1
|
Śniadecki M, Guani B, Jaworek P, Klasa-Mazurkiewicz D, Mahiou K, Mosakowska K, Buda A, Poniewierza P, Piątek O, Crestani A, Stasiak M, Balaya V, Musielak O, Piłat L, Maliszewska K, Aristei C, Guzik P, Wojtylak S, Liro M, Gaillard T, Kocian R, Gołąbiewska A, Chmielewska Z, Wydra D. Tertiary prevention strategies for micrometastatic lymph node cervical cancer: A systematic review and a prototype of an adapted model of care. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 197:104329. [PMID: 38527594 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We found a need for balancing the application of clinical guidelines and tailored approaches to follow-up of cervical cancer (CC) patients in the lymph node micrometastatic (MICs) setting. This review aimed to determine the current knowledge of management of MIC-positive CC cases. METHODOLOGY We addressed prognostic and risk of recurrence monitoring impacts associated with MIC+ cases. The electronic databases for literature and relevant articles were analysed. RESULTS Fifteen studies, (4882 patients), were included in our systematic review. While the results show that MICs significantly worsen prognosis in early CC. A tertiary prevention algorithm for low volume lymph node disease may stratify follow-up according to the burden of nodal disease and provide data that helps improve follow-up performance. CONCLUSION MICs worsen prognosis and should be managed as suggested by the algorithm. However, this algorithm must be externally validated. The clinical impact of isolated tumor cells (ITC) remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Śniadecki
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - Benedetta Guani
- Hospital of Fribourg HFR, Chemin des Pensionnats 2/6, Villars-sur-Glâne 1752, Switzerland
| | - Paulina Jaworek
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Katia Mahiou
- Breast, Gynaecology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - Karolina Mosakowska
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, Verduno, Italy
| | | | - Olga Piątek
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Adrien Crestani
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Hospital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Maria Stasiak
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Vincent Balaya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Félix Guyon Hospital, CHU La Réunion, La Reunion Island, France
| | - Oliwia Musielak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Transplant and General Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Luiza Piłat
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Karolina Maliszewska
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paweł Guzik
- Clinical Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, City Hospital Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Szymon Wojtylak
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Marcin Liro
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Thomas Gaillard
- Department of Surgery, Institute Curie, University Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Roman Kocian
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Gołąbiewska
- Department of Environmental Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Zuzanna Chmielewska
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Dariusz Wydra
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maliszewska K, Świątkowska-Freund M, Bidzan M, Preis K. Relationship, social support, and personality as psychosocial determinants of the risk for postpartum blues. Ginekol Pol 2018; 87:442-7. [PMID: 27418222 DOI: 10.5603/gp.2016.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of the study was to identify factors increasing or decreasing the risk for postpartum blues. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 101 women in their first week postpartum were included in the study. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, questions concerning their medical and social status, and psychological tests (the Personality Inventory NEO-FFI, The Mieczysław Plopa and Jan Rostowski Marriage Questionnaire, and the Berlin Social Support Scales) were used. RESULTS The probability of postpartum blues was detected in 16.8% of the respondents. The risk decreased with higher satisfaction with intimacy (OR = 0.81), partner similarity (OR = 0.78), and the overall satisfaction with the relationship (OR = 0.94), while higher disappointment elevated that risk (OR = 1.12). As far as social support is concerned, further inde-pendent factors included perceived available social support (OR = 0.31), perceived instrumental social support (OR = 0.24), need for support (OR = 2.74), and protective buffering support (OR = 3.41). High level of neuroticism as well as fear of childbirth increased the risk for postpartum blues (OR = 2.17 and OR = 1.30, respectively). High level of extraversion and better quality of sleep constituted protective factors (OR = 0.74 and OR = 0.60, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Maternal disappointment with marriage/relationship, neuroticism and introversion, poor quality of sleep, fear of childbirth, and seeking social support are among the factors signaling the need for careful observation for signs of possible postpartum mood disorders both, during hospitalization and the follow-up visits.
