Treatment persistence: a comparison among patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on atypical antipsychotic agents

BACKGROUND

Although clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotic agents in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, the likelihood of sustaining control of schizophrenic symptoms may depend on treatment persistence.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we compared treatment persistence between patients who were initiated on risperidone or olanzapine, the two most widely prescribed atypical antipsychotic agents.

METHOD

We identified patients with schizophrenia by ICD-9-CM codes (> or =1 inpatient or > or =2 outpatient ICD-9-CM codes > or =7 days apart) between 1 July 1998 and 30 June 1999. We further selected those who were prescribed the target drug during 1 April 1999 through 31 March 2000 provided that they were not on any antipsychotic agents during the prior 6 months. Using event history analysis, we compared the treatment persistence in terms of hazard ratio between olanzapine and risperidone initiators, adjusting for patient's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Following the initiation of the target drug, more patients switched from risperidone to olanzapine than vice versa. However, among patients with schizophrenia who had comorbid diabetes, there were more patients who made a switch from olanzapine to risperidone; whereas among those who used anxiolytics, there were more patients who switched from risperidone to olanzapine. Finally, olanzapine initiators had decreased hazards of discontinuation by 14% (unadjusted; P < 0.001) and 12% (adjusted; P = 0.002), respectively, than risperidone initiators.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with risperidone, olanzapine seems to be better tolerated by patients as indicated by better treatment persistence. As such, initiation of olanzapine may increase the likelihood of sustaining control of symptoms of schizophrenia. Future research needs to provide a more comprehensive assessment of treatment persistence by considering other antipsychotic agents in the study and developing models to assess treatment persistence and switching as two interdependent competing risks.

Initiation of atypical antipsychotic agents and health outcomes in patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Although pharmacological treatments are available for patients with schizophrenia, there is a lack of systematic and comprehensive evaluation of health outcomes following the initiation of atypical antipsychotic agents.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of the initiation of olanzapine or risperidone, the two most widely prescribed atypical antipsychotics, on patients' health outcomes, as measured by changes in patient clinical characteristics between 6 months prior to and post-initiation.

METHOD

We identified patients with schizophrenia by >1 inpatient or > or = 2 outpatient ICD-9-CM codes (> or = 7 days apart) between 1 July 1998 and 30 June 1999, and those who were initiated on olanzepine or risperidone during the period 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000 inclusive. We then subdivided these patients into three groups: (i) those who were not on olanzapine or risperidone, (ii) those who were not on any atypical agents, and (iii) those who were not on any antipsychotic agents, for 6 months prior to being issued with the new prescription. Using test of means or chi-square tests, we examined whether the initiation of olanzapine or risperidone is related to different changes in patient clinical indicators, such as number of drugs for psychiatric conditions, use of psychiatric services, and use of non-psychiatric services.

RESULTS

Between pre- and post-initiation, olanzapine initiators had a greater decrease in the number of psychiatric hospitalizations and use of psychotropic agents, whereas risperidone initiators had a greater reduction in the number of non-psychiatric hospitalizations. The initiation of olanzapine and risperidone appear to be associated with different patient health outcomes. Compared with olanzapine initiators, risperidone initiators had a greater increase in the use of treatments related to mental health, but had greater decrease in the use of treatments related to physical health.

CONCLUSION

Despite olanzapine and risperidone being often perceived as similar antipsychotic agents, our results suggest that the clinical outcomes associated with their use are different. Outcome data from routine clinical practice are required to provide a more comprehensive assessment of these drugs.

A placebo-controlled pilot study of the ampakine CX516 added to clozapine in schizophrenia

CX516, a positive modulator of the glutamatergic alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor, improves performance in tasks requiring learning and memory in animals. CX516 was added to clozapine in 4-week, placebo-controlled, dose-finding (N = 6) and fixed-dose (N = 13) trials. CX516 was tolerated well and was associated with moderate to large, between-group effect sizes compared with placebo, representing improvement in measures of attention and memory. These preliminary results suggest that CX516 and other "ampakines" hold promise for the treatment of schizophrenia.

How long to wait for a response to clozapine: a comparison of time course of response to clozapine and conventional antipsychotic medication in refractory schizophrenia

This study compared the time course to clinical improvement with clozapine and with conventional antipsychotic medications. A double-blind trial compared clozapine and haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia who were refractory to conventional antipsychotic medication and were hospitalized for 30 to 364 days at 15 Veteran Affairs medical centers during the year before study entry. Patients in the original study were randomly assigned to haloperidol or clozapine and followed for 12 months, at maximum tolerable doses. Patients who completed a full year of treatment with clozapine (n = 122), or with either haloperidol or another conventional antipsychotic medication (n = 123) and who also completed the 9- or 12-month assessment were included. Response to treatment was defined as 20 percent improvement on standard scales of symptoms and quality of life at the latter of the 9- or 12-month interviews. More patients assigned to clozapine achieved 20 percent improvement in symptoms at each followup. Among patients who did not improve at 6 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months, there were no significant differences between clozapine and comparison patients in outcomes at 1 year. Among patients who did improve, maintenance of that improvement also did not differ between the groups at 1 year on symptom measures. Maintenance of improvement in quality of life at 1 year was significantly greater for clozapine patients who had improved at 6 months (p < 0.04). Significant differential symptom response to clozapine occurred exclusively during the first 6 weeks of treatment.

