1
|
Ryan JM, Wagner KT, Yerram S, Concannon C, Lin JX, Rooney P, Hanrahan B, Titoff V, Connolly NL, Cranmer R, DeMaria N, Xia X, Mykins B, Erickson S, Couderc JP, Schifitto G, Hughes I, Wang D, Erba G, Auerbach DS. Heart rate and autonomic biomarkers distinguish convulsive epileptic vs. functional or dissociative seizures. Seizure 2023; 111:178-186. [PMID: 37660533 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE 20-40% of individuals whose seizures are not controlled by anti-seizure medications exhibit manifestations comparable to epileptic seizures (ES), but there are no EEG correlates. These events are called functional or dissociative seizures (FDS). Due to limited access to EEG-monitoring and inconclusive results, we aimed to develop an alternative diagnostic tool that distinguishes ES vs. FDS. We evaluated the temporal evolution of ECG-based measures of autonomic function (heart rate variability, HRV) to determine whether they distinguish ES vs. FDS. METHODS The prospective study includes patients admitted to the University of Rochester Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. Participants are 18-65 years old, without therapies or co-morbidities associated with altered autonomics. A habitual ES or FDS is recorded during admission. HRV analysis is performed to evaluate the temporal changes in autonomic function during the peri‑ictal period (150-minutes each pre-/post-ictal). We determined if autonomic measures distinguish ES vs. FDS. RESULTS The study includes 53 ES and 46 FDS. Temporal evolution of HR and autonomics significantly differ surrounding ES vs. FDS. The pre-to-post-ictal change (delta) in HR differs surrounding ES vs. FDS, stratified for convulsive and non-convulsive events. Post-ictal HR, total autonomic (SDNN & Total Power), vagal (RMSSD & HF), and baroreflex (LF) function differ for convulsive ES vs. convulsive FDS. HR distinguishes non-convulsive ES vs. non-convulsive FDS with ROC>0.7, sensitivity>70%, but specificity<50%. HR-delta and post-ictal HR, SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF, and Total Power each distinguish convulsive ES vs. convulsive FDS (ROC, 0.83-0.98). Models with HR-delta and post-ictal HR provide the highest diagnostic accuracy for convulsive ES vs. convulsive FDS: 92% sensitivity, 94% specificity, ROC 0.99). SIGNIFICANCE HR and HRV measures accurately distinguish convulsive, but not non-convulsive, events (ES vs. FDS). Results establish the framework for future studies to apply this diagnostic tool to more heterogeneous populations, and on out-of-hospital recordings, particularly for populations without access to epilepsy monitoring units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Ryan
- Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Kyle T Wagner
- Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Sushma Yerram
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Cathleen Concannon
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Jennifer X Lin
- School of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Patrick Rooney
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Brian Hanrahan
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Victoria Titoff
- Department of Neurology-Epilepsy, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States; Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Noreen L Connolly
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Ramona Cranmer
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Natalia DeMaria
- Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Xiaojuan Xia
- Clinical Cardiology Research Center Medicine-Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Betty Mykins
- Clinical Cardiology Research Center Medicine-Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Steven Erickson
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Jean-Philippe Couderc
- Clinical Cardiology Research Center Medicine-Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Giovanni Schifitto
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Inna Hughes
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Dongliang Wang
- Department of Public Health, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Giuseppe Erba
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - David S Auerbach
- Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian J, Min Y, Rodgers Z, Wan X, Qiu H, Mi Y, Tian X, Wagner KT, Caster JM, Qi Y, Roche K, Zhang T, Cheng J, Wang AZ. Nanoparticle delivery of chemotherapy combination regimen improves the therapeutic efficacy in mouse models of lung cancer. Nanomedicine 2016; 13:1301-1307. [PMID: 27884641 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The combination chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin (CP) and docetaxel (DTX) is effective against a variety of cancers. However, combination therapies present unique challenges that can complicate clinical application, such as increases in toxicity and imprecise exposure of tumors to specific drug ratios that can produce treatment resistance. Drug co-encapsulation within a single nanoparticle (NP) formulation can overcome these challenges and further improve combinations' therapeutic index. In this report, we employ a CP prodrug (CPP) strategy to formulate poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLGA-PEG) NPs carrying both CPP and DTX. The dually loaded NPs display differences in drug release kinetics and in vitro cytotoxicity based on the structure of the chosen CPP. Furthermore, NPs containing both drugs showed a significant improvement in treatment efficacy versus the free drug combination in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Tian
- School of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Tianjin Vocational Institute, Tianjin, PR China; Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yuangzeng Min
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Zachary Rodgers
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Xiaomeng Wan
- Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hui Qiu
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yu Mi
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Xi Tian
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kyle T Wagner
