beneficial effect of beta-blockers were conducted in the period prior to the routine use of reperfusion therapy. In patients who have been treated with fibrinolytic therapy, their contribution is less pronounced. The situation is even less clear in patients who are treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, as prospective studies and observational data from registries do not yet give a clear view of the indications and clinical contribution of beta-blockers, especially in the group with normal ejection fraction, without signs of heart failure. Here are the latest different studies from the South Korean and Danish national registries in patients with CHD without heart failure and the effect of beta-blockers on the long-term prognosis.

What do the new ESC Guidelines for the treatment of heart failure bring to internists?

Chronic heart failure is in european countries in 0,4-2,0% population with an increase with age. The improved care of acute cases enables to decrease the number of patients with chronic heart failure.The disease has a bad prognosis, the diagnosis therapy are demanding. European guidelines for diagnosis and treatment heart failure stress, that patients should have all 4 drugs with class 1 reccomendation (ACE I/ARNI, betablockers, MRA and SGLT2) in reccomended doses. These drugs will be given step by step with dose titration.

Long-Term Ticagrelor in Patients With Prior Coronary Stenting in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial

Background Coronary stent type and risk of stent thrombosis remain important factors affecting recommended duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of long-term ticagrelor in patients with prior coronary stenting enrolled in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54) trial. Methods and Results Patients in PEGASUS-TIMI 54 had a myocardial infarction 1 to 3 year prior and were randomized 1:1:1 to ticagrelor 60 or 90 mg BID or placebo. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events). Stent thrombosis was prospectively adjudicated (Academic Research Consortium definition). Baseline characteristics were compared by most recent stent type (bare metal versus drug-eluting stent and first- versus later-generation drug-eluting stent). Treatment arms were compared using Cox proportional hazards models. Of 21 162 patients randomized, 80% (n=16 891) had prior coronary stenting. Following randomization, myocardial infarction was the most frequent ischemic event in patients with prior stenting in the placebo arm, occurring in 5.2% of patients (Type 1: 4.1%), followed by cardiovascular death (2.3%), stroke (1.7%), and stent thrombosis (0.9%). Ticagrelor_pooled reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (7.0% versus 8.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-96) regardless of stent type (bare metal stent versus drug-eluting stent: p_interaction=0.767; first versus later generation: p_interaction=0.940). The rate of any stent thrombosis was numerically lower with ticagrelor_pooled (0.7% versus 0.9%; HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.50-1.05) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding was increased (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.90-3.68). Conclusions Long-term ticagrelor reduces major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction and coronary stenting regardless of stent type, with the benefit driven predominantly by reduction in de novo events. Nonfatal major bleeding is increased with ticagrelor. Registration Information clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01225562.

Obesity and effects of dapagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial

AIMS 

We investigated the associations between obesity, cardiorenal events, and benefits of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS AND RESULTS 

DECLARE-TIMI 58 randomized patients with T2DM and either atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease or multiple risk factors to dapagliflozin vs. placebo. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI, kg/m2): normal (18.5 to <25), overweight (25 to <30), moderately obese (30 to <35), severely obese (35 to <40), and very-severely obese (≥40). Outcomes analysed were CV death, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), renal-specific composite outcome, and atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL). Of 17 134 patients, 9.0% had a normal BMI, 31.5% were overweight, 32.4% were moderately, 17.2% severely, and 9.8% were very-severely obese. Higher BMI was associated with a higher adjusted risk of HHF and AF/AFL (hazard ratio 1.30 and 1.28, respectively, per 5 kg/m2; P < 0.001 for all). Dapagliflozin reduced body weight by similar relative amounts consistently across BMI categories (percent difference: -1.9 to -2.4%). Although relative risk reductions in CV and renal-specific composite outcomes with dapagliflozin did not significantly differ across the range of BMI (P for interaction ≥0.20 for all outcomes), obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) tended to derive greater absolute risk reduction in HHF and AF/AFL (P for interaction 0.02 and 0.09, respectively) than non-obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS 

In DECLARE-TIMI 58, patients with T2DM and higher BMI were more likely to have HHF and AF/AFL. Whereas relative risk reductions in CV and renal outcomes with dapagliflozin were generally consistent across the range of BMI, absolute risk reduction in obesity-related outcomes including HHF and AF/AFL tended to be larger in obese patients with T2DM.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01730534.

