Conventional single-chamber pacemakers versus transcatheter pacing systems in a "real world" cohort of patients: A comparative prospective single-center study

Purpose

Despite the developments in conventional transvenous pacemakers (VVI-PM), the procedure is still associated with significant complications. Although there are no prospective clinical trials that compared VVI-PM with transcatheter pacemaker systems (TPS).

Methods

This is a prospective, observational, single-center study that included all patients with an indication for a single-chamber pacemaker implant within a 4-year period. All clinical, ECG and echocardiographic characteristics at implant, electrical parameters, associated complications and mortality were analyzed. A Cox survival model and a Bayesian cohort analysis were performed for differences in complication rates between groups.

Results

There were 443 patients included (198 TPS and 245 VVI-PM). The mean age was 81.5 years (TPS group, 79.2 ± 6.6 years; VVI-PM group, 83.5 ± 8.9 years). There was a male predominance in TPS group (123, 62.1% vs. 67, 27.3%; p < 0.001). The presence of systolic dysfunction and renal insufficiency were more frequent in VVI-PM group than in TPS patients. Mean follow-up was 22.3 ± 15.9 months. In a multivariable paired data the TPS group presented fewer complications than VVI-PM group (HR = 0.39 [0.15–0.98], p-value 0.013), but major complications were not different (6, 3% vs 14, 5.6% respectively, p = 0.1761). There was no difference in the mortality rate between the groups. The TPS group had less risk than VVI-PM group to have a complication, with a 96% of probability.

Conclusions

TPS patients had a lower overall complication rate than VVI-PM patients including matched-pair samples using a Bayesian analysis. These results confirm the safety profile of TPS in clinical practice.

Left atrial enlargement and NT-proBNP as predictors of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure

AIMS

The identification of valuable markers of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with established HF remains a challenge. We sought to assess the value of clinical, echocardiographic and biochemical variables to predict SCD in a consecutive cohort of patients with heart failure (HF) due to systolic dysfunction.

METHODS

A cohort of 494 patients with established HF had baseline echocardiographic and NT-proBNP measurements and were followed for 942+/-323 days.

RESULTS

Fifty patients suffered SCD. Independent predictors of SCD were indexed LA size>26 mm/m2 (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.0; p=0.0007), NT-proBNP>908 ng/L (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5-6.7; p=0.003), history of myocardial infarction (HR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.1; p=0.007), peripheral oedema (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-3.9; p=0.02), and diabetes mellitus (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.3; p=0.03). NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction and glomerular filtration rate were not independent predictors of SCD in this cohort. Notably, the combination of both LA size>26 mm/m2 and NT-proBNP>908 ng/L increased the risk of SCD (HR 4.3; 95% CI 2.5-7.6; p<0.0001). At 36 months, risk of SCD in patients with indexed LA size<or=26 mm/m2 and NT-proBNP<or=908 ng/L was 3%, while in patients with indexed LA size>26 mm/m2 and NT-proBNP>908 ng/L reached 25% (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among HF patients, indexed LA size and NT-proBNP levels are more useful to stratify risk of SCD than other clinical, echocardiographic or biochemical variables. The combination of these two parameters should be considered for predicting SCD in patients with HF.