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joseph M Caster
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yanfei Qi
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Kyle Roche
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tian Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jianjun Cheng
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Andrew Z Wang
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tian X, Warner SB, Wagner KT, Caster JM, Zhang T, Ohana P, Gabizon AA, Wang AZ. Preclinical Evaluation of Promitil, a Radiation-Responsive Liposomal Formulation of Mitomycin C Prodrug, in Chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:547-55. [PMID: 27681751 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.2457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Revised: 06/18/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the effect of radiation on in vitro drug activation and release of Promitil, a pegylated liposomal formulation of a mitomycin C (MMC) lipid-based prodrug; and examine the efficacy and toxicity of Promitil with concurrent radiation in colorectal cancer models. METHODS AND MATERIALS Promitil was obtained from Lipomedix Pharmaceuticals (Jerusalem, Israel). We tested the effects of radiation on release of active MMC from Promitil in vitro. We next examined the radiosensitization effect of Promitil in vitro. We further evaluated the toxicity of a single injection of free MMC or Promitil when combined with radiation by assessing the effects on blood counts and in-field skin and hair toxicity. Finally, we compared the efficacy of MMC and Promitil in chemoradiotherapy using mouse xenograft models. RESULTS Mitomycin C was activated and released from Promitil in a controlled-release profile, and the rate of release was significantly increased in medium from previously irradiated cells. Both Promitil and MMC potently radiosensitized HT-29 cells in vitro. Toxicity of MMC (8.4 mg/kg) was substantially greater than with equivalent doses of Promitil (30 mg/kg). Mice treated with human-equivalent doses of MMC (3.3 mg/kg) experienced comparable levels of toxicity as Promitil-treated mice at 30 mg/kg. Promitil improved the antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy in mouse xenograft models of colorectal cancer, while equitoxic doses of MMC did not. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that Promitil is an attractive agent for chemoradiotherapy because it demonstrates a radiation-triggered release of active drug. We further demonstrated that Promitil is a well-tolerated and potent radiosensitizer at doses not achievable with free MMC. These results support clinical investigations using Promitil in chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Tian
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Samuel B Warner
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kyle T Wagner
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joseph M Caster
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Tian Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Alberto A Gabizon
- Lipomedix Pharmaceuticals, Jerusalem, Israel; Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Andrew Z Wang
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tian X, Lara H, Wagner KT, Saripalli S, Hyder SN, Foote M, Sethi M, Wang E, Caster JM, Zhang L, Wang AZ. Improving DNA double-strand repair inhibitor KU55933 therapeutic index in cancer radiotherapy using nanoparticle drug delivery. Nanoscale 2015; 7:20211-9. [PMID: 26575637 PMCID: PMC4664156 DOI: 10.1039/c5nr05869d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a key component of cancer treatment. Because of its importance, there has been high interest in developing agents and strategies to further improve the therapeutic index of radiotherapy. DNA double-strand repair inhibitors (DSBRIs) are among the most promising agents to improve radiotherapy. However, their clinical translation has been limited by their potential toxicity to normal tissue. Recent advances in nanomedicine offer an opportunity to overcome this limitation. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the proof of principle by developing and evaluating nanoparticle (NP) formulations of KU55933, a DSBRI. We engineered a NP formulation of KU55933 using nanoprecipitation method with different lipid polymer nanoparticle formulation. NP KU55933 using PLGA formulation has the best loading efficacy as well as prolonged drug release profile. We demonstrated that NP KU55933 is a potent radiosensitizer in vitro using clonogenic assay and is more effective as a radiosensitizer than free KU55933 in vivo using mouse xenograft models of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Western blots and immunofluorescence showed NP KU55933 exhibited more prolonged inhibition of DNA repair pathway. In addition, NP KU55933 leads to lower skin toxicity than KU55933. Our study supports further investigations using NP to deliver DSBRIs to improve cancer radiotherapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Tian
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
TIAN XI, Nguyen M, Foote H, Wagner KT, Sanoff HK, McRee AJ, O'Neil BH, Calvo BF, Blackstock WA, Tepper JE, Garmey E, Eliasof S, Wang AZ. Abstract 5515: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer with CRLX101, an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-5515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: There has been great interest in developing novel agents and strategies to improve chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer. Irinotecan, a campothecin (CPT) analogue, held high potential, but the combination was clinically infeasible due to severe gastrointestinal toxicities. CRLX101, is an investigational nanoparticle drug conjugate (NDC). Preclinical experiments showed that CRLX101 differentially delivers CPT into cancer cells and appears to durably suppress HIF-1α as well as topoisomerase 1, but with less gastrointestinal toxicities than irinotecan. We therefore hypothesized that the addition of CRLX101 to rectal CRT (5-FU + XRT) may further improve the therapeutic index in this setting.
