1
|
Karagozoglu KH, Mahraoui A, Bot JCJ, Cha S, Ho JPTF, Helder MN, Brand HS, Bartelink IH, Vissink A, Weisman GA, Jager DHJ. Intraoperative Visualization and Treatment of Salivary Gland Dysfunction in Sjögren's Syndrome Patients Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Sialendoscopy (CEUSS). J Clin Med 2023; 12:4152. [PMID: 37373845 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In sialendoscopy, ducts are dilated and the salivary glands are irrigated with saline. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound sialendoscopy (CEUSS), using microbubbles, may facilitate the monitoring of irrigation solution penetration in the ductal system and parenchyma. It is imperative to test CEUSS for its safety and feasibility in Sjögren's syndrome (SS) patients. CEUSS was performed on 10 SS patients. The primary outcomes were safety, determined by the occurrence of (serious) adverse events ((S)AEs), and feasibility. The secondary outcomes were unstimulated and stimulated whole saliva (UWS and SWS) flow rates, xerostomia inventory (XI), clinical oral dryness score, pain, EULAR Sjögren's syndrome patient reported index (ESSPRI), and gland topographical alterations. CEUSS was technically feasible in all patients. Neither SAEs nor systemic reactions related to the procedure were observed. The main AEs were postoperative pain (two patients) and swelling (two patients). Eight weeks after CEUSS, the median UWS and SWS flow had increased significantly from 0.10 to 0.22 mL/min (p = 0.028) and 0.41 to 0.61 mL/min (p = 0.047), respectively. Sixteen weeks after CEUSS, the mean XI was reduced from 45.2 to 34.2 (p = 0.02). We conclude that CEUSS is a safe and feasible treatment for SS patients. It has the potential to increase salivary secretion and reduce xerostomia, but this needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Hakki Karagozoglu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Anissa Mahraoui
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph C J Bot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Seunghee Cha
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Sciences, Center for Orphaned Autoimmune Disorders, University of Florida, 1395 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Jean-Pierre T F Ho
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marco N Helder
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Henk S Brand
- Department of Oral Biochemistry, Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081 LA Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Imke H Bartelink
- Department of Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1018 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Vissink
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gary A Weisman
- Department of Biochemistry, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, 1201 Rollins St, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
| | - Derk Hendrik Jan Jager
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Inflammatory Diseases, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slagboom TNA, Stenvers DJ, van de Giessen E, Roosendaal SD, de Win MML, Bot JCJ, Aronica E, Post R, Hoogmoed J, Drent ML, Pereira AM. Continuing Challenges in the Definitive Diagnosis of Cushing's Disease: A Structured Review Focusing on Molecular Imaging and a Proposal for Diagnostic Work-Up. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082919. [PMID: 37109254 PMCID: PMC10144206 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The definitive diagnosis of Cushing's disease (CD) in the presence of pituitary microadenoma remains a continuous challenge. Novel available pituitary imaging techniques are emerging. This study aimed to provide a structured analysis of the diagnostic accuracy as well as the clinical use of molecular imaging in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome (CS). We also discuss the role of multidisciplinary counseling in decision making. Additionally, we propose a complementary diagnostic algorithm for both de novo and recurrent or persistent CD. A structured literature search was conducted and two illustrative CD cases discussed at our Pituitary Center are presented. A total of 14 CD (n = 201) and 30 ectopic CS (n = 301) articles were included. MRI was negative or inconclusive in a quarter of CD patients. 11C-Met showed higher pituitary adenoma detection than 18F-FDG PET-CT (87% versus 49%). Up to 100% detection rates were found for 18F-FET, 68Ga-DOTA-TATE, and 68Ga-DOTA-CRH, but were based on single studies. The use of molecular imaging modalities in the detection of pituitary microadenoma in ACTH-dependent CS is of added and complementary value, serving as one of the available tools in the diagnostic work-up. In selected CD cases, it seems justified to even refrain from IPSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa N A Slagboom
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan Stenvers
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elsmarieke van de Giessen
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan D Roosendaal
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje M L de Win
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph C J Bot
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora Aronica
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of (Neuro)Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - René Post
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jantien Hoogmoed
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madeleine L Drent
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto M Pereira
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Pituitary Center Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bot JCJ, Mazzai L, Hagenbeek RE, Ingala S, van Oosten B, Sanchez-Aliaga E, Barkhof F. Response: Brain miliary enhancement. Neuroradiology 2020; 62:547. [PMID: 32215682 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02404-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C J Bot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Linda Mazzai
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine (DiMED), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Ingala
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bob van Oosten
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Sanchez-Aliaga
