Chronic immunosuppressant use in colorectal cancer patients worsens postoperative morbidity and mortality through septic complications in a propensity-matched analysis

AIM

Chronic immunosuppressant use increases the risk of septic complications after colectomy; however, adverse effects on other organ systems remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the multisystem organ effect(s) of chronic immunosuppressant(s) in colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database (2005-2012) was queried. The primary end-points were 30-day mortality and 30-day morbidity after colectomy in patients on chronic immunosuppressant(s) compared to a non-immunosuppressant cohort.

RESULTS

In total, 50 766 patients were identified, with 1203 (2.4%) taking chronic immunosuppressant(s). After propensity matching, 1197 patients in each cohort were evaluated with no differences seen in age, body mass index, male sex, wound classification, emergency case status, the presence of preoperative sepsis or operative time. On outcome analysis, 30-day mortality (5.7% vs 3.4%, P < 0.001) and 30-day overall morbidity (35.4% vs 29.0%, P = 0.001) were higher in patients on chronic immunosuppressant(s). Septic complications (10.6% vs 7.9%, P = 0.02) and surgical site infections (15.3% vs 12.3%, P = 0.03) were elevated with chronic immunosuppressant(s). There were no differences in cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal or neurological complications. Chronic immunosuppressant patients demonstrated longer total hospital stay (11.4 ± 11.7 vs 9.5 ± 9.4 days, P < 0.001) and postoperative length of stay (9.4 ± 9.2 vs 8.1 ± 7.6 days, P < 0.001). The limitation was that this was a retrospective study using a clinical dataset.

CONCLUSION

In this study, immunosuppressant use is associated with worsened infective complications, without contributing to organ-specific complications following colectomy. Significant thought should be given to anastomosis vs stoma creation to possibly prevent worsened morbidity and mortality. Future study is required to determine specific pathways for risk reduction.

Perforated diverticulitis in the setting of ulcerative colitis: An unusual case report

INTRODUCTION

The association of diverticulitis with ulcerative colitis (UC) is rare and not well described. The sequelae of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) such as perforation and fistula formation can mimic diverticular complications. Therefore, in an IBD patient, it can be difficult to distinguish the etiology of such complications and render definitive care.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 43-year-old man with a long history of UC presented with spontaneous sigmoid perforation and subsequent complications of colovesicular and colocutaneous fistulae requiring multiple procedural interventions. Ultimately, the etiology was confirmed as perforated diverticulitis superimposed on severe ulcerative colitis.

DISCUSSION

As perforated diverticulitis superimposed on UC is a rare entity in the current literature and there are many diagnostic difficulties that complicate this scenario. It is important to rule out other entities such as misdiagnosis of IBD or segmental colitis associated with diverticula (SCAD) that may have overlapping features.

CONCLUSION

Although diverticulitis in the setting of UC is an uncommon presentation, it remains important for medical practitioners to consider this scenario when encountering patients who may present in a similar fashion. As such, we put forth a process to aid in a diagnosis and management such that definitive care may not be delayed.