Effects of Omeprazole and Verapamil on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Mavacamten: Two Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Healthy Participants

Two open-label, Phase 1 studies assessed the effects of omeprazole (a weak to moderate cytochrome P450 [CYP] 2C19 inhibitor) and verapamil (a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of mavacamten. In the omeprazole study, healthy participants received mavacamten 15 mg alone or with a 31-day course of omeprazole 20 mg once daily. In the verapamil study, healthy participants received mavacamten 25 mg alone or with a 28-day course of verapamil 240 mg once daily. In the omeprazole study, 27 of 29 randomized participants completed the study. Nine participants receiving mavacamten alone were normal metabolizers (NMs) of CYP2C19 substrates, and 6 were rapid metabolizers; 8 NMs and 6 rapid metabolizers received mavacamten + omeprazole. In both studies, mavacamten showed no safety signals and was generally well tolerated. Overall mavacamten exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) increased by approximately 50% with omeprazole coadministration; maximum observed concentration (Cmax ), time to Cmax , and elimination half-life were not affected appreciably. In the verapamil study, 25 of 26 randomized participants received the study drug(s) and were included in the pharmacokinetic analyses; 24 completed the study. In the pharmacokinetic population, 12 participants received mavacamten alone (11 NMs, 1 poor metabolizer) and 13 received mavacamten + verapamil (7 NMs, 4 intermediate metabolizers, 2 poor metabolizers). Following verapamil coadministration in NMs and intermediate metabolizers, mavacamten area under the plasma concentration-time curve was minimally increased (by less than 20%), and Cmax was modestly increased (by 52%). These results suggest that mavacamten can be coadministered with weak CYP2C19 and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors.

A Simulated Application of the Hartford Hospital Aminoglycoside Dosing Nomogram for Plazomicin Dosing Interval Selection in Patients With Serious Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

PURPOSE

In the Phase III Study of Plazomicin Compared With Colistin in Patients With Infection Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CARE), plazomicin was studied for the treatment of critically ill patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Initial plazomicin dosing was guided by creatinine clearance (CrCl) and subsequent doses adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring to achieve AUC_0-24 exposures within a target range (210-315 mg∙h/L). We applied the Hartford nomogram to evaluate whether this clinical tool could reduce plazomicin troughs levels and increase the proportion of patients within the target AUC range.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients enrolled in cohorts 1 or 2 of CARE were eligible for analyses. Observed 10-hour concentrations after the initial dose were plotted on the Hartford nomogram to determine an eligible dosing interval group (q24h, q36h or q48h). On the basis of baseline CrCl, a 15- or 10-mg/kg dose was simulated with the nomogram-recommended dosing interval. The proportion of patients in each dosing interval group with a trough ≥3 mg/L (trough threshold associated with serum creatinine increases ≥0.5 mg/dL in product label) was quantified. Simulated interval-normalized AUC_0-24 was compared with the target AUC range.

FINDINGS

Among the 28 patients with a CrCl ≥60 mL/min, the nomogram recommended every-24-hour dosing in 61% and an extended-interval (q36h or q48h) in 39% of patients. For patients with a CrCl ≥30-59 mL/min (n = 9), the nomogram recommended every-24-hour dosing and an extended-interval in 22% and 78% of patients, respectively. Among both renal function cohorts, exposure simulation with the nomogram significantly reduced the proportion of patients with trough concentrations ≥3 mg/L (CrCl ≥60 mL/min cohort: 91% vs 9%, P < 0.001; CrCl ≥30-59 mL/min cohort, 100% vs 0%, P < 0.001). Relative to the observed mean (SD) AUC_0-24 of 309 mg∙h/mL (96 mg∙h/mL), simulation of extended intervals resulted in a mean interval-normalized AUC_0-24 of 210 mg∙h/mL (40 mg∙h/mL) in all patients eligible for an extended interval, resulting in a similar proportion (49% vs 54%) of patients within the target AUC_0-24 range after the first dose.

IMPLICATIONS

Application of the Hartford nomogram successfully reduced the likelihood of elevated plazomicin trough concentrations while improving AUC exposures in these patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections.

