Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional treatment comprises warfarin-mediated anticoagulation; it is unclear whether non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) exhibit comparable efficacy and safety. Limited data are available for Asian patients. This study compared NOACs with warfarin in terms of clinical efficacy and safety for managing LVT.

METHODS

Clinical and echocardiographic records were retrieved for all adult patients with echocardiography-confirmed LVT at a major regional centre in Hong Kong from January 2011 to January 2020. Discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year was recorded. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving NOACs and those receiving warfarin. Primary outcomes were cumulative mortality and net adverse clinical events (NACEs). Secondary outcomes were complete LVT resolution and percentage reduction in LVT size at 3 months.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included; 28 received warfarin and 15 received NOACs, with follow-up periods (mean ± standard deviation) of 20 ± 12 months and 22 ± 9 months, respectively (P=0.522). Use of NOACs was associated with significantly lower NACE risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.111, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.012-0.994; P=0.049) and a tendency towards lower cumulative mortality (HR=0.184, 95% CI=0.032-1.059; P=0.058). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Considering LVT resolution, discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year was not significantly associated with different outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants may be an efficacious and safe alternative to warfarin for LVT management. Future studies should explore the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation discontinuation by 1 year as an overall strategy.

Addressing the risk and management of cardiometabolic complications in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy: consensus statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology

Background

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the foundational treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Androgen receptor (AR) axis-targeted therapies are a new standard of care for advanced PCa. Although these agents have significantly improved patient survival, the suppression of testosterone is associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic syndrome. This highlights the urgency of multidisciplinary efforts to address the cardiometabolic risk of anticancer treatment in men with PCa.

Methods

Two professional organizations invited five urologists, five clinical oncologists, and two cardiologists to form a consensus panel. They reviewed the relevant literature obtained by searching PubMed for the publication period from April 2013 to April 2023, to address three discussion areas: (i) baseline assessment and screening for risk factors in PCa patients before the initiation of ADT and AR axis-targeted therapies; (ii) follow-up and management of cardiometabolic complications; and (iii) selection of ADT agents among high-risk patients. The panel convened four meetings to discuss and draft consensus statements using a modified Delphi method. Each drafted statement was anonymously voted on by every panelist.

Results

The panel reached a consensus on 18 statements based on recent evidence and expert insights.

Conclusion

These consensus statements serve as a practical recommendation for clinicians in Hong Kong, and possibly the Asia-Pacific region, in the management of cardiometabolic toxicities of ADT or AR axis-targeted therapies in men with PCa.

High Prevalence of Late-Onset Fabry Cardiomyopathy in a Cohort of 499 Non-Selective Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Asian Fabry Cardiomyopathy High-Risk Screening Study (ASIAN-FAME)

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) caused by cardiac variant Fabry disease (FD) is typically late-onset and may mimic LVH caused by abnormal loading conditions. We aimed to determine the prevalence of FD in a non-selective patient population of everyday practice presenting with LVH, including those with hypertension and valve disease. We measured plasma alpha-galactosidase A activity using dried blood spot tests in 499 (age = 66 ± 13 years; 336 men) Hong Kong Chinese patients with LVH defined as maximal LV septal/posterior wall thickness ≥13 mm on echocardiography. Patients with low enzyme activity underwent mutation analysis of the GLA gene. Eight (age = 53−74 years; all men) unrelated patients (1.6%) had low plasma alpha-galactosidase A activity (0.57 ± 0.27 μmol/L wb/hr) and all were confirmed to have the GLA IVS4 + 919G > A mutation. FD patients presented with heart failure (n = 5), heart block (n = 2), ventricular tachycardia (n = 1), chest pain (n = 3), and/or murmur (n = 1). Uncontrolled hypertension (n = 4) and/or severe mitral/aortic valve pathology (n = 2) were frequent. Ethnic subgroups included Teochew (n = 5), Canton (n = 2), and Wenzhou (n = 1). Endomyocardial biopsy (n = 6) revealed hypertrophic myocytes with vacuolization and dense lamellar bodies. Late-onset IVS4 + 919G > A FD is prevalent among Chinese LVH patients, and should be considered as a cause of LVH in adult patients even when hypertension and/or valve pathology are present.