EMPEROR reduced - empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is common in patients with chronic heart failure and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Significant advances have recently occured in the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) and cardiovascular diseases. Several new glucose lowering drugs have shown either neutral or positive cardiovascular effect especially on hospitalisations, but also on mortality. Some of these drugs have safety characteristics with strong practical implication in heart failure, for example sodium-glucose co-transporters type 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2). Position paper of the European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association was published in October 2019 and in June 2020. The results of EMPEROR reduced study were presented on European congress in september 2020. In this phase III, placebo-controlled trial, 3730 patients with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomly assigned to receive either empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or placebo, in addition to recommended therapy. Over a median of 16 months, the primary outcome (cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure) occurred in 361 of 1863 patients (19.4%) in the empagliflozin group and in 462 of 1867 patients (24.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.86; P.

Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The effect of vericiguat, a novel oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction who had recently been hospitalized or had received intravenous diuretic therapy is unclear.

METHODS

In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned 5 050 patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV) and an ejection fraction of less than 45% to receive vericiguat (target dose 10 mg once daily) or placebo, in addition to guideline-based medical therapy.The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or first hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

Over a median of 10.8 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 897 of 2 526 patients (35.5%) in the vericiguat group and in 972 of 2 524 patients (38.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.02). A total of 691 patients (27.4%) in the vericiguat group and 747 patients (29.6%) in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure. Death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 414 patients (16.4%) in the vericiguat group and in 441 patients (17.5%) in the placebo group. The composite endpoint of death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 957 patients (37.9%) in the vericiguat group and in 1 032 patients (40.9%) in the placebo group (p = 0.02). Symptomatic hypotension occurred in 9.1% of the patients in the vericiguat group and in 7.9% of the patients in the placebo group (p = 0.12), syncope occurred in 4.0% of the patients in the vericiguat group and in 3.5% of the patients in the placebo group (p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with high-risk heart failure, the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure was lower among those who received vericiguat than those who received placebo.

Effects of Serelaxin in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Serelaxin is a recombinant form of human relaxin-2, a vasodilator hormone that contributes to cardiovascular and renal adaptations during pregnancy. Previous studies have suggested that treatment with serelaxin may result in relief of symptoms and in better outcomes in patients with acute heart failure.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial, we enrolled patients who were hospitalized for acute heart failure and had dyspnea, vascular congestion on chest radiography, increased plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides, mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency, and a systolic blood pressure of at least 125 mm Hg, and we randomly assigned them within 16 hours after presentation to receive either a 48-hour intravenous infusion of serelaxin (30 μg per kilogram of body weight per day) or placebo, in addition to standard care. The two primary end points were death from cardiovascular causes at 180 days and worsening heart failure at 5 days.

RESULTS

A total of 6545 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At day 180, death from cardiovascular causes had occurred in 285 of the 3274 patients (8.7%) in the serelaxin group and in 290 of the 3271 patients (8.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.15; P = 0.77). At day 5, worsening heart failure had occurred in 227 patients (6.9%) in the serelaxin group and in 252 (7.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.07; P = 0.19). There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of death from any cause at 180 days, the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or rehospitalization for heart failure or renal failure at 180 days, or the length of the index hospital stay. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving patients who were hospitalized for acute heart failure, an infusion of serelaxin did not result in a lower incidence of death from cardiovascular causes at 180 days or worsening heart failure at 5 days than placebo. (Funded by Novartis Pharma; RELAX-AHF-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01870778.).

Innovations in pharmacological treatment of heart failure

The main goal of the heart failure treatment is the decrease of mortality and morbidity, especially improvement of quality of life and decrease of hospitalisations. ACE inhibitors are the cornerstone of the treatment, MRA should be added to ACEI. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are indicated in the case of ACE inhibitors intolerance. Betablockers in maximal tolerated doses should be added to the renin angiotensin blockade. Diuretics are given to the symptoms relieve - dyspnoe or oedema. Digoxin is indicated in selected patients. There are 3 new promising groups of drugs: (1) Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor - ARNI - Sacubitril/Valsartan can replace the ACEI according to the results of the PARADIGM-HF trial. (2) Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with diabetes mellitus. (3) A hughe clinical research is done with omecamtiv mecarbil and others perspective drugs.

Prescription and dosage of RAAS inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure in the FAR NHL registry

BACKGROUND

Congestive heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a common clinical condition with a serious prognosis. Treatment focuses on improving the symptoms and preventing the progression of the disease. First-line therapy include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

METHODS

These data come from the FAR NHL registry (FARmacology and NeuroHumoraL activation). This is a multicenter database of patients with stable systolic heart failure (EF &lt; 50 %) collected between November 2014 and November 2015.

