Clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients colonized or infected by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia : is resistance to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim a problem?

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen in the last decade. Increased resistance to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) has been reported in S. maltophilia strains in the past few years, leading to few therapeutic options. We conducted a prospective multicenter study at two Brazilian teaching hospitals that identified S. maltophilia isolates and evaluated their antimicrobial susceptibility profile, SMX/TMP resistance genes and their clonality profile. A total of 106 non-repeated clinical samples of S. maltophilia were evaluated. Resistance to SMX/TMP was identified in 21.6% of the samples, and previous use of SMX/TMP occurred in 19 (82.6%). PCR detected the sul1 gene in 14 of 106 strains (13.2%). Of these isolates, nine displayed resistance to SMX/TMP. The resistant strains presented a polyclonal profile. This opportunistic pathogen has emerged in immunocompromised hosts, with few therapeutic options, which is aggravated by the description of emerging resistance mechanisms, although with a polyclonal distribution profile.

Multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Description of new MLST profiles and resistance and virulence genes using whole-genome sequencing

OBJECTIVES

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen that has high intrinsic and acquired antimicrobial resistance, with great genetic diversity. The aim of this study was to characterise four S. maltophilia clinical isolates displaying different susceptibility profiles using whole-genome sequencing.

METHODS

The whole genomes of four clinical isolates of S. maltophilia from three patients were sequenced using Ion Torrent™ PGM technology. The isolates presented different susceptibilities to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) and levofloxacin.

RESULTS

Three new multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiles were identified (ST144, ST172 and ST173), differing in virulence and resistance genes. The ST172 isolate had more genes related to toxins than related to motility or adhesion and had different types of efflux pumps than the other isolates. The SXT-resistant strains belonged to ST172 or ST144 and did not harbour the sul1, sul2 or dfrA resistance genes. Strains I and II, from the same patient and belonging to the same ST but differing in resistance to SXT, had all of the resistance genes searched for in common, except for the SmeABC efflux pump complex genes that were only found in the SXT-resistant strain. All strains, including the strain susceptible to levofloxacin, harboured the qnrB gene, which may question the importance of this gene in determining levofloxacin resistance in S. maltophilia.

CONCLUSION

Here we describe three new MLST profiles. Resistance to SXT in these strains appears to be associated with efflux pumps.