Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with distal medium vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Endovascular therapy (EVT) for distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) is a potential frontier of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment, but its efficacy against best medical therapy (BMT) remains unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of EVT versus BMT in primary DMVO.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase, from inception to August 14, 2022, for studies comparing EVT with BMT in DMVO-AIS. We adopted the Distal Thrombectomy Summit Group's definition of DMVO. Efficacy outcomes were functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) and excellent functional outcomes (90-day mRS 0-1). Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Fourteen observational and two randomized-controlled studies were included, with 1202 patients receiving EVT and 1267 receiving BMT. After trim-and-fill correction, EVT achieved significantly better odds of functional independence than BMT (adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.43). There were no significant differences in overall excellent functional outcomes (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.71), sICH (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.66), and mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.45). Stratified by EVT method, mechanical thrombectomy±intra-arterial thrombolysis achieved more excellent functional outcomes than BMT (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.23). In mild strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <6), EVT caused significantly more sICH (OR 6.30, 95% CI 1.55 to 25.64).

CONCLUSIONS

EVT shows promising efficacy benefit over BMT for primary DMVO-AIS. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EVT in DMVO-AIS.

Distal medium vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke - Stent retriever versus direct aspiration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute ischaemic stroke due to distal medium vessel occlusion (AIS-DMVO) causes significant morbidity. Endovascular thrombectomy advancement has made treating AIS-DMVO with stent retrievers (SR) and aspiration catheters (AC) possible, however the optimal technique remains unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of SR use compared to purely AC use in patients with AIS-DMVO.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE, from inception to 2nd September 2022, for studies comparing SR or primary combined (SR/PC) against AC in AIS-DMVO. We adopted the Distal Thrombectomy Summit Group's definition of DMVO. Efficacy outcomes were functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days), first pass effect (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (mTICI) 2c-3 or expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI) 2c-3 at first pass), successful final recanalisation (mTICI or eTICI 2b-3), and excellent final recanalisation (mTICI or eTICI 2c-3). Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

12 cohort studies and 1 randomised-controlled trial were included, involving 1881 patients with 1274 receiving SR/PC and 607 receiving AC only. SR/PC achieved higher odds of functional independence (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.67) and lower odds of mortality (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.94) than AC. Odds of successful/excellent recanalisation and sICH were similar between both groups. Stratified to compare only SR and only AC, the use of only SR, achieved significantly higher odds of successful recanalisation as compared to only AC (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.17-2.78).

CONCLUSION

There is potential for efficacy and safety benefits in SR/PC use as compared to AC only in AIS-DMVO. Further trials are necessary to validate the efficacy and safety of SR use in AIS-DMVO.

Potential Embolic Sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale

INTRODUCTION

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) may coexist with other potential embolic sources (PESs) in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), leading to difficulty in attributing the stroke to either the PFO or other PESs. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictors of concomitant PESs in ESUS patients with PFOs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary stroke centre. Consecutive patients with ESUS and a concomitant PFO admitted between 2012 and 2021 were included in the study. Baseline characteristics and investigations as a part of stroke workup including echocardiographic and neuroimaging data were collected. PESs were adjudicated by 2 independent neurologists after reviewing the relevant workup.

RESULTS

Out of 1,487 ESUS patients, a total of 309 patients who had a concomitant PFO with mean age of 48.8 ± 13.2 years were identified during the study period. The median Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score for the study cohort was 6 (IQR 5-7.5). Of the 309 patients, 154 (49.8%) only had PFO, 105 (34.0%) patients had 1 other PES, 34 (11.0%) had 2 PES, and 16 (5.2%) had 3 or more PES. The most common PESs were atrial cardiopathy (23.9%), left ventricular dysfunction (22.0%), and cardiac valve disease (12.9%). The presence of additional PESs was associated with age ≥60 years (p < 0.001), RoPE score ≤6 (p ≤0.001), and the presence of comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (p = 0.004), hypertension (p≤ 0.001), and ischaemic heart disease (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of ESUS patients with PFOs had concomitant PESs. The presence of concomitant PESs was associated with older age and a lower RoPE score. Further, large cohort studies are warranted to investigate the significance of the PES and their overlap with PFOs in ESUS.