RESULTS

A population of 1&#8239;100 patients was evaluated, the mean age was 65 years, 80.8 % were male. The etiology of heart failure was ischemic heart disease (49.7 %), dilated cardiomyopathy (41.7 %) and other (8.6 %). The total prescription of ACEI/ARB was 88.4 %, the most commonly prescribed ACEI were ramipril and perindopril, ARB was losartan. The prescription of ACEI/ARBs decreased with the severity of the disease according to NYHA classification (all 88.4 %, NYHA I 95.2 %, NYHA II 89.0 %, NYHA III-IV 83.5 %, p &lt; 0.001). 129 subjects (11.6 %) were not treated by ACEI/ARBs at all. The target dose of ACEI/ARB, as it is recommended in the ESC Guidelines, was admissioned to only 13.5 % of patients. The dose was decreasing with the severity of disease evaluated by NYHA, NT-proBNP value, systolic blood pressure and renal functions.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show the tendency of pharmacological prescription of RAAS blockers (including doses), which reflects not only the severity of heart failure but also renal functions and blood pressure and points to possible reserves in up-titration of the target dose. Key words: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors - angiotensin receptor blockers - FAR NHL - heart failure - pharmacotherapy - registry - target dose.

Arrhythmias and conductance disturbances and heart failure

Arrhythmias and conductance disturbances and heart failure have a close relation. Arrhythmias are serious complication, but also etiology of heart failure. So it is not clear, what is the cause and what is a consequence. Atrial fibrillation is a frequent cause, ventricular arrhythmias a frequent consequence and ventricular fibrillation a frequent cause of death in patients with heart failure. Overview are about frequent arrhythmias as well as their therapy with regard to left ventricular dysfunction. Key words: arrhythmias - heart failure.

The heart transplantation

The article reviews history, indication and follow-up after heart transplantation, including the mechanical assist devices. Various complications of posttransplant follow-up are mentioned, e.g. rejection, infection, vasculopathy, meta-bolic disorders, hypertension or malignities. Pharmacotherapy used for immunosuppression is discussed. Heart transplantation improves the prognosis of patients with previous heart failure and also their quality of life. Key words: heart transplantation - immunosuppression - mechanical assist devices - rejection - terminal heart failure.

Pathophysiology, causes and epidemiology of chronic heart failure

The prevalence of heart failure in developed countries is about 1-2 % in general and in patients above 70 years over 10 %. HFpEF is the cause of heart failure from 22 to 73 %, exact data are not available. If compared with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF are older, more frequent women with hypertension and atrial fibrillation, but less myocardial infarction in their history. Heart failure is a hemodynamic disorder and the pathophysiologic basis is cardiac output, cardiac contractility, filling pressures, wall stress during systolic and diastolic function and heart rate. The neurohumoral activation is very important for the diagnosis as well as prognosis and the most sensitive seems to be brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), respectively the precursor NT-proBNP, which become a part of the new diagnostic classification and are a part of modern treatment. Key words: heart failure - hemodynamics - neurohumoral activation.

[Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome]

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an important cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Early diagnostics of this disease helps in the appropriate treatment of patients. Great attention is paid to the diagnostic and risk stratification of patients according to circulating biomarkers. There are a lot of scientific publications describing this topic. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the most important and most examined biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome. Meanwhile troponin takes a fundamental place for AMI diagnostic (mostly the high-sensitive methods) in preference to MB-fraction of creatine kinase and myoglobin. The connection to a higher sudden death risk, reinfarcts and heart failure occurring was also proved by many other biomarkers. The most important of them are the natriuretic peptides, the C-reactive protein, the heart fatty acid binding protein, the pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, CD146, cystatin C, NGAL, copeptin, MR-proadrenomedullin, and the growth differentiation factor-15. More prospective randomized studies are needed for the further use of these other biomarkers in clinical practice.Key words: acute coronary syndrome - biomarkers.

Comorbidities in heart failure

Comorbidities are important parts of care in patients with heart failure. Comorbidities, as well as their treatments, directly influence the course of heart failure. We present the most comorbidities a their therapy with regard to left ventricular dysfunction. Key words: comorbidities - heart failure.

Benefit of Adding Ezetimibe to Statin Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Safety in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus: Results From IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial)

BACKGROUND

Ezetimibe, when added to simvastatin, reduces cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndrome. We explored outcomes stratified by diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

In IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial), 18 144 patients after acute coronary syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 50 to 125 mg/dL were randomized to 40 mg ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) or 40 mg placebo/simvastatin. The primary composite end point was cardiovascular death, major coronary events, and stroke. DM was a prespecified subgroup.

