Assessing the probability of drug-induced QTc-interval prolongation during clinical drug development

Early in the course of clinical development of new non-antiarrhythmic drugs, it is important to assess the propensity of these drugs to prolong the QT/QTc-interval. The current regulatory guidelines suggest using the largest time-matched mean difference between drug and placebo (baseline-adjusted) groups over the sampling interval, thereby neglecting any potential exposure-effect relationship and nonlinearity in the underlying physiological fluctuation in QT values. Thus far, most of the attempted models for characterizing drug-induced QTc-interval prolongation have disregarded the possibility of model parameterization in terms of drug-specific and system-specific properties. Using a database consisting of three compounds with known dromotropic activity, we built a bayesian hierarchical pharmacodynamic (PD) model to describe QT interval, encompassing an individual correction factor for heart rate, an oscillatory component describing the circadian variation, and a truncated maximum-effect model to account for drug effect. The explicit description of the exposure-effect relationship, incorporating various sources of variability, offers advantages over the standard regulatory approach.

Are we optimizing gestational diabetes treatment with glyburide? The pharmacologic basis for better clinical practice

Glyburide's pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics have not been studied in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The objective of this study was to assess steady-state PK of glyburide, as well as insulin sensitivity, beta-cell responsivity, and overall disposition indices after a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) in women with GDM (n = 40), nonpregnant women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (n = 26), and healthy pregnant women (n = 40, MMTT only). At equivalent doses, glyburide plasma concentrations were approximately 50% lower in pregnant women than in nonpregnant subjects. The average umbilical cord/maternal plasma glyburide concentration ratio at the time of delivery was 0.7 +/- 0.4. Insulin sensitivity was approximately fivefold lower in women with GDM as compared with healthy pregnant women. Despite comparable beta-cell responsivity indices, the average beta-cell function corrected for insulin resistance was more than 3.5-fold lower in women with glyburide-treated GDM than in healthy pregnant women. Women with GDM in whom glyburide treatment has failed may benefit from alternative medication or dosage escalation; however, fetal safety should be kept in mind.