Maximizing ovarian function and fertility following chemotherapy in premenopausal patients: Is there a role for ovarian suppression?

As more premenopausal patients undergo fertility preserving cancer treatments, there is an increased need for fertility counseling and ovarian sparing strategies. Many patients receive gonadotoxic chemotherapeutic agents which can put them at risk of primary ovarian insufficiency or profoundly diminished ovarian reserve. Traditionally, estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) values have been used to evaluate ovarian function but more recently, reproductive endocrinologists have been proponents of anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) as a validated measure of ovarian potential. While the gold standard for fertility preservation remains oocyte cryopreservation, data suggest there may be additional interventions that can mitigate the gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents. The main objectives of this focused review were to quantify the risk of primary ovarian failure associated with the most common chemotherapies used in treatment of gynecologic cancers and to evaluate and recommend potential interventions to mitigate toxic effects on ovarian function. Chemotherapeutic agents can cause direct loss of oocytes and primordial follicles as well as stromal and vascular atrophy and the extent is dependent upon mechanism of action and age of the patient. The risk of ovarian failure is the highest with alkylating agents (42.2 %), anthracyclines (<10-34 % in patients under 40 years versus 98 % in patients aged 40-49), taxanes (57.1 %) and platinum agents (50 %). Multiple trials demonstrate that gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, when administered concurrently with chemotherapy, may have protective effects, with more patients experiencing resumption of a regular menstruation pattern and recovering ovarian function more quickly post-treatment. Premenopausal patients receiving chemotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancers should receive adequate counseling on the potential adverse effects on their fertility. Although oocyte cryopreservation remains the gold standard for fertility preservation, there is some evidence to suggest that GNRH agonists could help maintain and preserve ovarian function and should be considered.

Neighborhood deprivation and racial differences in in vitro fertilization outcomes

BACKGROUND

There are significant racial disparities in in vitro fertilization outcomes, which are poorly explained by individual-level characteristics. Environmental factors such as neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors may contribute to these disparities. However, few studies have directly addressed this research question in a large, racially diverse cohort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether neighborhood deprivation is associated with differences in in vitro fertilization outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Our retrospective cohort study included 1110 patients who underwent 2254 autologous in vitro fertilization cycles between 2014 and 2019 at an academic fertility center in the Southeastern United States. Neighborhood deprivation was estimated using the Neighborhood Deprivation Index, a composite variable measuring community levels of material capital based on poverty, occupation, housing, and education domains. Using multivariable log-binomial generalized estimating equations with cluster weighting, risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for cycle cancellation, miscarriage (defined as spontaneous pregnancy loss before 20 weeks after a confirmed intrauterine gestation), and live birth according to patient Neighborhood Deprivation Index.

RESULTS

There were positive associations between increasing Neighborhood Deprivation Index (indicating worsening neighborhood deprivation) and body mass index, as well as increasing prevalence of tubal and uterine factor infertility diagnoses. The crude probability of live birth per cycle was lower among Black (24%) than among White patients (32%), and the crude probability of miscarriage per clinical pregnancy was higher among Black (22%) than among White patients (12%). After adjustment, the Neighborhood Deprivation Index was not significantly associated with risk of cycle cancellation or live birth. Results were consistent when analyses were stratified by race.

CONCLUSION

Our research demonstrates racial disparities between Black and White women in the incidence of miscarriage and live birth following in vitro fertilization. Although the level of neighborhood deprivation was closely related to race, it did not have strong associations with in vitro fertilization outcomes in our population as a whole or within strata of race.