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bot JCJ, Mazzai L, Hagenbeek RE, Ingala S, van Oosten B, Sanchez-Aliaga E, Barkhof F. Brain miliary enhancement. Neuroradiology 2020; 62:283-300. [PMID: 31925469 PMCID: PMC7044143 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-019-02335-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Miliary enhancement refers to the presence of multiple small, monomorphic, enhancing foci on T1-weighted post-contrast MRI images. In the absence of a clear clinical presentation, a broad differential diagnosis may result in invasive procedures and possibly brain biopsy for diagnostic purposes. Methods An extensive review of the literature is provided for diseases that may present with miliary enhancement on T1-weighted brain MR images. Additional disease-specific findings, both clinical and radiological, are summarized and categorized by the presence or absence of perivascular space involvement. Results Miliary pattern of enhancement may be due to a variety of underlying causes, including inflammatory, infectious, nutritional or neoplastic processes. The recognition of disease spread along the perivascular spaces in addition to the detection or exclusion of disease-specific features on MRI images, such as leptomeningeal enhancement, presence of haemorrhagic lesions, spinal cord involvement and specific localisation or systemic involvement, allows to narrow the potential differential diagnoses. Conclusion A systematic approach to disease-specific findings from both clinical and radiological perspectives might facilitate diagnostic work-up, and recognition of disease spread along the perivascular spaces may help narrowing down differential diagnoses and may help to minimize the use of invasive diagnostic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C J Bot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Linda Mazzai
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine (DiMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Ingala
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bob van Oosten
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Sanchez-Aliaga
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Visser M, Müller DMJ, van Duijn RJM, Smits M, Verburg N, Hendriks EJ, Nabuurs RJA, Bot JCJ, Eijgelaar RS, Witte M, van Herk MB, Barkhof F, de Witt Hamer PC, de Munck JC. Inter-rater agreement in glioma segmentations on longitudinal MRI. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 22:101727. [PMID: 30825711 PMCID: PMC6396436 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Tumor segmentation of glioma on MRI is a technique to monitor, quantify and report disease progression. Manual MRI segmentation is the gold standard but very labor intensive. At present the quality of this gold standard is not known for different stages of the disease, and prior work has mainly focused on treatment-naive glioblastoma. In this paper we studied the inter-rater agreement of manual MRI segmentation of glioblastoma and WHO grade II-III glioma for novices and experts at three stages of disease. We also studied the impact of inter-observer variation on extent of resection and growth rate. Methods In 20 patients with WHO grade IV glioblastoma and 20 patients with WHO grade II-III glioma (defined as non-glioblastoma) both the enhancing and non-enhancing tumor elements were segmented on MRI, using specialized software, by four novices and four experts before surgery, after surgery and at time of tumor progression. We used the generalized conformity index (GCI) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of tumor volume as main outcome measures for inter-rater agreement. Results For glioblastoma, segmentations by experts and novices were comparable. The inter-rater agreement of enhancing tumor elements was excellent before surgery (GCI 0.79, ICC 0.99) poor after surgery (GCI 0.32, ICC 0.92), and good at progression (GCI 0.65, ICC 0.91). For non-glioblastoma, the inter-rater agreement was generally higher between experts than between novices. The inter-rater agreement was excellent between experts before surgery (GCI 0.77, ICC 0.92), was reasonable after surgery (GCI 0.48, ICC 0.84), and good at progression (GCI 0.60, ICC 0.80). The inter-rater agreement was good between novices before surgery (GCI 0.66, ICC 0.73), was poor after surgery (GCI 0.33, ICC 0.55), and poor at progression (GCI 0.36, ICC 0.73). Further analysis showed that the lower inter-rater agreement of segmentation on postoperative MRI could only partly be explained by the smaller volumes and fragmentation of residual tumor. The median interquartile range of extent of resection between raters was 8.3% and of growth rate was 0.22 mm/year. Conclusion Manual tumor segmentations on MRI have reasonable agreement for use in spatial and volumetric analysis. Agreement in spatial overlap is of concern with segmentation after surgery for glioblastoma and with segmentation of non-glioblastoma by non-experts. Inter-rater agreement for longitudinal glioma segmentation was determined. Agreement between 4 experts was higher than between 4 novices. Three time-points of glioblastoma (WHO IV) and diffuse glioma (WHO II-III) are studied. Impact on extent of resection and growth rate measurements was determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - D M J Müller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J M van Duijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N Verburg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Hendriks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J A Nabuurs
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J C J Bot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R S Eijgelaar
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1006 BE Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Witte
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1006 BE Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M B van Herk
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - F Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - P C de Witt Hamer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J C de Munck
