Redesigning the First Prenatal Visit: A Quality Improvement Initiative

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

In an era of rising maternal mortality, a thorough first prenatal visit is essential; however, in our clinic we confirmed that many important topics were not being addressed. To rectify this problem, we redesigned the first prenatal visit to improve the coverage of topics, collect social determinants of health, increase patient access, and maintain patient satisfaction.

METHODS

We designed a quality improvement project to improve the first prenatal visit in a faculty obstetrics and gynecology clinic. To assess effectiveness, data before and after the implementation were compared. The intervention divided the first prenatal visit into two patient encounters: a nurse-led telemedicine visit and an in-person visit with an obstetric clinician.

RESULTS

The median percentage of topics covered in the first prenatal visit increased from 70.0% to 95.6%, and improvements were observed for all key themes ( p < .001). Social determinants of health was routinely collected postintervention (98.8%). A reduction in no-shows (9.9%-4.2%) improved patient access for all patients. Patient satisfaction for the first prenatal visit remained unchanged ( p = .370).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant improvements in addressing important topics at the first prenatal visit are achievable by separating one prenatal visit into two visits while increasing patient access and maintaining high patient satisfaction.

The Effect of Hormonal Contraception Use on Ovarian Reserve Markers and the Uptake of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Individuals Seeking an Infertility Evaluation

Background and objective The effects of hormonal contraception (HC) use on ovarian reserve (OR) markers in individuals seeking an infertility evaluation and the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) warrant further investigation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine if women seeking an evaluation for unexplained infertility who used long-term (≥2 years) HC have lower ovarian reserve (OR) markers and higher uptake of ART compared to short-term (<2 years) or never HC users. Methods We performed a cross-sectional patient survey involving a retrospective medical chart review of patients seeking an evaluation for unexplained infertility at the University of Colorado Advanced Reproductive Medicine (CU ARM) clinic. Results Most participants (87%; 107/123) reported a history of HC use with 98 (79.7%) reporting long-term continuous use for two or more years. Median OR markers were similar between long-term and short-term/never HC users [anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): 2.4 vs. 3.2, p=0.20; antral follicle count (AFC): 18 vs. 26, p=0.10; follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH): 7.6 vs. 6.3, p=0.26] and remained so after adjusting for age and diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) or primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) in linear regression models. However, among HC users aged less than 30 years (n=9), those who had discontinued HC between two and three years prior to the assessment of their OR markers had a 6.20 ng/mL increase in AMH level compared to those who had discontinued HC less than two years prior to the assessment (p=0.02). Additionally, there was a marginally increased use of ART overall among long-term HC users compared to short-term/never HC users (64.3% vs. 44.0%, p=0.06), specifically in the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) (58.7% vs. 18.2%, p=0.01). Among long-term HC users, ovulation induction was less likely to result in live birth compared to short-term/never HC users (8.9% vs. 62.5%, p<0.001); however, after adjusting for age, PCOS, POI, and type of ART used, there was no difference in the odds of live birth after ART between long-term HC users and short-term/never users. Conclusion While long-term HC users report increased use of ART, in particular IVF, the overall conception rates and live birth outcomes among ART users do not appear to be significantly affected by a history of long-term HC use.

Changing Characteristics of Children With COVID-19 in Colorado Admitted During Different Variant Periods

BACKGROUND

Data are lacking on the impact of different severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants in children and on pediatric vaccine effectiveness. We examined differences among children requiring hospital admission associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during wild type, Delta and Omicron variant periods and calculated vaccine effectiveness at preventing symptomatic hospitalization during the Delta and Omicron variant periods.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of children younger than 21 years of age hospitalized with symptomatic COVID-19. Characteristics were compared between variant periods using Kruskal-Wallis or generalized Fisher exact tests. We estimated vaccine effectiveness in preventing symptomatic hospitalization.

RESULTS

We included 115 children admitted during the wild type period, 194 during Delta and 226 during the Omicron periods. Median age (years) decreased (12.2 wild type, 5.9 Delta, 1.3 Omicron periods, P < 0.0001) over time. Children were less likely to have a comorbid condition, including diabetes or obesity, and had shorter admissions during Omicron compared with the wild type and Delta periods. Intensive care unit admissions and respiratory support requirements were highest during the Delta period (P = 0.05). Among children ≥12 years, adjusted vaccine effectiveness at preventing symptomatic hospitalization was 86% during Delta and 45% during Omicron periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Children hospitalized with COVID-19 during later variant periods were younger and less likely to have comorbidities. Children admitted during the Delta variant period required more intensive care and respiratory support compared to other variant periods. Vaccination was less effective at preventing symptomatic hospital admission during the Omicron period compared to the Delta period.

Does Lymph Node Dissection Impact Adjuvant Treatment or Survival Outcomes in High-Risk Endometrial Cancers?

Objectives Lymphadenectomy does not improve overall survival outcomes in patients with low-risk endometrial cancers. Sentinel node mapping has a high detection rate and accuracy; however, its prognostic implications have not been well explored. We evaluated the overall survival and therapies received by patients undergoing varied lymph node dissection approaches for high-risk endometrial cancers. Methods Retrospective review of grade 3 endometrioid and high-grade non-endometrioid cancers at one institution over ten years. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and/or debulking of only grossly abnormal lymph nodes were excluded. Data was abstracted from electronic medical records. Chi-squared tests and survival analyses were used to compare groups. Results One hundred and fifty-three patients with grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, or mixed high-grade on final pathology were identified; 16 had no lymph node dissection, 26 had sentinel lymph nodes, and 111 had complete lymph node dissection. Patients with open surgery were more likely to have complete nodes than sentinel nodes when compared to a minimally invasive approach (p<0.001). Sentinel nodal dissection significantly impacted the utilization of, or modality choice, in adjuvant therapy (p=0.051). Recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific overall survival were not significantly different across the three nodal-assessment groups. Conclusions  Sentinel lymph node dissection in high-risk endometrial cancers led to no significant differences in recurrence-free survival or cancer-specific overall survival. While limited by sample size and its retrospective nature, results from this single-institution study are hypothesis-generating and prompt consideration of non-inferiority trials. Performing the least invasive surgery possibly can lead to fewer complications while maintaining overall survival outcomes.