A Contemporary Clinico-Anatomical Guide to Craniovertebral Junction Surgery

Background  Surgical treatment of ventral and ventrolateral lesions of the craniocervical junction are among the most challenging neurosurgical pathologies to treat. Three surgical techniques, the far lateral approach (and its variations), the anterolateral approach, and the endoscopic far medial approach can be used to approach and resect lesions in this area. Objective  The aim of the study is to examine the surgical anatomy of three skull base approaches to the craniocervical junction and review surgical cases to better understand the indications and possible complications for each of these approaches. Methods  Cadaveric dissections with standard microsurgical and endoscopic instruments were performed for each of the three surgical approaches, and key steps and surgically relevant anatomy were documented. Six patients with appropriate pre-, post-, and intraoperative imaging and video documentation are presented and discussed accordingly. Results  Based on our institutional experience, all three approaches can be utilized to safely and effectively approach a wide variety of neoplastic and vascular pathology. Unique anatomical characteristics, lesion morphology and size, and tumor biology should all be considered when determining the optimal approach. Conclusion  Preoperative assessment of surgical corridors with 3D illustrations helps to define the best surgical corridor. 360 degree knowledge of the anatomy of craniovertebral junction allows safe surgical approach and treatment of ventral and ventrolateral located lesions using one of the three approaches.

The modified occipital condyle screw: A quantitative anatomic study investigating the feasibility of a novel instrumented fixation technique for craniocervical fusion

Study Design

Prospective human anatomical study.

Objective

Occipitocervical fusion with occipital plate or condyle screws has shown higher failure rates in those with skeletal dysplasia. The modified occipital condyle screw connects the occipital condyle to the pars basilaris of the occipital bone that may achieve fortified bony purchase and serve as a more rigid fixation point. We evaluate anatomical feasibility of a novel cranial fixation technique designed to decrease risk of pseudarthrosis.

Materials and Methods

Occipital condyles were analyzed morphologically using multiplanar three-dimensional reconstructed, ultra-thin section computed tomography. The following parameters were obtained: occipital condyle length, maximal cross section, location of hypoglossal canal, axial and sagittal orientation of the long axis, occipital condyle pedicle (OCP) diameter, maximal length of OCP screw, and entry point.

Results

Forty patients with total of 80 occipital condyles were analyzed and the following measurements were obtained: occipital condyle length 24.1 mm (20.5-27.7, standard deviation [SD]: 2.2); condyle maximum axial cross-section 12.6 mm (9-15.8, SD: 1.9); length of OCP screw 38.9 mm (29.3-44, SD: 5.7); diameter of OCP 3.4 mm (3.2-3.6, SD: 0.2); clearance below hypoglossal canal 4.5 mm (3.4-7, SD: 1.1); and distance of screw entry point from condylar foramen 2 mm (range 0-4, SD 1.6).

Conclusion

The modified occipital condyle screw connects the condyle with the clivus through the pars basilaris and represents a safe and technically feasible approach to achieve craniocervical fusion in skeletally mature individuals. This cephalad anchor point serves as an alternate fixation point of the occipitocervical junction with increased strength of construct and decreased risk of hardware failure or pseudarthrosis given cortical bone purchase and longer screw instrumentation.