A prospective, randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled comparative study of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30,6086 with digestive enzymes in improving indigestion in geriatric population

INTRODUCTION

Digestive symptoms are common affecting more than 60% of the elderly people. Digestive enzyme deficiency and dysbiosis in the gastric fluid microbiota are the major contributors in the pathophysiology of indigestion. Therefore, therapeutic strategy targeting the gastric microbiota and digestive enzymes has the potential to treat indigestion. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of probiotic Bacillus coagulans GBI30,6086 along with digestive enzymes in improving indigestion in geriatric population.

METHODS

An open-labelled, randomized, prospective study was conducted in geriatric patients with complaints of indigestion. The study group (n = 25) received 5 ml of reconstituted probiotic syrup containing Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086, and digestive enzymes daily and the control group (n = 25) received 5 ml of placebo syrup twice daily for 5 days and followed-up after 7 days.

RESULTS

Reduction in Modified Glasgow dyspepsia severity score from baseline to follow up was statistically significant in the study group when compared to the control group (P < 0.0001). Improvement in indigestion, abdominal pain, and flatulence was also greater in the study group compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Bacillus coagulans along with digestive enzymes are effective in treating indigestion in geriatric patients. It is well tolerated and safe to be used in geriatric patients without any major adverse effects.

Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 as an add-on therapy for irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

The symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) lead to considerable impairment of health-related quality of life and high health care costs. Available therapies are not efficient in treating the symptoms of IBS. Studies have shown the beneficial effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856. Therefore, this study was done to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S. cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 in the treatment of IBS.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. One hundred newly diagnosed subjects with IBS were subgrouped into IBS-D, IBS-C, and IBS-M and then randomized to the S. cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 and placebo groups. Saccharomyces cerevisiae/placebo was administered in addition to standard treatment for a period of 8 weeks. Subjects were assessed for improvement of abdominal pain and change in stool consistency using a 7-point Likert scale and Bristol stool scale respectively.

RESULTS

The mean reduction of abdominal pain score in the S. cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 group was statistically significant when compared with the placebo group (p < 0.001). Similar improvement was also seen in the subgroups. Improvement in stool consistency in IBS-D subgroup at the end of treatment period was found to be statistically significant in S. cerevisiae group when compared to that of placebo (p < 0.001). A similar improvement was seen in the IBS-C and IBS-M subgroups. No serious adverse events were recorded in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 in IBS at a dose of 2 billion CFU twice daily for 8 weeks has shown to have an improvement in abdominal pain and stool consistency due to its analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity in subjects with IBS.

Supportive therapy for dysmenorrhea: Time to look beyond mefenamic acid in primary care

Dysmenorrhea is a recurrent and chronic primary health care issue. Mefenamic acid and NSAID based therapy regimens have unwanted side effects on its long-term usage. NSAIDs reduce pain, albeit they do not address the enhanced pain sensitivity and other neuronal symptoms of dysmenorrhea. Hence, there is a need for supportive therapy which can target both pelvic pain and the neuronal symptoms. Historically, European medicinal plants and their extracts such as, valeriana officinalis, humulus lupulus, and passiflora incarnata have been used in menstrual disorders for centuries. The current review is focused on the available evidence for its use as monotherapy or as supportive therapy in combination with other conventional medications.

A comparative study of synbiotic as an add-on therapy to standard treatment in patients with aggressive periodontitis

Context:

The role of synbiotic in the management of aggressive periodontitis (AP) is not well established.

Aim:

We designed this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of synbiotic as an add-on therapy in the management of AP.

Settings and Design:

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty patients with AP were randomized to two groups of 30 each. Study group received standard treatment, i.e., scaling and root planing along with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for the 1^st day (loading dose) followed by 100 mg once daily for 1 week and synbiotic lozenge twice daily for 8 weeks, whereas control group received standard treatment for 1 week and placebo lozenge for 8 weeks. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 4^th, 8^th, and 12^th weeks.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Pearson's Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance were used to analyze distribution of sex and age, respectively. Differences within the groups were analyzed by Student's paired t-test. Pearson's Chi-square test was applied to measure gingival bleeding index.

Results:

On comparison at 12 weeks, there was a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.01) in probing depth, clinical attachment loss, oral hygiene index, and bleeding on probing in study group. No Adverse drug reactions were noted.

Conclusion:

Co-administration of synbiotic lozenge along with standard therapy is highly efficacious in improving periodontal health in patients with AP.