A Phase 1 Study To Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Plazomicin in Adult Subjects with Varying Degrees of Renal Function

Plazomicin is an FDA-approved aminoglycoside for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. In this open-label study, 24 adults with normal renal function or mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment (n = 6 per group) received a single 7.5-mg/kg of body weight dose of plazomicin as a 30-min intravenous infusion. Total clearance declined with renal impairment, resulting in 1.98-fold and 4.42-fold higher plazomicin exposures, as measured by the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity, in subjects with moderate and severe impairment, respectively, than in subjects with normal renal function. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01462136.).

1400. Mass Balance, Metabolism, and Excretion of [14C]-Plazomicin in Healthy Human Subjects

Background

Plazomicin is a next-generation aminoglycoside (AG) with a structure that protects it from common AG resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae, and with in vitro activity against extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the metabolism and excretion of plazomicin in healthy human subjects.

Methods

Six healthy male subjects were administered a single 30-minute intravenous infusion of 15 mg/kg [¹⁴C]-plazomicin (~100 µCi/dose). Following administration, blood (and plasma), urine, and feces were collected for 7 days. Total radioactivity was analyzed by liquid scintillation counting; plazomicin concentration was analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method; and metabolite profiling was conducted by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS).

Results

The majority of the total administered radioactivity was recovered in urine (89.1%), with negligible amounts (<0.2%) excreted in feces. Radioactivity was rapidly eliminated, with ~56% of the total radioactivity recovered in urine within the first 4 hours postdose and >85% recovered in urine by 48 hours postdose. Analysis of nonradiolabeled plazomicin demonstrated that 97.5% of the dose was recovered as unchanged parent drug in urine by the end of the last sampling interval. Metabolite profiling of plasma and urine using AMS showed that [¹⁴C]-plazomicin was the only definable peak present, accounting for 94.3% and 93.6%, respectively, of the total carbon content.

Conclusion

Mass balance was achieved for ¹⁴C-labeled and for nonradiolabeled plazomicin as the majority of the administered dose was recovered in urine, with negligible amounts in the feces. Plazomicin was eliminated as unchanged drug by the kidneys and thus did not appear to be metabolized to any appreciable extent. No metabolites were detected by AMS and plazomicin was the only definable peak present in plasma and urine.

Disclosures

T. Choi, Achaogen, Inc.: Employee, Salary. J. D. Seroogy, Achaogen, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. M. Sanghvi, Xceleron: Employee, Salary. S. V. Dhuria, Achaogen, Inc.: Employee, Salary.

Telavancin and Hydroxy Propyl-β-Cyclodextrin Clearance during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An in vitro Study

Background/Aims

Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent which has been approved in Europe and has been recently FDA approved in the United States. Telavancin's parenteral solution contains hydroxy propyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) to enhance its solubility. The disposition of telavancin and HP-β-CD during continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) has not been previously reported.

Methods

The transmembrane clearances (CLtm) of telavancin and HP-β-CD during continuous hemofiltration and hemodialysis were assessed using an in vitro bovine blood model with AN69 and polysulfone hemodiafilters at varying ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rates (1, 2, 3, & 6 l/hr).

Results

The mean telavancin sieving coefficient ranged from 0.25 to 0.31 during continuous hemofiltration. At all ultrafiltration rates, no differences were observed in telavancin CLtm between the two hemodiafilter types. For continuous hemodialysis, mean telavancin saturation coefficients ranged from 0.10 to 0.43 and CLtm tended to be higher for the polysulfone hemodiafilter than the AN69 hemodiafilter, especially at higher flow rates. Mean HP-β-CD sieving coefficients ranged from 0.63 to 1.03 and saturation coefficients from 0.63 to 1.38, resulting in a CLtm that was similar to ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rates.

Conclusion

Telavancin CLtm is dependent on hemodiafilter type, dialysate and ultrafiltration rates. CRRT with high ultrafiltrate or dialysate rates may result in sufficient telavancin clearance to alter telavancin dosing. HP-β-CD clearance by continuous hemodialysis or continuous hemofiltration is substantial and may be sufficient to prevent HP-β-CD accumulation in subjects receiving CRRT. Pharmacokinetic studies conducted in patients receiving CRRT and telavancin are needed to confirm these in vitro findings.