RESULTS

The 4933 (27%) patients with DM were more often older and female, had had a prior myocardial infarction and revascularization, and presented more frequently with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome compared with patients without DM (each P<0.001). The median admission low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was lower among patients with DM (89 versus 97 mg/dL, P<0.001). E/S achieved a significantly lower median time-weighted average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with placebo/simvastatin, irrespective of DM (DM: 49 versus 67 mg/dL; no DM: 55 versus 71 mg/dL; both P<0.001). In patients with DM, E/S reduced the 7-year Kaplan-Meier primary end point event rate by 5.5% absolute (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.94); in patients without DM, the absolute difference was 0.7% (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.04; P_int=0.02). The largest relative reductions in patients with DM were in myocardial infarction (24%) and ischemic stroke (39%). No differences in safety outcomes by treatment were present regardless of DM. When stratified further by age, patients ≥75 years of age had a 20% relative reduction in the primary end point regardless of DM (P_int=0.91), whereas patients <75 years of age with DM had greater benefit than those without (P_int=0.011). When stratified by the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) Risk Score for Secondary Prevention, all patients with DM demonstrated benefit with E/S regardless of risk. In contrast, among patients without DM, those with a high risk score experienced a significant (18%) relative reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke with E/S compared with placebo/simvastatin, whereas patients without DM at low or moderate risk demonstrated no benefit with the addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin (P_int =0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

In IMPROVE-IT, the benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin was enhanced in patients with DM and in high-risk patients without DM.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00202878.

[The importance of evaluating the effectiveness of the ventilation VE/VCO2 slope in patients with heart failure]

Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) is accompanied by a whole range of symptoms, which significantly decrease the quality of life; these typically concern dyspnoea, fatigue and exercise intolerance. The objectification of the patients condition but must have an effective means of evaluation. One such resource is cardiopolmonary exercise (CPX) testing with it is functional parameters. CPX test with its functional parameters is one of such means. VO2peak is undoubtebly the parameter, which was used the most often in the past 25 years, however, it has many limitations. It is reason, why the evaluation of ventilation effectiveness using the VE/VCO2 slope is becoming more and more the centre of Czech and foreign interest of cardiologists abroad. Foreign studies have unambiguously proven that because of the absence of the fundamental limitations, such as in case of VO2peak, the VE/VCO2 slope is a stronger predictor of the amount of hospitalizations and of mortality in the population of patients suffering from CHF. This short overview intends to inform of the significant merit of this parameter. That is the reason why the VE/VCO2 should be classified as a standard criterion in indication of heart transplantations, but also in evaluation of seriousness and prognosis in population of patient suffering from HF.Key words: heart failure - mortality - prognosis - ventilation efficiency - VE/VCO2 slope.

[Rivaroxaban in high-risk patients]

Blockade of factor Xa becomes a routine part of clinical practice instead of vitamin K blockade with warfarin, providing a more beneficial and safer effect. The main indications are prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Rivaroxaban has the largest number of data across high risk patients. Rivaroxaban is an oral selective anti Xa inhibitor with well predictive pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. It inhibits thrombin formation for 24 hours, is well absorbed and biological availability is 80-100 %. The excretion is mainly renal and the mean elimination time is 5-9 hours in younger and 11-13 hours in elderly. The pharmacokinetics is minimally influenced by sex and age. The ROCKET AF trial has shown in 14 246 high-risk patients a trend to lowering stroke and systemic embolization by rivaroxaban compared to warfarin without a bleeding increase. The number of events per 100 patient-years was 1.71 in group treated with rivaroxaban compared to 2.16 treated with warfarin (p < 0.001 for non inferiority). A sub-analysis of the ROCKET AF trial has shown numerically trend to higher efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with moderate renal insufficiency compared to warfarin. Mild hepatic impairment did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, compared with healthy subjects. The effects by age and concomitant diseases are discussed. The X-VeRT trial shows a new indication for rivaroxaban - electric cardioversion.Key words: age - anticoagulation - heart failure - high risk patients - renal insufficiency - thromboembolic disease.

Prevention of Stroke with Ticagrelor in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Background:

In the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54), ticagrelor reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events when added to low-dose aspirin in stable patients with prior myocardial infarction, resulting in the approval of ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily for long-term secondary prevention. We investigated the incidence of stroke, outcomes after stroke, and the efficacy of ticagrelor focusing on the approved 60 mg twice daily dose for reducing stroke in this population.

