Use of Contraceptive Methods Among Women in the General Population and Female Gynecologists in Spain: the ELEGIAN Survey

Background

The contraceptive preferences of obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) are thought to influence the contraceptive counseling they provide. The purpose of this study was to assess contraceptive preferences of OB/GYNs and women in the general population (WGP) in the current Spanish contraceptive scenario.

Materials and Methods

Anonymous online survey of 100 OB/GYNs and 1,217 WGP aged 23-49 years.

Results

WGP were younger (35.3 ± 7.3 vs. 37.9 ± 6.2 years, respectively) and less likely to have stable partners (64.7% vs. 84.0%) and children (49.1% vs. 62.0%) (all p < 0.05 vs. OB/GYNs). Seventy-nine percent versus 82%, respectively, used contraceptive methods, with condoms used most frequently by WGP (37% vs. 22% by OB/GYNs; p < 0.05) and pills by OB/GYNs (26% vs. 21% by WGP; p > 0.05). Intrauterine devices (IUDs) were more frequently used by OB/GYNs (20% vs. 5%; p < 0.05), especially the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs) (18% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.05). The highest-rated methods were condoms among WGP and LNG-IUDs among OB/GYNs. Effectiveness was the most valued attribute of contraceptive methods for both. Reasons related to convenience were the main reason for choosing IUDs. OB/GYNs prescribed the contraceptive method in 40% of cases.

Conclusions

Our study reveals differences between female OB/GYNs and WGP in contraceptive methods use and rating. The use of LNG-IUDs was much higher among OB/GYNs.

Sensitivity to Change of the SAMANTA Questionnaire, a Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Diagnostic Tool, After 1 Year of Hormonal Treatment

Background: The validated SAMANTA questionnaire allows identification of women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB); that is, with excessive menstrual bleeding that interferes with quality of life (QoL). We assessed its value for monitoring HMB treatment in clinical practice. Material and Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted between December 2018 and March 2021 in consecutively recruited women with HMB attending gynecologists' offices who started a hormonal treatment. Sociodemographic characteristics were recorded at enrollment. At baseline and month 12, we assessed the HMB (SAMANTA questionnaire), the global impression of menstrual bleeding severity in patients (PGI-S) and clinicians (CGI-S), and the QoL (SF36). At month 12, we assessed the global impression of menstrual bleeding change in patients (PGI-C) and clinicians (CGI-C). Changes in SAMANTA questionnaire score at month 12 were compared with the presence of amenorrhea and changes in blood loss, menstrual period duration, and PGI-S, PGI-C, CGI-S, and CGI-C. Results: The study included 371 women aged 41.2 ± 6.5 years, 87% of whom were using the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. The SAMANTA questionnaire score significantly decreased in 97.3% of women. The decrease was greater in women reporting a reduction in blood loss, shorter menstrual bleeding duration, or a strong improvement in menstrual bleeding severity (PGI-S and CGI-S) or amount (PGI-C and CGI-C) (p < 0.001 for all), but not amenorrhea. SF-36 domains improved significantly; changes being inversely associated with changes in the SAMANTA questionnaire score. Conclusions: The SAMANTA questionnaire seems a valuable tool for monitoring hormonal treatment for HMB. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03751800.