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Treurniet KM, Yoo AJ, Berkhemer OA, Lingsma HF, Boers AMM, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Sprengers MES, Jenniskens SFM, Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ, van Walderveen MAA, Bot JCJ, Beenen LFM, van den Berg R, van Zwam WH, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Dippel DWJ, Roos YBWEM, Marquering HA, Majoie CBLM. Clot Burden Score on Baseline Computerized Tomographic Angiography and Intra-Arterial Treatment Effect in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2016; 47:2972-2978. [PMID: 27827328 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.014565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Revised: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A high clot burden score (CBS) is associated with favorable outcome after intravenous treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The added benefit of intra-arterial treatment might be less in these patients. The aim of this exploratory post hoc analysis was to assess the relation of CBS with neurological improvement and endovascular treatment effect. METHODS For 499 of 500 patients in the MR CLEAN study (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands), the CBS was determined. Ordinal logistic regression models with and without main baseline prognostic variables were used to assess the association between CBS (continuous or dichotomized at CBS of 6) and a shift toward better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale. The model without main baseline prognostic variables only included treatment allocation and CBS. Models with and without a multiplicative interaction term of CBS and treatment were compared using the χ2 test to assess treatment effect modification by CBS. RESULTS Higher CBS was associated with a shift toward better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale; adjusted common odds ratio per point CBS was 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.20]. Dichotomized CBS had an adjusted common odds ratio of 1.67 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.51). Both effect estimates were slightly attenuated by adding baseline prognostic variables. The addition of the interaction terms did not significantly improve the fit of the models. There was a small and insignificant increase of intra-arterial treatment efficacy in the high CBS group. CONCLUSIONS A higher CBS is associated with improved outcome and may be used as a prognostic marker. We found no evidence that CBS modifies the effect of intra-arterial treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.trialregister.nl. Unique identifier: NTR1804. URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian M Treurniet
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.).
| | - Albert J Yoo
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Olvert A Berkhemer
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Anna M M Boers
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Puck S S Fransen
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Debbie Beumer
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Lucie A van den Berg
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Marieke E S Sprengers
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Sjoerd F M Jenniskens
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Marianne A A van Walderveen
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Joseph C J Bot
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Ludo F M Beenen
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - René van den Berg
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Wim H van Zwam
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Aad van der Lugt
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Robert J van Oostenbrugge
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Diederik W J Dippel
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Yvo B W E M Roos
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Henk A Marquering
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | - Charles B L M Majoie
- From the Department of Radiology (K.M.T., O.A.B., A.M.M.B., M.E.S.S., L.F.M.B., R.v.d.B., H.A.M., C.B.L.M.M.), Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics (A.M.M.B., H.A.M.), and Department of Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas (A.J.Y.); Department of Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), Department of Public Health (H.F.L.), and Department of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.) and Department of Radiology (O.A.B., W.H.v.Z.), Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (A.M.M.B.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (S.F.M.J.); Department of Radiology, MC Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands (G.J.L.À.N.); Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.A.A.v.W.); and Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (J.C.J.B.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoo AJ, Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, van den Berg LA, Beumer D, Lingsma HF, Schonewille WJ, Sprengers MES, van den Berg R, van Walderveen MAA, Beenen LFM, Wermer MJH, Nijeholt GJLÀ, Boiten J, Jenniskens SFM, Bot JCJ, Boers AMM, Marquering HA, Roos YBWEM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Dippel DWJ, van der Lugt A, van Zwam WH, Majoie CBLM. Effect of baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score on safety and efficacy of intra-arterial treatment: a subgroup analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial (MR CLEAN). Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:685-694. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00124-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Revised: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
8
|