Screening for Fabry Disease in patients with unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy

Fabry Disease (FD) is a systemic disorder that can result in cardiovascular, renal, and neurovascular disease leading to reduced life expectancy. FD should be considered in the differential of all patients with unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We therefore performed a prospective screening study in Edmonton and Hong Kong using Dried Blood Spot (DBS) testing on patients with undiagnosed LVH. Participants found to have unexplained LVH on echocardiography were invited to participate and subsequently subjected to DBS testing. DBS testing was used to measure α-galactosidase (α-GAL) enzyme activity and for mutation analysis of the α-galactosidase (GLA) gene, both of which are required to make a diagnosis of FD. DBS testing was performed as a screening tool on patients (n = 266) in Edmonton and Hong Kong, allowing for detection of five patients with FD (2% prevalence of FD) and one patient with hydroxychloroquine-induced phenocopy. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by GLA genotype showed a higher LVMI in patients with IVS4 + 919G > A mutations compared to those without the mutation. Two patients were initiated on ERT and hydroxychloroquine was discontinued in the patient with a phenocopy of FD. Overall, we detected FD in 2% of our screening cohort using DBS testing as an effective and easy to administer screening tool in patients with unexplained LVH. Utilizing DBS testing to screen for FD in patients with otherwise undiagnosed LVH is clinically important due to the availability of effective therapies and the value of cascade screening in extended families.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade for cardiovascular diseases: current status

Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) results in vasoconstriction, muscular (vascular and cardiac) hypertrophy and fibrosis. Established arterial stiffness and cardiac dysfunction are key factors contributing to subsequent cardiovascular and renal complications. Blockade of RAAS has been shown to be beneficial in patients with hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, chronic systolic heart failure, stroke and diabetic renal disease. An aggressive approach for more extensive RAAS blockade with combination of two commonly used RAAS blockers [ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)] yielded conflicting results in different patient populations. Combination therapy is also associated with more side effects, in particular hypotension, hyperkalaemia and renal impairment. Recently published ONTARGET study showed ACEI/ARB combination therapy was associated with more adverse effects without any increase in benefit. The Canadian Hypertension Education Program responded with a new warning: 'Do not use ACEI and ARB in combination'. However, the European Society of Cardiology in their updated heart failure treatment guidelines still recommended ACEI/ARB combo as a viable option. This apparent inconsistency among guidelines generates debate as to which approach of RAAS inhibition is the best. The current paper reviews the latest evidence of isolated ACEI or ARB use and their combination in cardiovascular diseases, and makes recommendations for their prescriptions in specific patient populations.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade for cardiovascular diseases: current status

Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) results in vasoconstriction, muscular (vascular and cardiac) hypertrophy and fibrosis. Established arterial stiffness and cardiac dysfunction are key factors contributing to subsequent cardiovascular and renal complications. Blockade of RAAS has been shown to be beneficial in patients with hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, chronic systolic heart failure, stroke and diabetic renal disease. An aggressive approach for more extensive RAAS blockade with combination of two commonly used RAAS blockers [ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)] yielded conflicting results in different patient populations. Combination therapy is also associated with more side effects, in particular hypotension, hyperkalaemia and renal impairment. Recently published ONTARGET study showed ACEI/ARB combination therapy was associated with more adverse effects without any increase in benefit. The Canadian Hypertension Education Program responded with a new warning: 'Do not use ACEI and ARB in combination'. However, the European Society of Cardiology in their updated heart failure treatment guidelines still recommended ACEI/ARB combo as a viable option. This apparent inconsistency among guidelines generates debate as to which approach of RAAS inhibition is the best. The current paper reviews the latest evidence of isolated ACEI or ARB use and their combination in cardiovascular diseases, and makes recommendations for their prescriptions in specific patient populations.