Methods:

Patients were followed for a median of 33 months. Stroke events were adjudicated by a central committee. Data from similar trials were combined using meta-analysis.

Results:

Of 14 112 patients randomly assigned to placebo or ticagrelor 60 mg, 213 experienced a stroke; 85% of these strokes were ischemic. A total of 18% of strokes were fatal and another 15% led to either moderate or severe disability at 30 days. Ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.57–0.98; P =0.034), driven by a reduction in ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.02). Hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 9 patients on placebo and 8 patients on ticagrelor. A meta-analysis across 4 placebo-controlled trials of more intensive antiplatelet therapy in 44 816 patients with coronary disease confirmed a marked reduction in ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–0.81; P =0.0001).

Conclusions:

High-risk patients with prior myocardial infarction are at risk for stroke, approximately one-third of which are fatal or lead to moderate-to-severe disability. The addition of ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily significantly reduced this risk without an excess of hemorrhagic stroke but with more major bleeding. In high-risk patients with coronary disease, more intensive antiplatelet therapy should be considered not only to reduce the risk of coronary events, but also of stroke.

Clinical Trial Registration:

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT01225562.

[What are the effects of fixed-dose combination of candesartan and amlodipine]

We are presenting a current view on a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and candesartan in the treatment of hypertension. Major studies on the individual preparations as well as studies examining their combination are included. This fixed-dose combination expands our possibilities with regard to attaining the blood pressure target values, in particular in patients with risk factors or patients with comorbidities. Finally, the benefit mainly consists in the greater compliance of the patient with a minimum adverse effects.

[Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction]

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction occurs almost with the same frequency as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The diagnosis is based on echocardiography with evidence-based ejection fraction over 50 %, or with left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy, and specification of natriuretic peptides. BNP 35 pg/ml and NT-proBNP 125 pg/ml are considered the limits of the norm for chronic heart failure. The treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction lacks clear evidence of mortality reduction, diuretics are recommended to remove symptoms, ACE inhibitors or sartans and beta-blockers to improve the prognosis. Anticoagulation treatment is recommended for atrial fibrillation and possibly digoxin, hypolipidemics for patients in secondary prevention. An important goal of the treatment is the control of accompanying diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease.

KEY WORDS

accompanying diseases - treatment - heart failure - heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

[The TECOS, EXAMINE and SAVOR studies--how do they differ and what are their outcomes?]

The treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 is effective, but still is not optimal. DPP4 inhibitors (gliptins) are a new group of peroral antidiabetic drugs. The third clinical mortality study with gliptins in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 was finished in 2015. The studies are known under acronym TECOS, SAVOR and EXAMINE and the tested drugs are sitagliptin, saxagliptin and alogliptin. The studies included about 37,000 patients. The studies confirmed the cardiovascular safety of the DPP4 inhibitors, but the question about increased heart failure remains open. The effectiveness of lowering glycaemia (glycated haemoglobin) was confirmed and also the pancreatic safety is confirmed.

[Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, clinical experience with the disease and one-year prognosis of patients]

INTRODUCTION

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is a rare cardiac disease. In the acute phase it may imitate acute myocardial infarction of the anterior wall with ST elevations. This can be complicated by ventricular fibrilation or heart failure. The aim of this study is to show the characteristics of patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy, the one year outcome and the application of magnetic resonance imaging of the heart in the diagnosis of this disease.

METHODS

Forty seven patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy were enrolled in this study. Severe stenosis of coronary arteries was excluded by selective coronarography. In twelve patients the magnetic resonance imaging of the myocardium was performed. The patients were observed for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

89.4 % of takotsubo patients were women. Average of age was 62.3 ± 11.1 years. We found obvious stress factors in 18 patients (38.3 %). Many patients suffered from thyroid disorders, psychiatric, lung or allergic diseases. Thirty nine patients (83.0 %) had the apical and eight the midventricular type of takotsubo cardiomyopathy. In 42 patients (89.4 %) developed systolic left ventricular dysfunction and four patients (8.5 %) were in cardiogenic shock. Four patients (8.5 %) manifested ventricle fibrilation. One patient (2.1 %) had recurring takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

CONCLUSION

Left ventricle function is mostly recovered in patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy, but the acute phase can be complicated by cardiogenic shock or ventricular fibrilation. Magnetic resonance imaging of the heart is indicated in some patients to differentiate this cardiomyopathy from ischemic or inflammatory etiology.

