Therapeutic relationships in speech-language pathology: A scoping review of empirical studies

PURPOSE

This scoping review provides an overview of empirical studies investigating therapeutic relationships between speech-language pathologists (SLPs), clients, and caregivers across all ages and clinical areas, and identifies areas of future research.

METHOD

The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) scoping review method was employed. Systematic searches were conducted across seven databases and four grey literature databases. Research published in English and German until 3 August 2020 was included. Data were extracted for the primary aim, terminology and theoretical foundations, research design, and focus. Central findings concerning the input-, process-, outcome-, and output-level of speech-language pathology were categorised.

RESULT

Of 5479 articles, 44 articles were included in the analysis. Psychotherapy was the leading discipline for the theoretical foundation and measurement of relationship quality. Most findings focused on therapeutic attitudes, qualities, and relational actions to build the basis of a positive therapeutic relationship. A small number of studies indicated connections between clinical outcomes and the quality of the relationships.

CONCLUSION

Future research needs to address precision of terminology, expansion of qualitative and quantitative research methods, development and psychometric examination of measuring instruments specific to SLPs and the development and evaluation of concepts to support professional relationship building in speech-language pathology training and everyday work.

Therapeutic relationships in speech-language pathology: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of empirical research regarding the therapeutic relationship between speech-language pathologists and their clients of all ages and clinical areas.

INTRODUCTION

The influence of a positive relationship between professionals and clients on the process and outcome of interventions is well documented for many health professions. However, research in speech-language pathology predominantly focuses on the outcome of specific treatment methods and techniques. The number of empirical research studies on the therapeutic relationship within this research area is increasing. At present, existing research has not been summarized and compared.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review will include all empirical research that addresses the therapeutic relationship between speech-language pathologists and their clients of all ages and clinical areas. Since speech-language pathologists often collaborate intensively with caregivers of their clients, such as parents or partners, these groups will also be included.

METHODS

Systematic searches will be conducted across seven research databases (ASHAWire, CINAHL, ERIC, Fachportal Pädagogik, LIVIVO, MEDLINE [PubMed], and PsycINFO) and four unpublished/gray literature databases (evidenssst, ndldt, OpenGrey, and SSOAR). Data will be extracted by two independent reviewers for author(s), year of publication, country of origin, research questions, participants, terminology and theoretical foundations, research design, and focus. Central findings concerning the therapeutic relationship on the input-, process-, outcome, and output-level of speech-language interventions will be analyzed. Results will be presented as a narrative summary.

The capacity for volitional control of pharyngeal swallowing in healthy adults

INTRODUCTION

Previous research has documented that pressure and duration of brainstem-generated pharyngeal swallowing can be cortically modulated. But there is a commonly held belief that the sequence of pharyngeal pressure remains constant. However, Huckabee et al. [19] reported a patient cohort who demonstrated reduced latency of peak pressure in the proximal and distal pharynx, disproportionate and sometimes inversely correlated with overall swallowing duration, suggesting independent timing of underlying muscle contraction within the overall pharyngeal response. This study examined if healthy adults can volitionally produce altered latency of pharyngeal closure in isolation following intensive training, thereby evaluating the capacity for pharyngeal adaptation in a healthy system.

METHOD

Six healthy participants were seen for intensive training, consisting of daily one-hour sessions over two weeks (10 days) using pharyngeal manometry as a visual biofeedback modality. The participants were instructed to produce simultaneous pressure in the pharyngeal sensors when swallowing. The temporal separation of peak proximal and distal pharyngeal pressure was measured with discrete-sensor pharyngeal manometry at baseline, during training with biofeedback, and following training without biofeedback.

RESULTS

Following intensive training, participants were able to reduce temporal separation of peak pressure between the proximal and distal pharyngeal sensors from a baseline median of 188 ms (IQR=231 ms) to 68 ms (IQR=92 ms; p=0.002). In contrast, there was no significant change in overall swallowing duration during training (p=0.41). However, change in pharyngeal pressure latency was moderately correlated with both change in swallowing duration (r=0.444) and amplitude (r=0.571) during training, and there was a reduction in swallowing duration post-training (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Given intensive manometric biofeedback training, participants substantially reduced temporal separation of peak proximal and distal pharyngeal pressure when volitionally swallowing. However, correlation with overall pressure and duration measures suggest the adaptation was one of modulating the cumulative pharyngeal response rather than altering discrete components of timing of pharyngeal pressure in isolation. This is inconsistent with the pattern of behaviour documented by Huckabee et al. [19] in the patient population. Further research on modulatory control over targeted aspects of the pharyngeal swallow is needed, and may provide avenues for rehabilitative treatment of patients with dysphagia.