Rosenberg KL, Burns A, Caplin B. Effect of ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation on uptake of renal supportive care and dialysis decision-making in older adults.
Clin Kidney J 2023;
16:2164-2173. [PMID:
37915922 PMCID:
PMC10616494 DOI:
10.1093/ckj/sfad108]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Renal supportive care has become an increasingly relevant treatment option as the renal patient population ages. Despite the prevalence of kidney disease amongst ethnic minority and socioeconomically deprived patients, evidence focused on supportive care and dialysis decision-making in these groups is limited.
Methods
This retrospective study selected older patients referred to a low clearance or supportive care service between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. A descriptive analysis of clinical and socioeconomic characteristics according to treatment choice was produced and multivariate logistic regression models used to identify predictive factors for choosing supportive care. Surrogate markers for the success of decision-making processes were evaluated, including time taken to reach a supportive care decision and risk of death without making a treatment decision or within 3 months of starting kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Finally, the association between ethnicity and socioeconomic status and hospital admission rates was compared between treatment groups.
Results
Amongst 1768 patients, 515 chose supportive care and 309 chose KRT. Predictive factors for choosing supportive care included age, frailty and a diagnosis of cognitive impairment. However, there was no association with ethnicity or deprivation. Similarly, these factors were not associated with time taken to make a supportive care decision or the mortality outcome. Amongst those on KRT, more socially advantaged patients had decreased rates of hospital admissions compared with those less advantaged (incident rate ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.92-0.99).
Conclusion
Predictive factors for choosing supportive care were clinical, rather than socioeconomic. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with increased rates of hospitalization in the KRT group. This is a possible signal that these groups experienced greater morbidity on KRT versus supportive care, an association not demonstrated amongst higher socioeconomic groups.
Collapse