Methods: Synergy with CRLX101 in combination with either XRT or CRT was studied in vitro (SW480 and HT29 colorectal cancer cell lines) and in vivo (murine flank xenograft models). Skin toxicity and hematologic toxicity were also characterized. In order to test the synergy hypothesis in the clinic, a Phase Ib/II clinical trial (LCCC1315) evaluating the addition of CRLX101 to CRT in the neo-adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer is currently underway. A standard 3 + 3 design is being employed for the phase Ib with a CRLX101 starting dose of 12 mg/m2 in the first cohort escalating to the CRLX101 monotherapy MTD of 15 mg/m2 in the second. The primary phase 2 end-point is the pathological complete response (pCR) rate from treatment.
Results: CRLX101 was found to be as potent as camptothecin in vitro. We have demonstrated that CRLX101 functions by inhibition of both DNA repair and HIF-1α signaling. The addition of CRLX101 to radiotherapy increased and prolonged the number of γH2AX foci, even at 24 hours post radiotherapy. We also confirmed that CRLX101 decreased HIF-1α and its downstream targets VEGF and carbonic anhydrase IX in mice bearing HT29 xenografts. Our findings were further validated in vivo: we demonstrated that both CRLX101+5FU+XRT and CRLX101+XRT delayed tumor growth more than other regimens (p-values < 0.05). More importantly, we found CRT with CRLX101+5FU is significantly more effective than CRT with oxaliplatin+5FU (25 days to double tumor volume vs. 11 days), a regimen that has been extensively studied clinically. Preclinical toxicity studies demonstrated that the addition of CRLX101 did not increase hematologic or skin toxicities. In the ongoing clinical trial, none of the first 6 patients enrolled have experienced dose-limiting toxicities, and 1 out of 3 patients who underwent surgery had a pCR. The other 2 patients had extensive treatment response with minimal residual tumor.
Conclusions: Preclinical data suggests that CRLX101 improves the therapeutic index of CRT for rectal cancer. Preliminary clinical data is encouraging, and supports further clinical assessment of CRLX101+5FU+XRT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Citation Format: XI TIAN, Minh Nguyen, Henry Foote, Kyle T. Wagner, Hanna K. Sanoff, Autumn J. McRee, Bert H. O'Neil, Benjamin F. Calvo, William A. Blackstock, Joel E. Tepper, Edward Garmey, Scott Eliasof, Andrew Z. Wang. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer with CRLX101, an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5515. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5515
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- XI TIAN
- 1University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Minh Nguyen
- 1University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Henry Foote
- 1University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kyle T. Wagner
- 1University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Joel E. Tepper
- 1University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Andrew Z. Wang
- 1University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Caster JM, Sethi M, Kowalczyk S, Wang E, Tian X, Nabeel Hyder S, Wagner KT, Zhang YA, Kapadia C, Man Au K, Wang AZ. Nanoparticle delivery of chemosensitizers improve chemotherapy efficacy without incurring additional toxicity. Nanoscale 2015; 7:2805-11. [PMID: 25584654 PMCID: PMC4408549 DOI: 10.1039/c4nr07102f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Chemosensitizers can improve the therapeutic index of chemotherapy and overcome treatment resistance. Successful translation of chemosensitizers depends on the development of strategies that can preferentially deliver chemosensitizers to tumors while avoiding normal tissue. We hypothesized that nanoparticle (NP) formulation of chemosensitizers can improve their delivery to tumors which can in turn improve their therapeutic index. To demonstrate the proof of principle of this approach, we engineered NP formulations of two chemosensitizers, the PI3-kindase inhibitor wortmanin (Wtmn) and the PARP inhibitor olaparib. NP Wtmn and NP olaparib were evaluated as chemosensitizers using lung cancer cells and breast cancer cells respectively. We found Wtmn to be an efficient chemosensitizer in all tested lung-cancer cell lines reducing tumor cell growth between 20 and 60% compared to drug alone. NP formulation did not