Yodrabum N, Tianrungroj J, Sinmaroeng C, Rudeejaroonrung K, Pavavongsak K, Puncreobutr C. How Is a Cutting Guide With Additional Anatomical References Better in Fibular-Free Flap Mandibular Reconstruction? A Technical Strategy.
J Craniofac Surg 2024;
35:63-66. [PMID:
37681999 DOI:
10.1097/scs.0000000000009740]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Computer-assisted surgery is used to design and manufacture cutting guides in mandibular reconstructions with fibula-free flaps. To improve the outcomes of the procedure, the aim of this research was to investigate and compare the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction following the use of 2 versus 3 anatomical reference cutting guides.
METHODS
Eighteen sets of prototype bone models retrieved from an ameloblastoma patient were used for mock operations. The mandibular segmental osteotomies and fibular reconstructions were performed using 2 and 3 anatomical reference cutting guides in vivo surgeries. After reconstruction, the accuracy of the placed reference points was measured by superimposition of computed tomography images.
RESULTS
The error in cutting guides when using 2 or 3 anatomical references showed no significant difference. The fibular and condylar errors of the cutting guide between 2 and 3 anatomical references showed no significant difference in every plate type. The difference in screw hole position errors between 2 and 3 anatomical reference cutting guides was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Two anatomical reference cutting guides are sufficient and reasonable enough for mandible resection. However, there were some limitations and errors in our study.
Collapse