["Stressful holiday" - takotsubo cardiomyopathy]

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) is an acute syndrome characterized by rapid onset of transient systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle. Symptoms, ECG and laboratory findings resemble acute coronary syndrome, from which TTC differs by the absence of coronary artery disease. In typical cases, TTC is triggered by exposure to unexpected stress and the clinical course and prognosis are very good. We present a case of a 63-year-old woman, in whom the onset of the disease was complicated by ventricular fibrillation. The patient recovered without sequelae thanks to immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation and following care in a specialized cardiocenter, which involved also implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator to prevent sudden cardiac death. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is an important entity in the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Despite very good prognosis in most cases it should not be underestimated and it deserves careful attention and treatment which can prevent harmful complications.Key words: myocardial infarction - sudden cardiac death - takotsubo cardiomyopathy - ventricular fibrillation.

[PEGASUS - Ticagrelor in secondary prevention on patients after a myocardial infarction]

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor antagonist that has been shown to reduce ischemic events for up to a year after an acute coronary syndrome. The efficacy and safety of long-term ticagrelor therapy beyond 1 year after a myocardial infarction is unknown.

METHODS

We randomized 21,162 patients with a history of myocardial infarction within the prior 1-3 years in a double-blind 1 : 1 : 1 fashion to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily, or placebo, all with low-dose aspirin, and followed them for a median of 33 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety endpoint was TIMI major bleeding.

RESULTS

Both doses of ticagrelor significantly reduced the primary combined efficacy endpoint compared to placebo with Kaplan-Meier rates at 3 years of 7.85 % with ticagrelor 90 mg, 7.77 % with ticagrelor 60 mg, and 9.04 % with placebo (HR for ticagrelor 90 mg vs placebo 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.96, p = 0.0080; HR for ticagrelor 60 mg vs placebo 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, p = 0.0043). Rates of TIMI major bleeding were higher with ticagrelor (2.60 % for 90 mg, 2.30 % for 60 mg and 1.06 % for placebo, p < 0.001 for each dose against placebo); the rates of intracranial hemorrhage or fatal bleeding were 0.63 %, 0.71 % and 0.60 % in the 3 arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients more than 1 year after a myocardial infarction with ticagrelor reduces the risk of cardi-ovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and increases the risk of major bleeding.Key words: myocardial infarction - secondary prevention - ticagrelor.

[Combination treatment of hypertension in 2015]

We present an overview of the present views on combination treatment and on fixed combinations in the treatment of hypertension according to guidelines of ESH/ESC and ČSH from 2013. The most frequently recommended dual combinations include a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (ACEI or sartan) and a calcium channel blocker, and further a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system and a diuretic and a calcium channel blocker and a diuretic. In 2014 a fixed-dose combination of an ACE inhibitor (perindopril), a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) and an diuretic (indapamide) appeared on the Czech market. Within the PIANIST study including 4 731 insufficiently controlled hypertensives, a fixed-dose triple combination of perindopril, amlodipine and indapamide led to a decrease in blood pressure by 28.3/13.8 mm Hg and to a sufficient control of hypertension in 92 % of patients. The advantage of fixed combinations primarily consists in greater compliance of patients and thereby in a better control of hypertension. About 1/3 of hypertensives need a triple combination for a satisfactory blood pressure control.

[Inhibition of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in heart failure, or from CONSENSUS to PARADIGM-HF]

An historical survey is presented of mortality trials on angiotensin-aldosteron system inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure. From the CONSENSUS trial up to the PARADIGM-HF trial, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AT1-blockers, ARBs, sartans), along with mineralocorticoid receptor blockers, have been the gold standard of treatment. Both direct renin blocker aliskiren and dual blocker enalapril + neprilysin proved ineffective; on the other hand, the new dual inhibitor valsartan + neprilysin LCZ 696 is a new and promising therapeutic agent for future treatment of chronic heart failure.

Sinus rhythm restoration and arrhythmia noninducibility are major predictors of arrhythmia-free outcome after ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The impact of restoring sinus rhythm (SR) by initial ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) is not fully established.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of SR restoration at the initial procedure and arrhythmia noninducibility at the final repeat procedure for long-term outcome.

METHODS

A total of 203 patients (22% female; age 59 ± 9 years) underwent stepwise catheter ablation for LSPAF.