decrease its efficacy in vitro. Olaparib showed less consistent chemosensitization as a free drug or in NP formulation. NP Wtmn was further evaluated as a chemosensitizer using mouse models of lung cancer. We found that NP Wtmn is an effective chemosensitizer and more effective than free Wtmn showing a 32% reduction in tumor growth compared to free Wtmn when given with etoposide. Importantly, NP Wtmn was able to sensitize the multi-drug resistant H69AR cells to etoposide. Additionally, the combination of NP Wtmn and etoposide chemotherapy did not significantly increase toxicity. The present study demonstrates the proof of principle of using NP formulation of chemosensitizing drugs to improve the therapeutic index of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Caster
- Laboratory of Nano- and Translational Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ronau JA, Paul LN, Fuchs JE, Corn IR, Wagner KT, Liedl KR, Abu-Omar MM, Das C. An additional substrate binding site in a bacterial phenylalanine hydroxylase. Eur Biophys J 2013; 42:691-708. [PMID: 23860686 PMCID: PMC3972754 DOI: 10.1007/s00249-013-0919-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2013] [Revised: 06/20/2013] [Accepted: 06/26/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) is a non-heme iron enzyme that catalyzes oxidation of phenylalanine to tyrosine, a reaction that must be kept under tight regulatory control. Mammalian PAH has a regulatory domain in which binding of the substrate leads to allosteric activation of the enzyme. However, the existence of PAH regulation in evolutionarily distant organisms, for example some bacteria in which it occurs, has so far been underappreciated. In an attempt to crystallographically characterize substrate binding by PAH from Chromobacterium violaceum, a single-domain monomeric enzyme, electron density for phenylalanine was observed at a distal site 15.7 Å from the active site. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments revealed a dissociation constant of 24 ± 1.1 μM for phenylalanine. Under the same conditions, ITC revealed no detectable binding for alanine, tyrosine, or isoleucine, indicating the distal site may be selective for phenylalanine. Point mutations of amino acid residues in the distal site that contact phenylalanine (F258A, Y155A, T254A) led to impaired binding, consistent with the presence of distal site binding in solution. Although kinetic analysis revealed that the distal site mutants suffer discernible loss of their catalytic activity, X-ray crystallographic analysis of Y155A and F258A, the two mutants with the most noticeable decrease in activity, revealed no discernible change in the structure of their active sites, suggesting that the effect of distal binding may result from protein dynamics in solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A. Ronau
- Brown Laboratory of Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN-47907, USA
| | - Lake N. Paul
- Bindley Biosciences Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Julian E. Fuchs
- Institute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80/82, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Isaac R. Corn
- Brown Laboratory of Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN-47907, USA
| | - Kyle T. Wagner
- Brown Laboratory of Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN-47907, USA
| | - Klaus R. Liedl
- Institute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80/82, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mahdi M. Abu-Omar
- Brown Laboratory of Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN-47907, USA
| | - Chittaranjan Das
- Brown Laboratory of Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN-47907, USA,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Chittaranjan Das, Brown Laboratory of Chemistry, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, (765)-494-5478, Fax: (765)-494-0239,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Nine of 212 cases of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations occurred in children with clearly open epiphyses (4.7% incidence). All cases associated with psychological or physical abnormalities were excluded. A high recurrence rate of 80% (8 of 10) was noted requiring operative intervention. Two of the three remaining unoperated cases had a history of "subluxation" after their initial dislocation.
Collapse
|