1
|
Singh RR, Nah SA, Roebuck DJ, Eaton S, Pierro A, Curry JI, Barnacle A, Chippington S, Stuart S, Gibson C, Cross KMK, Stanwell J, Yardley IE, Kiely EM, De Coppi P. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy in children. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1620-1627. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 07/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of this RCT was to determine whether radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) in children is associated with more complications than percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).
Methods
Children at a single tertiary children's hospital requiring a primary gastrostomy were randomized to PEG or RIG. Patients were followed by assessors blinded to the insertion method. Complications were recorded, assigned a severity score, and analysed by zero-inflated Poisson regression analysis on an intention-to-treat basis, adjusting for length of follow-up.
Results
Over a 3-year period, 214 children were randomized (PEG, 107; RIG, 107), of whom 100 received PEG and 96 RIG. There was no significant difference in the number of complications between PEG and RIG groups (P = 0·875), or in the complication score: patients undergoing RIG had a 1·04 (95 per cent c.i. 0·89 to 1·21) times higher complication score than those who underwent PEG (P = 0·597). Only age had an independent significant effect on complication score, with older patients having a 0·97 (0·95 to 1·00) times lower complication score per year.
Conclusion
PEG and RIG are both safe methods of gastrostomy insertion with a low rate of major complications. Registration number: NCT01920438 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R Singh
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - S A Nah
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - D J Roebuck
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - S Eaton
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - A Pierro
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J I Curry
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - A Barnacle
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - S Chippington
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - S Stuart
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - C Gibson
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - K M K Cross
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - J Stanwell
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - I E Yardley
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - E M Kiely
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - P De Coppi
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tullie LGC, Bough GM, Shalaby A, Kiely EM, Curry JI, Pierro A, De Coppi P, Cross KMK. Umbilical hernia following gastroschisis closure: a common event? Pediatr Surg Int 2016; 32:811-4. [PMID: 27344584 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-016-3906-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess incidence and natural history of umbilical hernia following sutured and sutureless gastroschisis closure. METHODS With audit approval, we undertook a retrospective clinical record review of all gastroschisis closures in our institution (2007-2013). Patient demographics, gastroschisis closure method and umbilical hernia occurrence were recorded. Data, presented as median (range), underwent appropriate statistical analysis. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were identified, gestation 36 weeks (31-38), birth weight 2.39 kg (1-3.52) and 23 (43 %) were male. Fourteen patients (26 %) underwent sutureless closure: 12 primary, 2 staged; and 39 (74 %) sutured closure: 19 primary, 20 staged. Sutured closure was interrupted sutures in 24 patients, 11 pursestring and 4 not specified. Fifty patients were followed-up over 53 months (10-101) and 22 (44 %) developed umbilical hernias. There was a significantly greater hernia incidence following sutureless closure (p = 0.0002). In sutured closure, pursestring technique had the highest hernia rate (64 %). Seven patients underwent operative hernia closure; three secondary to another procedure. Seven patients had their hernias resolve. One patient was lost to follow-up and seven remain under observation with no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant umbilical hernia incidence following sutureless and pursestring sutured gastroschisis closure. This has not led to complications and the majority have not undergone repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L G C Tullie
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - G M Bough
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - A Shalaby
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - E M Kiely
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - J I Curry
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - A Pierro
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.,Division of General Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Canada
| | - P De Coppi
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.,Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, DBC, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - K M K Cross
- Department of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|