1
|
Diedrich B, Rigbolt KT, Röring M, Herr R, Kaeser-Pebernard S, Gretzmeier C, Murphy RF, Brummer T, Dengjel J. Discrete cytosolic macromolecular BRAF complexes exhibit distinct activities and composition. EMBO J 2017; 36:646-663. [PMID: 28093501 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201694732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Revised: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
As a central element within the RAS/ERK pathway, the serine/threonine kinase BRAF plays a key role in development and homeostasis and represents the most frequently mutated kinase in tumors. Consequently, it has emerged as an important therapeutic target in various malignancies. Nevertheless, the BRAF activation cycle still raises many mechanistic questions as illustrated by the paradoxical action and side effects of RAF inhibitors. By applying SEC-PCP-SILAC, we analyzed protein-protein interactions of hyperactive BRAFV600E and wild-type BRAF (BRAFWT). We identified two macromolecular, cytosolic BRAF complexes of distinct molecular composition and phosphorylation status. Hyperactive BRAFV600E resides in large complexes of higher molecular mass and activity, while BRAFWT is confined to smaller, slightly less active complexes. However, expression of oncogenic K-RasG12V, either by itself or in combination with RAF dimer promoting inhibitors, induces the incorporation of BRAFWT into large, active complexes, whereas pharmacological inhibition of BRAFV600E has the opposite effect. Thus, the quaternary structure of BRAF complexes is shaped by its activation status, the conformation of its kinase domain, and clinically relevant inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britta Diedrich
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kristoffer Tg Rigbolt
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Röring
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Cell Research (IMMZ), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ricarda Herr
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Cell Research (IMMZ), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Christine Gretzmeier
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Robert F Murphy
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Computational Biology Department and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Tilman Brummer
- ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany .,Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine and Cell Research (IMMZ), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Centre for Biological Signalling Studies BIOSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Freiburg, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörn Dengjel
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany .,ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.,Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Centre for Biological Signalling Studies BIOSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rigbolt KT, Zarei M, Sprenger A, Becker AC, Diedrich B, Huang X, Eiselein S, Kristensen AR, Gretzmeier C, Andersen JS, Zi Z, Dengjel J. Characterization of early autophagy signaling by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Autophagy 2013; 10:356-71. [PMID: 24275748 DOI: 10.4161/auto.26864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Under conditions of nutrient shortage autophagy is the primary cellular mechanism ensuring availability of substrates for continuous biosynthesis. Subjecting cells to starvation or rapamycin efficiently induces autophagy by inhibiting the MTOR signaling pathway triggering increased autophagic flux. To elucidate the regulation of early signaling events upon autophagy induction, we applied quantitative phosphoproteomics characterizing the temporal phosphorylation dynamics after starvation and rapamycin treatment. We obtained a comprehensive atlas of phosphorylation kinetics within the first 30 min upon induction of autophagy with both treatments affecting widely different cellular processes. The identification of dynamic phosphorylation already after 2 min demonstrates that the earliest events in autophagy signaling occur rapidly after induction. The data was subjected to extensive bioinformatics analysis revealing regulated phosphorylation sites on proteins involved in a wide range of cellular processes and an impact of the treatments on the kinome. To approach the potential function of the identified phosphorylation sites we performed a screen for MAP1LC3-interacting proteins and identified a group of binding partners exhibiting dynamic phosphorylation patterns. The data presented here provide a valuable resource on phosphorylation events underlying early autophagy induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristoffer Tg Rigbolt
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mostafa Zarei
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Adrian Sprenger
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany; Department of Dermatology; University Freiburg Medical Center; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andrea C Becker
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Britta Diedrich
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Xun Huang
- BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sven Eiselein
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany; BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anders R Kristensen
- Centre for High-throughput Biology; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC CA
| | - Christine Gretzmeier
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jens S Andersen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; University of Southern Denmark; Odense, Denmark
| | - Zhike Zi
- BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jörn Dengjel
- Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS); School of Life Sciences-LifeNet; Freiburg, Germany; ZBSA Center for Biological Systems Analysis; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany; Department of Dermatology; University Freiburg Medical Center; Freiburg, Germany; BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies; University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Halbach S, Rigbolt KT, Wöhrle FU, Diedrich B, Gretzmeier C, Brummer T, Dengjel J. Alterations of Gab2 signalling complexes in imatinib and dasatinib treated chronic myeloid leukaemia cells. Cell Commun Signal 2013; 11:30. [PMID: 23607741 PMCID: PMC3640961 DOI: 10.1186/1478-811x-11-30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Gab2 docking protein acts as an important signal amplifier downstream of various growth factor receptors and Bcr-Abl, the driver of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Despite the success of Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the therapy of CML, TKI-resistance remains an unsolved problem in the clinic. We have recently shown that Gab2 signalling counteracts the efficacy of four distinct Bcr-Abl inhibitors. In the course of that project, we noticed that two clinically relevant drugs, imatinib and dasatinib, provoke distinct alterations in the electrophoretic mobility of Gab2, its signalling output and protein interactions. As the signalling potential of the docking protein is highly modulated by its phosphorylation status, we set out to obtain more insights into the impact of TKIs on Gab2 phosphorylation. FINDINGS Using stable isotope labelling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative mass spectrometry (MS), we show now that imatinib and dasatinib provoke distinct effects on the phosphorylation status and interactome of Gab2. This study identifies several new phosphorylation sites on Gab2 and confirms many sites previously known from other experimental systems. At equimolar concentrations, dasatinib is more effective in preventing Gab2 tyrosine and serine/threonine phosphorylation than imatinib. It also affects the phosphorylation status of more residues than imatinib. In addition, we also identify novel components of the Gab2 signalling complex, such as casein kinases, stathmins and PIP1 as well as known interaction partners whose association with Gab2 is disrupted by imatinib and/or dasatinib. CONCLUSIONS By using MS-based proteomics, we have identified new and confirmed known phosphorylation sites and interaction partners of Gab2, which may play an important role in the regulation of this docking protein. Given the growing importance of Gab2 in several tumour entities we expect that our results will help to understand the complex regulation of Gab2 and how this docking protein can contribute to malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Halbach
- Institute of Molecular Medicine and Cell Research (IMMZ), Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str, 17, Freiburg 79104, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|