van Seeters T, Biessels GJ, Kappelle LJ, van der Schaaf IC, Dankbaar JW, Horsch AD, Niesten JM, Luitse MJA, Majoie CBLM, Vos JA, Schonewille WJ, van Walderveen MAA, Wermer MJH, Duijm LEM, Keizer K, Bot JCJ, Visser MC, van der Lugt A, Dippel DWJ, Kesselring FOHW, Hofmeijer J, Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, van Rooij WJ, de Kort PLM, Roos YBWEM, Meijer FJA, Pleiter CC, Mali WPTM, van der Graaf Y, Velthuis BK. CT angiography and CT perfusion improve prediction of infarct volume in patients with anterior circulation stroke. Neuroradiology 2016; 58:327-37. [PMID: 26767380 PMCID: PMC4819789 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-015-1636-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 12/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Introduction We investigated whether baseline CT angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion (CTP) in acute ischemic stroke could improve prediction of infarct presence and infarct volume on follow-up imaging. Methods We analyzed 906 patients with suspected anterior circulation stroke from the prospective multicenter Dutch acute stroke study (DUST). All patients underwent baseline non-contrast CT, CTA, and CTP and follow-up non-contrast CT/MRI after 3 days. Multivariable regression models were developed including patient characteristics and non-contrast CT, and subsequently, CTA and CTP measures were added. The increase in area under the curve (AUC) and R2 was assessed to determine the additional value of CTA and CTP. Results At follow-up, 612 patients (67.5 %) had a detectable infarct on CT/MRI; median infarct volume was 14.8 mL (interquartile range (IQR) 2.8–69.6). Regarding infarct presence, the AUC of 0.82 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.79–0.85) for patient characteristics and non-contrast CT was improved with addition of CTA measures (AUC 0.85 (95 % CI 0.82–0.87); p < 0.001) and was even higher after addition of CTP measures (AUC 0.89 (95 % CI 0.87–0.91); p < 0.001) and combined CTA/CTP measures (AUC 0.89 (95 % CI 0.87–0.91); p < 0.001). For infarct volume, adding combined CTA/CTP measures (R2 = 0.58) was superior to patient characteristics and non-contrast CT alone (R2 = 0.44) and to addition of CTA alone (R2 = 0.55) or CTP alone (R2 = 0.54; all p < 0.001). Conclusion In the acute stage, CTA and CTP have additional value over patient characteristics and non-contrast CT for predicting infarct presence and infarct volume on follow-up imaging. These findings could be applied for patient selection in future trials on ischemic stroke treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1636-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom van Seeters
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Geert Jan Biessels
- Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L Jaap Kappelle
- Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Irene C van der Schaaf
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Dankbaar
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander D Horsch
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joris M Niesten
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Merel J A Luitse
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Albert Vos
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marieke J H Wermer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lucien E M Duijm
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koos Keizer
- Department of Neurology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph C J Bot
- Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke C Visser
- Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aad van der Lugt
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik W J Dippel
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jelis Boiten
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul L M de Kort
- Department of Neurology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Yvo B W E M Roos
- Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederick J A Meijer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willem P T M Mali
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yolanda van der Graaf
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Birgitta K Velthuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, HP E01.132 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fransen PSS, Berkhemer OA, Lingsma HF, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJH, van Walderveen MAA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PLM, van den Berg JSP, van Hasselt BAAM, Aerden LAM, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JCJ, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder THCML, Heijboer RJJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers MES, Jenniskens SFM, Beenen LFM, van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YBWEM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CBLM, van der Lugt A, Dippel DWJ. Time to Reperfusion and Treatment Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2015; 73:190-6. [PMID: 26716735 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Intra-arterial treatment (IAT) for acute ischemic stroke caused by intracranial arterial occlusion leads to improved functional outcome in patients treated within 6 hours after onset. The influence of treatment delay on treatment effect is not yet known. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of time from stroke onset to the start of treatment and from stroke onset to reperfusion on the effect of IAT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) was a multicenter, randomized clinical open-label trial of IAT vs no IAT in 500 patients. The time to the start of treatment was defined as the time from onset of symptoms to groin puncture (TOG). The time from onset of treatment to reperfusion (TOR) was defined as the time to reopening the vessel occlusion or the end of the procedure in cases for which reperfusion was not achieved. Data were collected from December 3, 2010, to June 3, 2014, and analyzed (intention to treat) from July 1, 2014, to September 19, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Main outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score for functional outcome (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). Multiple ordinal logistic regression analysis estimated the effect of treatment and tested for the interaction of time to randomization, TOG, and TOR with treatment. The effect of treatment as a risk difference on reaching independence (mRS score, 0-2) was computed as a function of TOG and TOR. Calculations were adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, previous stroke, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and intracranial arterial terminus occlusion. RESULTS Among 500 patients (58% male; median age, 67 years), the median TOG was 260 (interquartile range [IQR], 210-311) minutes; median TOR, 340 (IQR, 274-395) minutes. An interaction between TOR and treatment (P = .04) existed, but not between TOG and treatment (P = .26). The adjusted risk difference (95% CI) was 25.9% (8.3%-44.4%) when reperfusion was reached at 3 hours, 18.8% (6.6%-32.6%) at 4 hours, and 6.7% (0.4%-14.5%) at 6 hours. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE For every hour of reperfusion delay, the initially large benefit of IAT decreases; the absolute risk difference for a good outcome is reduced by 6% per hour of delay. Patients with acute ischemic stroke require immediate diagnostic workup and IAT in case of intracranial arterial vessel occlusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR1804.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puck S S Fransen
