1
|
Pennings AJ, van der Velden BA, Kloft M, Kooreman LFS, Kleijnen JMP, Breukink SO, Beets GL, Grabsch HI, Melenhorst J. The Role of Nonmetastatic Lymph Nodes in the Survival of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Open 2023; 4:e336. [PMID: 38144501 PMCID: PMC10735087 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective In this review, we aim to provide an overview of literature on lymph node (LN) histomorphological features and their relationship with the prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Background Lymph nodes play a crucial role in the treatment and prognosis of CRC. The presence of LN metastases considerably worsens the prognosis in CRC patients. Literature has shown that the total number of LNs and the number negative LNs (LNnegs) has prognostic value in CRC patients. In esophageal carcinoma, LN size seems to be surrogate of the host antitumor response and a potentially clinically useful new prognostic biomarker for (y)pN0 esophageal carcinoma. Methods A comprehensive search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library in March 2021. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Only studies focusing on histomorphological features and LN size and their relation to overall survival were selected. Results A total of 9 unique articles met all inclusion criteria and were therefore included in this systematic review. Six of these studies investigated HMF (eg, paracortical hyperplasia, germinal center predominance, and sinus histiocytosis) and 4 studies LNneg size and their relationship with overall survival. The presence of paracortical hyperplasia and an increased number of large LNnegs is related to a more favorable prognosis in CRC. Conclusion The results of this systematic review seem to support the hypothesis that there is a relationship between the host antitumor response reflected in different histomorphological reaction patterns visible in LNnegs and LNneg size related to survival in CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J. Pennings
- From the Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Brecht A. van der Velden
- NUTRIM, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Kloft
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Justus-Liebig-University, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany
| | - Loes F. S. Kooreman
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jos M. P. Kleijnen
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie O. Breukink
- From the Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Geerard L. Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heike I. Grabsch
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jarno Melenhorst
- From the Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Groot JJA, Ament SMC, Maessen JMC, Dejong CHC, Kleijnen JMP, Slangen BFM. Enhanced recovery pathways in abdominal gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 95:382-95. [PMID: 26613531 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced recovery pathways have been widely accepted and implemented for different types of surgery. Their overall effect in abdominal gynecologic surgery is still underdetermined. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to provide an overview of current evidence and to examine their effect on postoperative outcomes in women undergoing open gynecologic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Searches were conducted using Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library up to 27 June 2014. Reference lists were screened to identify additional studies. Studies were included if at least four individual items of an enhanced recovery pathway were described. Outcomes included length of hospital stay, complication rates, readmissions, and mortality. Quantitative analysis was limited to comparative studies. Effect sizes were presented as relative risks or as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Thirty-one records, involving 16 observational studies, were included. Diversity in reported elements within studies was observed. Preoperative education, early oral intake, and early mobilization were included in all pathways. Five studies, with a high risk of bias, were eligible for quantitative analysis. Enhanced recovery pathways reduced primary (MD -1.57 days, 95% CI CI -2.94 to -0.20) and total (MD -3.05 days, 95% CI -4.87 to -1.23) length of hospital stay compared with traditional perioperative care, without an increase in complications, mortality or readmission rates. CONCLUSION The available evidence based on a broad range of non-randomized studies at high risk of bias suggests that enhanced recovery pathways may reduce length of postoperative hospital stay in abdominal gynecologic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanny J A de Groot
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie M C Ament
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - José M C Maessen
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Patient & Integrated Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,NUTRIM, School for Nutrition, Toxicology, and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos M P Kleijnen
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|