4
|
von Mehren M, Chu Q, Alcindor T, Townsley C, Thallury S, MacAlpine K, Wright JJ, Oza A. Early results of a PMH Phase II Consortium trial of AZD0530 in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.10579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10579 Background: AZD0530 is a novel oral anilino quinazoline that is selective for c-Src, c-Yes, Lck, and Bcr-Abl through ATP competitive and reversible inhibition of the target enzyme. Src kinases play a role in tumor cell migration, invasion and metastasis as well as being part of the signaling cascade for angiogenesis and growth factors. Advanced STS have limited therapeutic options; therefore we tested the efficacy of AZD0530 in advanced STS. Methods: The study utilized a Simon Two stage design with the primary endpoint be objective tumor response + prolonged stable disease rate (defined as partial/complete response by RECIST, or stable disease >4 months). Patients with measurable advanced STS with up to one prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were eligible for study participation following informed consent. Patients were excluded for cardiac dysfunction, poorly controlled hypertension, inability to swallow or absorb medication. Patients had pulmonary function tests at baseline that were repeated within the first 4 weeks of therapy. Results: 17 patients (11 F, 6M) with advanced STS (leiomyosarcoma 5, rhabdomyosarcoma 3, MFH/carcinosarcoma/Fibrosarcoma 2, endometrial stromal sarcoma/liposarcoma/non-rhabdoSTS 1 each) were enrolled, the majority of whom had prior therapy (14 chemo and 9 xrt). Five continue on study. Nine discontinued therapy for progressive disease, 2 for toxicity and 1 patient request. Median time to progression in the 13 patients was 1.7 months. Possibly related severe adverse events (all grade 3) included fatigue (2), anemia/lymphopenia/hypokalemia (1 each). To date no confirmed responses have been seen. No drug related pulmonary toxicity has been observed. Conclusions: AZD0530 can be administered safely as a single agent in patients with a variety of advanced STS. To date, tumor responses have not been noted; however patients were not selected based on tumor target expression. Further testing may be warranted in selected tumors in combination with chemotherapy given pre-clinical synergy data or in tumors pre-selected for target expression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. von Mehren
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Q. Chu
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - T. Alcindor
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - C. Townsley
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - S. Thallury
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - K. MacAlpine
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - J. J. Wright
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - A. Oza
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, AB, Canada; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; IDBCTEP National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elser C, Hirte H, Kaizer L, Mackay H, Bindra S, Tinker L, MacAlpine K, Wang L, Sidor C, Oza A. Phase II study of MKC-1 in patients with metastatic or resistant epithelial ovarian cancer or advanced endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.5577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5577 Background: MKC-1 is a novel oral cell cycle inhibitor with preclinical activity in xenograft models of human ovarian and endometrial cancers. MKC-1 also reduces pAKT, an attractive target in endometrial cancer due to frequent PTEN mutations. Methods: The objective of this phase II study is to assess the efficacy of MKC-1 in 2 patient (pt) populations: metastatic or recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (EOC) and advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Three prior lines of treatment were allowed in both groups. A two arm, parallel group multicenter 2-stage design was used. The primary endpoint was tumor response by RECIST or CA-125. MKC-1 125 mg/m2 was administered orally twice daily for 14 days in 28-day cycles. Results: Accrual to stage one is complete with 21 pts in each arm. 19 pts with EOC (median age 56 yrs, range 31–71) and 9 patients with EC (median 63 range 50–74) were available for efficacy. A total of 66 cycles (EOC/EC: 39/27cycles) median 2 per patient (range 1–8) were delivered. 11/4 pts had prior adjuvant CT, 14/10 had prior systemic CT for advanced disease, and 2/6 received prior radiation. In pts with EOC, 7 pts have stable disease (SD), 12 progressive disease (PD), 2 remain on study. Median time to progression is 1.8 months. In pts with EC 4 pts had SD, 5 PD, 6 remain on study. Toxicity data are available in 28 pts (17/11). Most common adverse events (AE) possibly related to MKC-1 were fatigue, nausea, elevated ALT or AST, urine discoloration, anemia, anorexia, elevated AP and gastrointestinal disorder in 55%, 39%, 36%, 24%, 23%, 21%, 21%, and 21 % of cycles respectively. The only possibly related grade 3+ AEs were neutropenia, leucopenia and hyponatremia in 9 %, 3 %, and 2% of cycles. Conclusions: MKC-1 was well tolerated in both patient populations. Single agent MKC-1 has insufficient activity in platinum resistant EOC to warrant further investigation. Updated clinical data for both patient groups will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Elser
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - H. Hirte
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - L. Kaizer
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - H. Mackay
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - S. Bindra
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - L. Tinker
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - K. MacAlpine
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - L. Wang
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - C. Sidor
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - A. Oza
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada; EntreMed, Inc., Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brandwein JM, Leber BF, Howson-Jan K, Schimmer AD, Schuh AC, Gupta V, Yee KWL, Wright J, Moore M, MacAlpine K, Minden MD. A phase I study of tipifarnib combined with conventional induction and consolidation therapy for previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia aged 60 years and over. Leukemia 2008; 23:631-4. [PMID: 19092853 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Patients aged 60 years and over with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia were enrolled in a Phase I study combining tipifarnib with standard induction therapy. The regimen consisted of cytarabine 100 mg/m(2)/day continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1-7, daunorubicin 60 mg/m(2)/day i.v. push x 3 on days 6-8 and tipifarnib twice daily on days 6-15. Tipifarnib was escalated over four dose levels (200, 300, 400 and 600 mg). Patients achieving complete response (CR) were eligible to receive one consolidation using the same regimen. The following dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were identified during induction: dose level I: 2/6 (hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory arrest), level II: 0/3, level III: 0/3 and level IV: 4/10 (one each of diarrhea, neutropenic enterocolitis, arrhythmia and delayed hematologic recovery post-consolidation). There were no DLTs due to delayed hematologic recovery post-induction. Of 22 evaluable patients, there were 10 CR, 2 morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), 2 partial remission (PR) and 8 non-responders. Of seven patients with adverse risk cytogenetics, there were four CR/MLFS and one PR. In summary, this regimen was well tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, although somewhat more severe gastrointestinal toxicity was seen at dose level IV. Tipifarnib 600 mg b.i.d. is considered the recommended dose for further study using this regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Brandwein
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|