RESULTS

The procedural end-point of SR restoration was achieved in 50% of patients. During follow-up (median 48 months) and after 1.7 procedures per patient, 72% of patients were free from arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs. Failure to restore SR was independently predicted by left atrial (LA) long-axis diameter ≥68 mm (relative risk [RR] 1.55, P = .03], proportion of high-voltage LA sites <20% (RR 1.62, P = .02), and left atrial appendage (LAA) atrial fibrillation cycle length (AFCL) <155 ms (RR 1.5, P = .05). Arrhythmia recurrence after the initial procedure was predicted by SR nonrestoration (RR 2.99, P <.000001) and LAA AFCL ≥155 ms (RR 1.90, P = .0002). Arrhythmia recurrence after the final procedure was predicted by SR nonrestoration at the initial procedure (RR 2.83, P = .0007), persistent AF duration ≥24 months (RR 2.74, P = .002), LAA outflow velocity <40 cm/s (RR 2.21, P = .006), and LAA AFCL ≥155 ms (RR 1.92, P = .02). In 115 patients with repeat procedure(s), failure to achieve arrhythmia noninducibility at the final procedure (19% of patients) was associated with arrhythmia recurrence (RR 8.9, P < .000001).

CONCLUSION

SR restoration at the initial procedure and arrhythmia noninducibility at the last repeat procedure were major predictors of arrhythmia-free outcome after ablation for LSPAF.

[IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (studie IMPROVE-IT)]

BACKGROUND

The IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) is evaluating the potential benefit for reduction in major cardiovascular (CV) events from the addition of ezetimibe versus placebo to 40 mg/d of simvastatin therapy in patients who present with acute coronary syndromes and have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 125 mg/dl.

METHODS

Randomized double blind clinical trial in patients with acute coronary syndrome and low cholesterol level. The simvastatin monotherapy arms LDL-C target was < 70 mg/dl, the comparison arm was simvastatin + ezetimibe. Ezetimibe was assumed to further lower LDL-C by 15 mg/dl and produce an estimated ~ 8 % to 9 % treatment effect. The primary composite end point was CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, rehospitalization for unstable angina (UA), and coronary revascularization ( 30 days postrandomization). The targeted number of events was 5,250.

RESULTS

18,144 patients were enroled with either ST segment elevation MI (STEMI, n = 5,192) or UA/non-ST segment elevation MI (UA/NSTEMI, n = 12,952) from October 2005 to July 2010. Primary endpoint occured in 2 742 patients (34.7 %) treated with simvastatin in monotherapy and in 2 572 patients (32.7 %) (p = 0.016) treated with combination. Compared to patients with coronary heart disease given the drug simvastatin plus a placebo, those given both simvastatin and the non-statin drug, ezetimibe, had a 6.4 % lower combined risk of subsequent heart attack, stroke, cardiovascular death, rehospitalization for unstable angina and procedures to restore blood flow to the heart. Heart attacks alone were reduced by 13 %, and non-fatal stroke by 20 %. Deaths from cardiovascular disease were statistically the same in both groups. Patients were followed an average of approximately six years, and some as long as 8.5 years. Approximately 2 patients out of every 100 patients treated for 7 years avoided a heart attack or stroke [Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 50/7 years].

CONCLUSIONS

The study has shown a claer benefit from combination treatment with simvastatin and ezetimibe in patients with acute coronary syndrome and low LDL-C.

[Do natriuretic peptides have a new chance in treatment of heart failure?]

The effect of natriuretic peptides on cardiovascular and renal system offers a potential benefit in therapy of hypertension and heart failure; however the current results of clinical trials are not encouraging. Synthetic B natriuretic peptide has demonstrated short-term hemodynamic improvement in patients, but in terms of renal function and long-term prognosis the effect was questionable. Nevertheless, new hope is ularitid a dual inhibitor of neprilysin and ARB: LCZ 696, the ongoing clinical studies and previous data from pilot studies appear promising.

[Impact of natriuretic peptides in current clinical practice]

Natriuretic peptides (NP) have been intensively studied and also used in clinical practice. Their use is important for diagnosis and risk stratification of heart failure, pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome. For the correct interpretation of the results is necessary to know factors, which induce elevation of natriuretic peptides. The article shows an overview of the physiology of the NP, the factors that influence the levels of NP, like heart failure, acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism etc. There is also mentioned possibility of using synthetic derivates of natriuretic peptides in therapy of heart failure.

