Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Celona G, Decanini L, Martino MC, Goletti O, Cavina E. Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study.
Eur J Surg 1996;
162:385-90. [PMID:
8781920]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy over open appendicectomy and to evaluate the impact of the severity of appendicitis and of peritonitis on the advantages of the laparoscopic approach.
DESIGN
Prospective unrandomised study.
SETTING
University hospital, Italy.
SUBJECTS
137 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis, 60 of whom were treated by open and 77 by laparoscopic appendicectomy. Patients were subdivided according to the severity of appendicitis and the presence of peritonitis.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Duration of operation, consumption of analgesics, duration of hospital stay, overall complications, wound infection.
RESULTS
Hospital stay (median 2.5 days, range 1-18 compared with 4, range 2-22 p < 0.0001). and wound infection (3/77 (4%) compared with 13/60 (22%), p 0.02) were significantly lower after laparoscopic operation. The incidence of wound infection was significantly lower when subgroups were analysed separately.
CONCLUSIONS
Hospital stay and wound infection rates were significantly lower after laparoscopic appendicectomy. With the exception of the wound infection rate, the variables studied may differ depending on the severity of the appendicitis and the presence of peritonitis. Result of comparative studies should be carefully interpreted when the two groups are not stratified for these features.
Collapse