1
|
Molnar MZ, Azhar A, Tsujita M, Talwar M, Balaraman V, Bhalla A, Podila PSB, Kothadia J, Agbim UA, Maliakkal B, Satapathy SK, Kovesdy CP, Nair S, Eason JD. Transplantation of Kidneys From Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Donors to Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Recipients: One-Year Kidney Allograft Outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 77:739-747.e1. [PMID: 33333148 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Transplant centers in the United States are increasingly willing to transplant kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected (HCV+) donors into HCV- recipients. We studied the association between donor HCV infection status and kidney allograft function and posttransplantation allograft biopsy findings. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS We examined 65 HCV- recipients who received a kidney from a HCV+ donor and 59 HCV- recipients who received a kidney from a HCV- donor during 2018 at a single transplant center. EXPOSURE Predictor(s) of donor infection with HCV. OUTCOMES Kidney allograft function and allograft biopsy findings during the first year following transplantation. ANALYTICAL APPROACH We compared estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), findings on for-cause and surveillance protocol biopsies, development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and patient and allograft outcomes during the first year following transplantation between recipients of HCV+ and HCV- kidneys. We used linear regression to estimate the independent association between allograft function and HCV viremic status of the kidney donor. RESULTS The mean age of recipients was 52 ± 11 (SD) years, 43% were female, 19% and 80% of recipients were White and Black, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between the HCV+ and HCV- groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the HCV+ and HCV- groups in delayed graft function rates (12% vs 8%, respectively); eGFRs at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-transplantation; proportions of patients with cellular rejection (6% vs 7%, respectively); and proportions with antibody-mediated rejection (7% vs 10%, respectively) or de novo DSAs (31% vs 20%, respectively). HCV viremic status was not associated with eGFR at 3, 6, 9, or 12 months. LIMITATIONS Generalizability from a single-center study and small sample size was limited. CONCLUSIONS Recipients of kidneys from donors infected with HCV had similar kidney allograft function and probability of rejection in the first year after transplantation compared to those who received kidneys from donors without HCV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miklos Z Molnar
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| | - Ambreen Azhar
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Makoto Tsujita
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Manish Talwar
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Vasanthi Balaraman
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Anshul Bhalla
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Pradeep S B Podila
- Faith and Health Division, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, Memphis, TN; Division of Health Systems Management and Policy, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
| | - Jiten Kothadia
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Uchenna A Agbim
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Benedict Maliakkal
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Department of Medicine, Sandra Atlas Bass Center for Liver Diseases and Transplantation, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University, Northshore University Hospital/Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
| | - Csaba P Kovesdy
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; Nephrology Section, Memphis Veterans' Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Satheesh Nair
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | - James D Eason
- James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|