Christmas NJ, Van Quill K, Murray TG, Gordon CD, Garonzik S, Tse D, Johnson T, Schiffman J, O'Brien JM. Evaluation of efficacy and complications: primary pediatric orbital implants after enucleation.
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;
118:503-6. [PMID:
10766136 DOI:
10.1001/archopht.118.4.503]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Orbital implants are used routinely in pediatric patients at the time of enucleation. Complications, such as exposure, ptosis, and infection, may occur after implantation. Controversy continues regarding the rate of complications with newer implants in the pediatric population.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the effects of orbital implants on children whose eyes have been enucleated.
METHODS
Records of orbital implantation after enucleation performed by 5 surgeons on 120 pediatric patients (123 eyes) over a 10.5-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, ocular diagnosis, prior ophthalmic surgery, implant characteristics, and postoperative complications were described using a standardized format for all patients, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up (mean, 3 years).
RESULTS
Complications were observed in 7 eyes (5.7%). Implant exposure (1 [0.8%]), implant extrusion (0 [0%), and implant migration (3 [2.4%) were rare. One hundred eighteen eyes (96%) had good cosmesis and 120 (98%) had good motility.
CONCLUSIONS
Orbital implantation after enucleation is successful in the pediatric population. Complications are minimal. Hydroxyapatite implants were not associated with unacceptable complications in this pediatric population.
Collapse