ECG in patients with acute heart failure can predict in-hospital and long-term mortality

Initial risk stratification in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is poorly validated. Previous studies tended to evaluate the prognostic significance of only one or two selected ECG parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of multiple ECG parameters on mortality in AHF. The Acute Heart Failure Database (AHEAD) registry collected data from 4,153 patients admitted for AHF to seven hospitals with Catheter Laboratory facilities. Clinical variables, heart rate, duration of QRS, QT and QTC intervals, type of rhythm and ST-T segment changes on admission were collected in a web-based database. 12.7 % patients died during hospitalisation, the remainder were discharged and followed for a median of 16.2 months. The most important parameters were a prolonged QRS and a junctional rhythm, which independently predict both in-hospital mortality [QRS > 100 ms, odds ratio (OR) 1.329, 95 % CI 1.052-1.680; junctional rhythm, OR 3.715, 95 % CI 1.748-7.896] and long-term mortality (QRS > 120 ms, OR 1.428, 95 % CI 1.160-1.757; junctional rhythm, OR 2.629, 95 % CI 1.538-4.496). Increased hospitalisation mortality is predicted by ST segment elevation (OR 1.771, 95 % CI 1.383-2.269) and prolonged QTC interval >475 ms (OR 1.483, 95 % CI 1.016-2.164). Presence of atrial fibrillation and bundle branch block is associated with increased unadjusted long-term mortality, but mostly reflects more advanced heart disease, and their predictive significance is attenuated in the multivariate analysis. ECG in patients admitted for acute heart failure carries significant short- and long-term prognostic information, and should be carefully evaluated.

[Dynamics of interleukin 6 levels in the patients with cardiogenic and septic shock and in a control group of patients with uncomplicated AMI]

INTRODUCTION

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Inflammatory response seems to be common response in patients with AMI, especially those with CS. We have therefore conducted a study to determine diagnostic and prognostic utility of interleukin 6 (IL6) levels in the cohort of patients with cardiogenic and septic shock (SS) and in a control group of patients with uncomplicated AMI.

METHODS

In this prospective study 71 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 30 patients with cardiogenic shock, 21 patients with septic shock and 20 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Plasma levels of IL6 were measured at 8 time points. The main endpoint was 3 month mortality.

RESULTS

We have shown that the highest IL6 levels during the first week were recorded in patients with septic shock with peak value at admission. The maximum level of IL6 was detected between 12 to 24 hours after the onset of MI among patients with cardiogenic shock. According to Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics levels of IL6 > 357 pg/ml at admission (AUC 0.730, p = 0.031) were typical for patients with CS in comparison with control group of STEMI patients. Values of IL6 > 1 237 pg/ml at admission and > 1 071 pg/ml at 24 hours (after admission?) were typical for thouse in septic shock in comparison with CS patients. We found only a non-significant trend of IL6 for the prediction of mortality in the cohort of CS patients for levels 1 854 pg/ml (AUC 0.769, p = 0.066) sampled 12 hours after admission. There was no association of plasma levels of IL6 with mortality in septic shock patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cardiogenic shock demonstrated more pronounced cytokine response as evidenced by increased levels of IL6 compared to patients with uncomplicated STEMI. Levels of IL6 peaked in SS patients at admission, in CS patients 12-24 hours after admission. In daily clinical practice routine measurement of IL6 levels for prediction of prognosis both in cardiogenic and septic shock are of little value mainly due to significant interindividual variability of IL6 values.

Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Edoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven antithrombotic effects. The long-term efficacy and safety of edoxaban as compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation is not known.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing two once-daily regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in 21,105 patients with moderate-to-high-risk atrial fibrillation (median follow-up, 2.8 years). The primary efficacy end point was stroke or systemic embolism. Each edoxaban regimen was tested for noninferiority to warfarin during the treatment period. The principal safety end point was major bleeding.

RESULTS

The annualized rate of the primary end point during treatment was 1.50% with warfarin (median time in the therapeutic range, 68.4%), as compared with 1.18% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.99; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 1.07; 97.5% CI, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.005 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a trend favoring high-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 0.87; 97.5% CI, 0.73 to 1.04; P=0.08) and an unfavorable trend with low-dose edoxaban versus warfarin (hazard ratio, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.96 to 1.34; P=0.10). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.43% with warfarin versus 2.75% with high-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; P<0.001) and 1.61% with low-dose edoxaban (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55; P<0.001). The corresponding annualized rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 3.17% versus 2.74% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), and 2.71% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.008), and the corresponding rates of the key secondary end point (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes) were 4.43% versus 3.85% (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.96; P=0.005), and 4.23% (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Both once-daily regimens of edoxaban were noninferior to warfarin with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and were associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and death from cardiovascular causes. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00781391.).