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands2Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olvert A Berkhemer
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands3Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Debbie Beumer
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jan Albert Vos
- Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J Nederkoorn
- Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke J H Wermer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Julie Staals
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jelis Boiten
- Department of Neurology, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, the Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick A Brouwer
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart J Emmer
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lukas C van Dijk
- Department of Radiology, Haga Hospital, the Hague, the Netherlands
| | - L Jaap Kappelle
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H Lo
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ewoud J van Dijk
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joost de Vries
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul L M de Kort
- Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Leo A M Aerden
- Department of Neurology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - René J Dallinga
- Department of Radiology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke C Visser
- Department of Neurology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph C J Bot
- Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick C Vroomen
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Omid Eshghi
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Roel J J Heijboer
- Department of Radiology, Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Koos Keizer
- Department of Neurology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Dick G Gerrits
- Department of Radiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Giorgos B Karas
- Department of Radiology, St Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Zwenneke Flach
- Department of Neurology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Henk A Marquering
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands39Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd F M Jenniskens
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ludo F M Beenen
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - René van den Berg
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter J Koudstaal
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Zwam
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvo B W E M Roos
- Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J van Oostenbrugge
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Aad van der Lugt
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diederik W J Dippel
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJH, van Walderveen MAA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PLM, van Rooij WJJ, van den Berg JSP, van Hasselt BAAM, Aerden LAM, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JCJ, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder THCML, Heijboer RJJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers MES, Jenniskens SFM, Beenen LFM, van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YBWEM, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CBLM, Dippel DWJ. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:11-20. [PMID: 25517348 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1411587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4479] [Impact Index Per Article: 497.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal intracranial arterial occlusion, intraarterial treatment is highly effective for emergency revascularization. However, proof of a beneficial effect on functional outcome is lacking. METHODS We randomly assigned eligible patients to either intraarterial treatment plus usual care or usual care alone. Eligible patients had a proximal arterial occlusion in the anterior cerebral circulation that was confirmed on vessel imaging and that could be treated intraarterially within 6 hours after symptom onset. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale score at 90 days; this categorical scale measures functional outcome, with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). The treatment effect was estimated with ordinal logistic regression as a common odds ratio, adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors. The adjusted common odds ratio measured the likelihood that intraarterial treatment would lead to lower modified Rankin scores, as compared with usual care alone (shift analysis). RESULTS We enrolled 500 patients at 16 medical centers in The Netherlands (233 assigned to intraarterial treatment and 267 to usual care alone). The mean age was 65 years (range, 23 to 96), and 445 patients (89.0%) were treated with intravenous alteplase before randomization. Retrievable stents were used in 190 of the 233 patients (81.5%) assigned to intraarterial treatment. The adjusted common odds ratio was 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 2.30). There was an absolute difference of 13.5 percentage points (95% CI, 5.9 to 21.2) in the rate of functional independence (modified Rankin score, 0 to 2) in favor of the intervention (32.6% vs. 19.1%). There were no significant differences in mortality or the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal intracranial occlusion of the anterior circulation, intraarterial treatment administered within 6 hours after stroke onset was effective and safe. (Funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation and others; MR CLEAN Netherlands Trial Registry number, NTR1804, and Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN10888758.).