Collapse
|
3
|
Maliszewska K, Bidzan M, Świątkowska-Freund M, Preis K. Personality type, social support and other correlates of risk for affective disorders in early puerperium. Ginekol Pol 2018; 87:814-819. [PMID: 28098932 DOI: 10.5603/gp.2016.0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2016] [Revised: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of risk for postpartum mood disorders in mothers during the early postnatal period and to search for coexisting conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS We studied 546 women in the first week after delivery. The subjects filled out a questionnaire concerning their health, social and demographic status, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire, the NEO-FFI Personality Inventory and the Berlin Social Support Scales. RESULTS Probable mood disorders affected 15.85% of these patients. The risk increased with a current cesarean section (ORa = 2.54), a higher level of neuroticism (ORa = 1.65), greater fear of childbirth (ORa = 1.18), a lower level of extraversion (ORa = 0.77) and greater need for social support (ORa = 2.68). CONCLUSIONS High level of neuroticism and introversion, as well as higher fear of delivery and the need of social support are among factors increasing the probability of mood disturbances in early postpartum period. A cesarean section might elevate the risk similarly. The mental health of such patients should be carefully examined.
Collapse
|
4
|
Maliszewska K, Świątkowska-Freund M, Bidzan M, Krzysztof P. Screening for maternal postpartum depression and associationswith personality traits and social support. A Polish follow-upstudy 4 weeks and 3 months after delivery. Psychiatr Pol 2017; 51:889-898. [PMID: 29289968 DOI: 10.12740/pp/68628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the likelihood of postpartum depression and to explore maternal characteristics in terms of personality, social support and other medical and psychological data. METHODS A sample of 548 patients was investigated 4 weeks and 3 months after delivery. They responded to questionnaires containing sociodemographic questions: the EPDS (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), the PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), theNEO-FFI (Personality Inventory), and the BSSS (Berlin Social Support Scales). RESULTS Probable depression any time during first 3 months postpartum was prevalent among 6.38% of women, based on the following criteria: EPDS > 12 points and PHQ-9 > 9 points. A score of EPDS > 9 in the first week after delivery (ORa = 4.16; CI 1.59-10.86), a history of hospitalisation during pregnancy (ORa = 3.51; CI 1.32-9.20), a high level of neuroticism (ORa = 1.37; CI 1.05-1.77), and high buffering-protective social support (ORa =2.56; 1.25-5.23) were significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Potential protective factors were initial breastfeeding (ORa = 0.31; CI 0.11-0.90) and high satisfaction with currently received social support (ORa=0.41;CI 0.22-0.79). The total dropout rate was 23%. CONCLUSIONS New mothers who are neurotic and who suffered from physical or mental problems during pregnancy and puerperium might experience depressive symptoms more easily. They would also protect those close to them from negative information about themselves. A lack of initial breastfeeding and unsatisfactory social support played a similar role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Preis Krzysztof
- Klinika Położnictwa, Katedra Perinatologii, Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adamska E, Kretowski A, Goscik J, Citko A, Bauer W, Waszczeniuk M, Maliszewska K, Paczkowska-Abdulsalam M, Niemira M, Szczerbinski L, Ciborowski M, Gorska M. The type 2 diabetes susceptibility TCF7L2 gene variants affect postprandial glucose and fat utilization in non-diabetic subjects. Diabetes Metab 2017; 44:379-382. [PMID: 28579156 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E Adamska
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
| | - A Kretowski
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland; Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - J Goscik
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - A Citko
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - W Bauer
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - M Waszczeniuk
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland; Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - K Maliszewska
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - M Paczkowska-Abdulsalam
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - M Niemira
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - L Szczerbinski
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - M Ciborowski
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - M Gorska
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, M.C. Sklodowskiej 24A, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| |
Collapse
|