Giving Voice to Cardiovocal Syndrome: A 26-Year-Old Woman With Hypophonia and Dysphagia

Are children's hospitals only for children? Practically speaking, they and their associated specialty clinics often provide necessary medical and surgical care for patients older than 18 years, especially those with medical complexity. For this reason, pediatric practitioners must be familiar with both childhood-onset conditions and problems common in older and larger individuals. This case report describes a 26-year-old woman with CHARGE syndrome (coloboma/cranial nerve palsy, heart defects, atresia of the choanae, restricted development/growth, genitourinary abnormalities, ear abnormalities) who presented to a children's hospital with hypophonia and dysphagia and was ultimately diagnosed with left recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy due to untreated sleep apnea and uncontrolled congestive heart failure leading to pulmonary hypertension that exacerbated her congenital cardiovascular abnormalities. Her hospitalization, during which she was cared for by two Internal Medicine-Pediatrics physicians (among others), exemplifies common themes in Med-Peds practice, such as a potential mismatch of expectations, experience, equipment, and policies when adults are admitted to children's hospital, as well as an all-too-familiar lag in transitioning from pediatric to adult care for children and youth with special healthcare needs (CYSHCN).

Developing a Web-Based Asynchronous Case Discussion Format on Social Media to Teach Clinical Reasoning: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Case-based learning conferences are valuable to trainees, but growing clinical demands hinder consistent attendance. Social media increasingly acts as a venue for trainees to supplement their education asynchronously. We designed and implemented a web-based asynchronous clinical case discussion series on the Twitter social media platform to fill this educational gap.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this mixed methods study is to examine the nature of interactions among web-based case discussion participants and assess local attitudes regarding the educational intervention.

METHODS

Starting in February 2018, we posted clinical vignettes to a dedicated Twitter account with the prompt "What else do you want to know?" to stimulate discussion. The authors replied in real time when case discussion participants requested additional details. Additional data about the case were posted at regular intervals to the discussion thread to advance the overall case discussion. Participants were asked to explain their reasoning and support their conclusions when appropriate. Web-based engagement was assessed using Twitter Analytics. Participants' posts were qualitatively analyzed for themes, with special attention to examples of using clinical reasoning skills. A codebook of types of participant posts and interactions was refined iteratively. Local engagement and attitudes at our institution were assessed by surveying internal medicine trainees (n=182) and faculty (n=165) after 6 months.

RESULTS

Over a 6-month period, 11 live case discussions were engaged with by users 1773 times. A total of 86 Twitter profiles spanning 22 US states and 6 countries contributed to discussions among participants and the authors. Participants from all training levels were present, ranging from students to faculty. Interactions among participants and the case moderators were most commonly driven by clinical reasoning, including hypothesis-driven information gathering, discussing the differential diagnosis, and data interpretation or organization. Of 71 respondents to the local survey, 29 (41%) reported having a Twitter account. Of the 29 respondents with Twitter accounts, 17 (59%) reported participating in the case discussions. Respondents agreed that case participation increased both their clinical reasoning skills (15/17, 88%) and clinical knowledge (13/17, 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

A social media-based serialized case discussion was a feasible asynchronous teaching method for engaging web-based learners of all levels in a clinical reasoning discussion. Further study should examine what factors drive trainee participation in web-based case discussions and under what circumstances asynchronous discussion might be preferred over in-person teaching activities.