Evaluation of quality of life and function at 1 year after transanal endoscopic microsurgery

AIM

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) enables organ preservation after rectal tumour surgery. Its application is being expanded using adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments. Our objective was to evaluate the changes over time in anorectal function, urinary symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients who had TEM surgery for a rectal tumour.

METHOD

Between September 2009 and October 2012, a consecutive series of 102 patients underwent TEM at a single institution. Patients were asked to fill out standardized questionnaires at baseline and then at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after surgery. The QoL among these patients was assessed using one generic (EQ-5D) and two disease-specific [European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29] questionnaires. Anorectal and urinary symptoms were studied using the COlo-REctal Functional Outcome (COREFO) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) questionnaires, respectively.

RESULTS

The response rate was 90% (92/102 patients). Postoperative complications occurred in 14% (13/92) of patients. The general QoL (as assessed using the EQ-5D) was lower 6 and 12 weeks after TEM compared with baseline QoL (P < 0.05) but returned towards baseline after 26 weeks. Anorectal function (determined using the COREFO) was worse 6 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01) but had normalized by 12 weeks. Urinary function (determined using the I-PSS) was not affected at any time point after surgery. The total COREFO score and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were correlated with the deterioration in QoL.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that TEM has a temporary and reversible impact on QoL and anorectal function. Intensive interrogation of QoL and function using appropriate questionnaires will help to define the role of organ-preserving surgery for rectal cancer before and after chemoradiotherapy.

Virtual reality training for endoscopic surgery: voluntary or obligatory?

Introduction

Virtual reality (VR) simulators have been developed to train basic endoscopic surgical skills outside of the operating room. An important issue is how to create optimal conditions for integration of these types of simulators into the surgical training curriculum. The willingness of surgical residents to train these skills on a voluntary basis was surveyed.

Methods

Twenty-one surgical residents were given unrestricted access to a VR simulator for a period of four months. After this period, a competitive element was introduced to enhance individual training time spent on the simulator. The overall end-scores for individual residents were announced periodically to the full surgical department, and the winner was awarded a prize.

Results

In the first four months of study, only two of the 21 residents (10%) trained on the simulator, for a total time span of 163 minutes. After introducing the competitive element the number of trainees increased to seven residents (33%). The amount of training time spent on the simulator increased to 738 minutes.

Conclusions

Free unlimited access to a VR simulator for training basic endoscopic skills, without any form of obligation or assessment, did not motivate surgical residents to use the simulator. Introducing a competitive element for enhancing training time had only a marginal effect. The acquisition of expensive devices to train basic psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery is probably only effective when it is an integrated and mandatory part of the surgical curriculum.

Construct validity of the LapSim: Can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality simulators may be invaluable in training and assessing future endoscopic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the results of a training session reflect the actual skill of the trainee who is being assessed and thereby establish construct validity for the LapSim virtual reality simulator (Surgical Science Ltd., Gothenburg, Sweden).

METHODS

Forty-eight subjects were assigned to one of three groups: 16 novices (0 endoscopic procedures), 16 surgical residents in training (>10 but <100 endoscopic procedures), and 16 experienced endoscopic surgeons (>100 endoscopic procedures). Performance was measured by a relative scoring system that combines single parameters measured by the computer.

RESULTS

The higher the level of endoscopic experience of a participant, the higher the score. Experienced surgeons and surgical residents in training showed statistically significant higher scores than novices for both overall score and efficiency, speed, and precision parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that performance of the various tasks on the simulator corresponds to the respective level of endoscopic experience in our research population. This study demonstrates construct validity for the LapSim virtual reality simulator. It thus measures relevant skills and can be integrated in an endoscopic training and assessment program.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic stenting is the treatment of choice for palliative relief of biliary obstruction by a periampullary tumor. If treated surgically, a choledochojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y diversion is still performed by laparotomy in a large number of cases due to technical challenges of the biliodigestive anastomosis in the laparoscopic approach. Robotic systems may enhance dexterity and vision and might therefore support surgeons in delicate laparoscopic interventions. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of performing a laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction with the aid of a robotic system.

METHODS

Ten laparoscopic procedures were performed in pigs with the da Vinci robotic system and compared to 10 procedures performed by laparotomy (controls). Operation room time, anastomoses time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The effectiveness of the anastomoses was evaluated by postoperative observation for 14 days and by measuring passage, circumference, and number of stitches.

RESULTS

Operating room time was significantly longer for the robot-assisted group than for controls (140 vs 82 min, p < 0.05). The anastomoses times were longer in the robot-assisted cases but not statistically significant (biliodigestive anastomosis, 29 vs 20 min; intestinal anastomosis, 30 vs 15 min), Blood loss was less than 10 cc in all robot-assisted cases and 30 cc (10-50 cc) in the controls. In both groups, there were no intraoperative complications. In the control group, one pig died of gastroparesis on postoperative day 6. In the robot-assisted group, one pig died on postoperative day 7 due to a volvulus of the jejunum. At autopsy, a bilioma was found in one pig in the robot-assisted group. In all pigs, the biliodigestive and intestinal anastomoses were macroscopically patent with an adequate passage. Circumference and number of stitches were similar.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy was proven in this study. The procedure can be performed within an acceptable time frame.