An exploratory haloperidol-controlled dose-finding study of ziprasidone in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

Ninety patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-III-R criteria participated in this double-blind, exploratory, dose-ranging trial. After a single-blind washout period of 4 to 7 days, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four fixed doses of the new antipsychotic, ziprasidone 4 (N = 19), 10 (N = 17), 40 (N = 17), or 160 (N = 20) mg/day or haloperidol 15 mg/day (N = 17) for 4 weeks. A dose-response relationship among ziprasidone groups was established for improvements in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) score (p = 0.002) but not in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score (p = 0.08). The intent-to-treat analysis of mean changes from baseline in the BPRS total, BPRS Psychosis core, and CGI-S scores demonstrated that ziprasidone 160 mg/day was comparable with haloperidol in reducing overall psychopathology and positive symptoms and was superior to ziprasidone 4 mg/day. Despite the small sample size and short duration of the trial, the improvement in CGI-S with both ziprasidone 160 mg/day and haloperidol 15 mg/day was statistically significantly greater than with ziprasidone 4 mg/day (p = 0.001 andp = 0.005, respectively). The percentage of patients classified as responders on both the BPRS total (> or = 30% improvement) and CGI-Improvement (score of 1 or 2) scales in the ziprasidone 160 mg/day group was similar to that in the haloperidol group and nonsignificantly greater than that in the ziprasidone 4 mg/day group. On all assessments of clinical efficacy, the improvements associated with ziprasidone 4 mg/day, 10 mg/day, and 40 mg/day were similar. Concomitant benztropine use at any time during the study was less frequent with ziprasidone 160 mg/day (15%) than with haloperidol (53%). Haloperidol was associated with a sustained hyperprolactinemia, unlike ziprasidone, where only transient elevations in prolactin that returned to normal within the dosing interval were observed. Ziprasidone was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups. The results of this study suggest that ziprasidone 160 mg/day is as effective as haloperidol 15 mg/day in reducing overall psychopathology and positive symptoms of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder but has a lower potential to induce extrapyramidal symptoms.

Bright light treatment of behavioral and sleep disturbances in patients with Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE

The authors tested the hypothesis that evening bright light pulses would improve sleep-wake patterns and reduce agitation in patients with Alzheimer's disease who have severe sundowning (a syndrome of recurring confusion and increased agitation in the late afternoon or early evening) and sleep disorders.

METHOD

Ten inpatients with Alzheimer's disease on a research ward of a veterans' hospital were studied in an open clinical trial. All patients had sundowning behavior and sleep disturbances. After a week of baseline measurements, patients received 2 hours/day of exposure to bright light between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. for 1 week. During the baseline week, the treatment week, and a posttreatment week, patients were rated by nurses for agitation, sleep-wake patterns, use of restraints, and use of prescribed-as-needed medication. On the last 2 days of each week, patients wore activity monitors. Activity counts were analyzed for circadian rhythmicity.

RESULTS

Clinical ratings of sleep-wakefulness on the evening nursing shift improved with light treatment in eight of the 10 patients. The proportion of total daily activity occurring during the nighttime decreased during the light-treatment week. The relative amplitude of the circadian locomotor activity rhythm, a measure of its stability, increased during the light-treatment week. More severe sundowning at baseline predicted greater clinical improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Evening bright light pulses may ameliorate sleep-wake cycle disturbances in some patients with Alzheimer's disease. This effect may be mediated through a chronobiological mechanism.

Infection risk of cardiac catheterization and arterial angiography with single and multiple use disposable catheters

In a prospective study from November 1986 to June 1987, a cohort of 414 patients underwent cardiac catheterization or angiography with either multiple use or single use disposable catheters: 161 patients were studied with 426 single use catheters, 152 patients with 384 multiple use catheters which were resterilized once or twice, and 101 patients with 325 multiple use catheters reprocessed several times. Postcatheterization temperature did not exceed 38.2 degrees C in any patient, but was greater than 37.4 degrees C in 4-6% of the patients studied. No significant differences between the three groups with respect to fever could be observed. Infectious complications associated with cardiac catheterization or angiography did not occur in any case. Of 414 patients, 38 (9.2%) developed hematoma at the puncture site. It is concluded that careful cleaning, disinfection, and resterilization of intravascular catheters with ethylene oxide does not increase the risk of infection. With the rising pressure for containment of health care costs, it is likely that the practice of reprocessing and reuse of expensive intravascular catheters will expand further.

[Risk of infection due to catheter reuse]

Cardiac catheters assigned for reprocessing revealed only minor bacterial contamination. Random samples taken from reprocessed catheters were sterile and free from pyrogens. Among a total of 461 prospectively surveyed patients, in 16 cases a short increase of temperature up to 37.5 degrees C was observed, which appeared independent from the application of reprocessed catheters. None of the patients developed fever or symptoms of catheter-related infection.