1
|
Azevedo LA, Canozzi MEA, Rodhermel JCB, Schwegler E, La Manna A, Clariget J, Bianchi I, Moreira F, Olsson DC, Peripolli V. Strategies to alleviate heat stress on performance and physiological parameters in feedlot-finished cattle under heat stress conditions. A systematic review-meta-analysis. J Therm Biol 2024; 119:103798. [PMID: 38310809 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Strategies to alleviate heat stress on live performance - dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed conversion efficiency (FCE) - and on physiological parameters - respiratory rate (RR) and panting score (PS) - of feedlot-finished cattle were evaluated by systematic review-meta-analysis. Using the PICO framework were identified 3813 records, with 31 publications and 6729 cattle being considered in the meta-analysis (MA). The comparison most reported was sun vs. shade (n = 24 publications), followed by shade vs. shade (area per animal and effectivity in reduce solar load) (n = 7 publications) and sun vs. sprinkling (n = 4 publications). Cattle with access to shade with total reduction in solar load improved ADG (p = 0.008) and FCE (p = 0.024), and reduced RR (p < 0.001) compared to unshaded animals. Cattle with access to shade with a height between 3 and 4 m increased ADG (p < 0.001), tended to improve FCE (p = 0.054), and reduced RR (p < 0.001) compared to unshaded animals. An area of shade from 2 to 4 m2/animal increased ADG (p = 0.002), and higher than 4 m2/animal reduced RR (p < 0.001) compared to unshaded animals. Animals that received sprinkling volume below 1 L/animal/min improved ADG (p = 0.008) compared to unshaded animals. Cattle with access to shade with a high area per animal improved DMI (p = 0.023) and ADG (p < 0.001) compared to animals with a low area. In univariate meta-regression, it was observed that the variables significantly (P < 0.05) influencing DMI were THI category; influencing ADG were cattle gender, THI category, and coat color; influencing FCE were cattle age and hemisphere; and influencing RR were country, THI category and climate. Performance and physiological parameters of feedlot-finished cattle under heat stress depend on animal and environmental characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Araujo Azevedo
- Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Araquari, Araquari, SC, 89245-000, Brazil
| | | | | | - Elizabeth Schwegler
- Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Araquari, Araquari, SC, 89245-000, Brazil
| | - Alejandro La Manna
- Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), INIA La Estanzuela, Colonia, 70000, Uruguay
| | - Juan Clariget
- Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), INIA La Estanzuela, Colonia, 70000, Uruguay
| | - Ivan Bianchi
- Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Araquari, Araquari, SC, 89245-000, Brazil
| | - Fabiana Moreira
- Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Araquari, Araquari, SC, 89245-000, Brazil
| | - Débora Cristina Olsson
- Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Concórdia, Concórdia, SC, 89703-720, Brazil
| | - Vanessa Peripolli
- Curso de Pós-Graduação em Produção e Sanidade Animal (PGPSA), Instituto Federal Catarinense, Campus Araquari, Araquari, SC, 89245-000, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|