Collapse
|
11
|
Bleeker FE, Bot JCJ, Ronner HE, Postma TJ. [Reversible neurological deficit years after high grade glioma--the SMART syndrome]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2012; 156:A4704. [PMID: 22831493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival in patients with high grade glioma has been extended in recent years as a result of more intensive therapy. As a consequence, more late term complications of treatment may be observed. CASE DESCRIPTION A 69-year-old woman presented at the outpatient department of Neurology with headache and loss of strength in the left arm. She had been treated 7 years previously for a high grade glioma with resection and radiotherapy. One year later she had received chemotherapy for a local recurrence. Since then she was free of complaints. At investigation a left sided hemiparesis was found. As recurrence of the tumour was suspected, MR imaging of the brain was performed, which showed abnormalities suggestive for the so called 'stroke-like migraine attacks after radiotherapy' (SMART) syndrome. The further clinical course, with spontaneous recovery of strength within a few weeks and the regression of the cortical hyperintensity on MRI, confirmed the probable diagnosis. CONCLUSION The SMART syndrome is a relatively unknown condition and should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients who present with new complaints long after cerebral radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fonnet E Bleeker
- VU Medisch Centrum, Afd. Neurologie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Buis DR, Bot JCJ, Barkhof F, Knol DL, Lagerwaard FJ, Slotman BJ, Vandertop WP, van den Berg R. The predictive value of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in assessment of brain arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 33:232-8. [PMID: 22095967 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of radiosurgery of bAVMs is complete angiographic obliteration of its nidus. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 1.5T T2-weighted MR imaging and TOF-MRA images for detecting nidus obliteration after radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS The pre- and postradiosurgery MR images and DSA images from 120 patients who were radiosurgically treated for a bAVM were re-evaluated by 2 observers for patency of the nidus (preradiosurgery) and obliteration (postradiosurgery: final follow-up MR imaging), by using a 3-point scale of confidence. Consensus reading of the DSA after radiosurgery was considered the criterion standard for obliteration. Sensitivity, specificity, PPVs, and NPVs, and overall diagnostic performance by using ROC were determined. RESULTS Mean bAVM volume during radiosurgery was 3.4 mL (95% CI, 2.6-4.3 mL). Sixty-six patients (55%) had undergone previous endovascular embolization. The mean intervals between radiosurgery and follow-up MR imaging and for DSA, respectively, were 35.6 months (95% CI, 32.3-38.9 months) and 42.1 months (95% CI, 40.3-44.0 months). With ROC, an area under curve of 0.81-0.83 was found. PPVs of final follow-up MR-imaging for definitive obliteration varied between 0.89 [corrected] and 0.95. NPV was 0.52 [corrected] . An average false-positive rate, meaning overestimation of nidus obliteration of 0.10 [corrected] and an average false-negative rate, meaning underestimation of nidus obliteration of 0.42 [corrected] were found. CONCLUSIONS MRA is insufficient to diagnose obliteration in the follow-up of bAVMs after radiosurgery. A remaining nidus diameter <10 mm seems to be the major limiting factor for reliable assessment of obliteration. We highly recommend follow-up DSA for definitive diagnosis of complete obliteration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D R Buis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wattjes MP, van Oosten BW, de Graaf WL, Seewann A, Bot JCJ, van den Berg R, Uitdehaag BMJ, Polman CH, Barkhof F. No association of abnormal cranial venous drainage with multiple sclerosis: a magnetic resonance venography and flow-quantification study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82:429-35. [PMID: 20980483 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.223479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies using colour-coded Doppler sonography showed that chronic impaired venous drainage from the central nervous system is almost exclusively found in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This study aimed to investigate the intracranial and extracranial venous anatomy and the intracerebral venous flow profile in patients with MS and healthy controls using magnetic resonance venography (MRV). METHODS Twenty patients with definite MS and 20 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were examined. MR imaging was performed on a whole-body 3T MR system including both 3D phase-contrast and dynamic 3D contrast-enhanced MRV as well as flow quantification of the internal cerebral veins and the straight sinus. Image analysis was performed by two experienced interventional neuroradiologists blinded to clinical data and structural brain imaging. The intracranial and extracranial neck veins were analysed for stenosis/occlusion and alternative venous drainage pattern. RESULTS A completely normal venous anatomy was observed in 10 MS patients and 12 controls. Anomalies of the venous system (venous stenosis/occlusions) were found in 10 MS patients and eight healthy controls. An anomalous venous system in combination with associated alternative venous drainage was observed in six MS patients and five healthy controls. Flow quantification showed no venous backflow in any MS patient or control. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggestive of anomalies of the cranial venous outflow anatomy were frequently observed in both MS patients and healthy controls. Given the normal intracranial venous flow quantification results, it is likely that these findings reflect anatomical variants of venous drainage rather than clinically relevant venous outflow obstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike P Wattjes
- MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is a diffuse disease of the central nervous system, and MRI of the spinal cord is highly recommended in the clinical evaluation of patients suspected of having multiple sclerosis. Within the new diagnostic criteria, spinal cord MRI increases sensitivity and possibly specificity for MS, but further work is needed to investigate other criteria that may give greater weight to the presence of cord lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndromes or suspected relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Techniques should be further studied and validated in studies comparing these techniques with clinical status and histopathology, however.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C J Bot
- Department of Radiology, MR Center for MS Research, VU Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gilmore CP, Geurts JJG, Evangelou N, Bot JCJ, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJW, Barkhof F, Bö L. Spinal cord grey matter lesions in multiple sclerosis detected by post-mortem high field MR imaging. Mult Scler 2008; 15:180-8. [PMID: 18845658 DOI: 10.1177/1352458508096876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-mortem studies demonstrate extensive grey matter demyelination in MS, both in the brain and in the spinal cord. However the clinical significance of these plaques is unclear, largely because they are grossly underestimated by MR imaging at conventional field strengths. Indeed post-mortem MR studies suggest the great majority of lesions in the cerebral cortex go undetected, even when performed at high field. Similar studies have not been performed using post-mortem spinal cord material. AIM To assess the sensitivity of high field post-mortem MRI for detecting grey matter lesions in the spinal cord in MS. METHODS Autopsy material was obtained from 11 MS cases and 2 controls. Proton Density-weighted images of this formalin-fixed material were acquired at 4.7 Tesla before the tissue was sectioned and stained for Myelin Basic Protein. Both the tissue sections and the MR images were scored for grey matter and white matter plaques, with the readers of the MR images being blinded to the histopathology results. RESULTS Our results indicate that post-mortem imaging at 4.7 Tesla is highly sensitive for cord lesions, detecting 87% of white matter lesions and 73% of grey matter lesions. The MR changes were highly specific for demyelination, with all lesions scored on MRI corresponding to areas of demyelination. CONCLUSION Our work suggests that spinal cord grey matter lesions may be detected on MRI more readily than GM lesions in the brain, making the cord a promising site to study the functional consequences of grey matter demyelination in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C P Gilmore
- Department of Neurology, Queens Medical Centre NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zwemmer JNP, Bot JCJ, Jelles B, Barkhof F, Polman CH. At the heart of primary progressive multiple sclerosis: three cases with diffuse MRI abnormalities only. Mult Scler 2008; 14:428-30. [PMID: 18208890 DOI: 10.1177/1352458507084591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
We present three patients with a clinical course and cerebrospinal fluid findings consistent with a diagnosis of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Extensive and repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations showed only diffuse abnormality in brain and spinal cord, but no focal lesions. We propose that these cases represent the most pure form of PPMS, even though according to currently applied criteria this diagnosis can not be made in the absence of focal lesions on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J N P Zwemmer
- Department of Neurology, MS Center, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bot JCJ, Blezer ELA, Kamphorst W, Lycklama A Nijeholt GJ, Ader HJ, Castelijns JA, Ig KN, Bergers E, Ravid R, Polman C, Barkhof F. The Spinal Cord in Multiple Sclerosis: Relationship of High-Spatial-Resolution Quantitative MR Imaging Findings to Histopathologic Results. Radiology 2004; 233:531-40. [PMID: 15385682 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2332031572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To correlate quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data (ie, relaxation times and magnetization transfer ratios [MTRs]) with histopathologic findings of demyelination and axonal disease in cervical spinal cord specimens from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and control subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS Formaldehyde-fixed cervical spinal cord specimens from 11 patients with MS-three men and eight women (mean age at death, 66 years +/- 11.3 [standard deviation])-and two female control subjects without neurologic disease (83 and 41 years of age at death) were examined at 4.7 T. Relaxation time measurements and MTR mapping were performed. Analyses included the whole cord area and region-of-interest measurements. Histopathologic analyses included semiquantitative myelin and quantitative axonal analysis. RESULTS Compared with control specimens (P < .001, analysis of variance), specimens from patients with MS had smaller cord areas (mean area, 59.0 mm(2) +/- 12.5 vs 72.7 mm(2) +/- 10.0), significant prolongation of T1 (mean prolongation, 30%) and T2 (mean prolongation, 13%), and decreased MTRs (mean, 10.5%). Within MS specimens, 58% of the white matter area displayed signal intensity abnormalities on intermediate-weighted MR images. The number of axons in normal-appearing white matter in MS specimens was, on average, 46% lower than the number of axons in white matter in control specimens. All quantitative MR parameters correlated well with demyelination; the correlation with T2 relaxation time was the strongest (r = 0.77, Spearman and Kendall nonparametric correlations). By contrast, quantitative MR parameters correlated less well with axonal density; the correlation with T2 relaxation time was the strongest (r = -0.44, Spearman and Kendall nonparametric correlations). Multilevel analysis, corrected for age and MS phenotype, could not result in a model explaining axonal density on the basis of quantitative MR parameters when myelin density was included as a predictor. CONCLUSION Changes in quantitative MR imaging parameters in the cervical spinal cord in MS are mainly determined by demyelination and do not reflect axonal disease well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C J Bot
- Department of Radiology, VU Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bot JCJ, Barkhof F, Polman CH, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, de Groot V, Bergers E, Ader HJ, Castelijns JA. Spinal cord abnormalities in recently diagnosed MS patients: added value of spinal MRI examination. Neurology 2004; 62:226-33. [PMID: 14745058 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.62.2.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The most recent diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) ascertain that findings from spinal cord MRI can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space. Because little is known about the prevalence and characteristics of cord lesions early in the disease, the authors studied the prevalence of spinal cord abnormalities in patients with early-stage MS and assessed their impact on diagnostic classification. METHODS The brains and spinal cords of 104 recently diagnosed patients with MS were examined. Median interval between first symptom and diagnosis was 18.4 months. The brain MRI protocol included before and after gadolinium axial T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences and dual-echo spin-echo images. For spinal cord MRI, sagittal cardiac-triggered dual-echo T2-weighted and sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo images were included. Clinical assessment for each patient included age, sex, clinical signs for spinal cord involvement, and Expanded Disability Status Scale. RESULTS Abnormal cord MRIs were found in 83% of patients, usually with only focal lesions. Diffuse cord abnormalities were found in 13% of patients, although in isolation they were found in only three patients. Focal cord lesions were often multiple (median number, 3.0), small (median, 0.8 vertebral segments), and primarily (56.4%) situated in the cervical spinal cord. In 68 of 104 patients (65.4%), two or more focal lesions were visible on spinal cord images. The criteria for dissemination in space, as defined in the McDonald criteria for the brain, were met in only 66.3% of the patients. This percentage increased to 84.6% when spinal cord MRI abnormalities were also included. CONCLUSION Spinal cord abnormalities are prevalent in patients with early-stage MS, have distinct morphologic characteristics, and help to determine dissemination in space at time of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C J Bot
- MR Center for MS Research, Departments of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bergers E, Bot JCJ, De Groot CJA, Polman CH, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Castelijns JA, van der Valk P, Barkhof F. Axonal damage in the spinal cord of MS patients occurs largely independent of T2 MRI lesions. Neurology 2002; 59:1766-71. [PMID: 12473766 DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000036566.00866.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the degree of axonal damage in relationship to signal abnormalities on T2-weighted high-resolution MRI in spinal cord tissue of patients with MS. METHODS Spinal cord specimens of nine patients with MS and four controls were imaged at high resolution (4.7 T) in an axial plane and scored for lesions with increased signal intensity (SI). Histopathologic sections were cut and immunostained with NE14 (neurofilament marker) and Luxol fast blue (myelin stain). For each area, axonal density and diameter were quantified; axonal irregularity, NE14 axonal staining intensity, and myelin content were semiquantitatively scored. Included were 209 areas from MS cases and 109 areas from control cases distributed over lateral, posterior, and anterior columns. RESULTS In control cases, no SI changes were found, average density of axons was 26,989/mm(2), average diameter was 1.1 micro m, and all scores for axonal irregularity, NE14 staining intensity, and myelin were normal. In MS cases, areas with increased SI were found, average axonal density was 11,807/mm(2) (p < 0.0001), and average axonal diameter 2.0 micro m (p = 0.001). Areas with high SI on MRI had lowest axonal density (average count: 10,504/mm(2); range: 3,433 to 26,325/mm(2)), largest diameter (average: 2.3 micro m; range: 1.0 to 4.0 micro m), and highest axonal irregularity and NE14 staining intensity compared to normal appearing cord tissue (NACT). However, NACT of MS cases also had lower axonal density (14,158/mm(2)) and higher average axonal diameter (1.6 micro m) than controls. CONCLUSIONS Marked axonal loss occurs in MS spinal cords, largely independent of the degree of signal abnormality on T2-weighted MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Bergers
- Dutch MR-MS Center and Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|