Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread use of repeated doses of potent bone-targeting agents (BTA) in oncology patients, relatively little is known about their in vivo effects on bone homeostasis, bone quality, and bone architecture. Traditionally bone quality has been assessed using a trans-iliac bone biopsy with a 7 mm "Bordier" core needle. We examined the feasibility of using a 2 mm "Jamshidi™" core needle as a more practical and less invasive technique.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic breast cancer on BTAs were divided according to the extent of bone metastases. They were given 2 courses of tetracycline labeling and then underwent a posterior trans-iliac trephine biopsy and bone marrow aspirate. Samples were analyzed for the extent of tumor invasion and parameters of bone turnover and bone formation by histomorphometry.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were accrued, 1 had no bone metastases, 3 had limited bone metastases (LSM) (<3 lesions) and 7 had extensive bone metastases (ESM) (>3 lesions). Most of the primary tumors were estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) positive. The procedure was well tolerated. The sample quality was sufficient to analyze bone trabecular structure and bone turnover by histomorphometry in 11 out of 12 patients. There was a good correlation between imaging data and morphometric analysis of tumor invasion. Patients with no evidence or minimal bone metastases had no evidence of tumor invasion. Most had suppressed bone turnover and no detectable bone formation when treated with BTA. In contrast, 6 out of 7 patients with extensive bone invasion by imaging and evidence of tumor cells in the marrow had intense osteoclastic activity as measured by the number of osteoclasts. Of these 7 patients with ESM, 6 were treated with BTA with 5 showing resistance to BTA as demonstrated by the high number of osteoclasts present. 3 of these 6 patients had active bone formation. Based on osteoblast activity and bone formation, 3 out of 6 patients with ESM responded to BTA compared to all 3 with LSM. Compared to untreated patients, all patients treated with BTA showed a trend towards suppression of bone formation, as measured by tetracycline labelling. There was also a trend towards a significant difference between ESM and LSM treated with BTA, highly suggestive of resistance although limited by the small sample size.

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate that trans-iliac bone biopsy using a 2 mm trephine shows excellent correlation between imaging assessment of tumor invasion and tumor burden by morphometric analysis of bone tissues. In addition, our approach provides additional mechanistic information on therapeutic response to BTA supporting the current clinical understanding that the majority of patients with extensive bone involvement eventually fail to suppress bone turnover (Petrut B, et al. 2008). This suggests that antiresorptive therapies become less effective as disease progresses.

A randomized trial of individualized versus standard of care antiemetic therapy for breast cancer patients at high risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Purpose

Despite triple antiemetic therapy use for breast cancer patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy, nausea remains a clinical challenge. We evaluated adding olanzapine (5 mg) to triple therapy on nausea control in patients at high personal risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

Methods

This multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial randomized breast cancer patients scheduled to receive neo/adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide or platinum-based chemotherapy to olanzapine (5 mg, days 1–4) or placebo. Primary endpoint was frequency of self-reported significant nausea, repeated for all cycles of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included: duration of nausea, overall total control of CINV, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using FLIE questionnaire, use of rescue mediation and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

218 eligible patients were randomised to placebo (105) or olanzapine (113). From days 0–5 following each cycle of chemotherapy, 41.3% (95%CI: 36.1–46.7%) of patients in the placebo group reported significant nausea compared to 27.7% (95%CI: 23.2–32.4%) in the olanzapine group (p = 0.001). Across all cycles of chemotherapy, patients receiving olanzapine experienced a statistically significant improvement in HRQoL (p < 0.001). Grade 1/2 sedation was the most commonly side effect reported at 40.8% in the placebo group vs. 54.1% with olanzapine (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In patients at high personal risk of CINV, the addition of olanzapine 5 mg daily to standard antiemetic therapy significantly improves the control of nausea, HRQoL, with no unexpected toxicities.

•

Double-blind trial evaluated the addition of olanzapine to triple therapy in patients at high personal risk of CINV.

•

Adding 5 mg olanzapine was associated with significantly improved nausea control with no unexpected toxicities.

•

Olanzapine plus triple therapy should be considered standard of care for breast cancer patients at high risk of CINV.

A multicentre, randomised trial comparing schedules of G-CSF (filgrastim) administration for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of filgrastim as primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis in early breast cancer patients is unknown, with 5, 7 or 10 days being commonly prescribed. This trial evaluates whether 5 days of filgrastim was non-inferior to 7/10 days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomised, open-label trial, early breast cancer patients who were to receive filgrastim as primary FN prophylaxis were randomly allocated to 5 versus 7 versus 10 days of filgrastim for all chemotherapy cycles. A protocol amendment in November 2017 allowed subsequent patients (N = 324) to be randomised to either 5 or 7/10 days. The primary outcome was a composite of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisations. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy dose reductions, delays and discontinuations. Analyses were carried out by per protocol (primary) and intention-to-treat, and the non-inferiority margin was set at 3% for the risk of having FN and/or hospitalisation per cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 466) were randomised to receive 5 (184, 39.5%), or 7/10 (282, 60.5%) days of filgrastim. In our primary analysis, the difference in risk of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisation per cycle was -1.52% [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.22% to 0.19%] suggesting non-inferiority of a 5-day filgrastim schedule compared with 7/10-days. The difference in events per cycle for FN was 0.11% (95% CI: -1.05 to 1.27) while for treatment-related hospitalisations it was -1.68% (95% CI: -2.73% to -0.63%). The overall proportions of patients having at least one occurrence of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisation were 11.8% and 14.96% for the 5- and 7/10-day groups, respectively (risk difference: -3.17%, 95% CI: -9.51% to 3.18%).

CONCLUSION

Five days of filgrastim was non-inferior to 7/10 days. Given the cost and toxicity of this agent, 5 days should be considered standard of care. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT02428114 and NCT02816164.

Optimal sequence of adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer - A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Clinical equipoise exists around the optimal time to start adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients who will receive post-operative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Concerns continue to exist regarding potential reduced efficacy, or increased toxicity, when radiation, and endocrine therapy are administered concurrently.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of studies comparing outcomes between sequential and concurrent adjuvant radiation and endocrine therapy in early-stage breast cancer. All modalities of radiation therapy were considered, and endocrine therapy could be either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. Outcomes of interest included; local, regional or distant recurrence, overall survival and treatment-related toxicities.

EVIDENCE REVIEWED

PubMed, Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1946 to December 2017. Two reviewers independently assessed each citation using the criteria outlined above. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for prospective studies, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for retrospective studies.

FINDINGS

Of 2137 unique citations identified, 13 met eligibility criteria. Eleven were unique studies (7569 patients), while 2 of the studies were updated analyses of previous studies. Studies evaluated the timing of adjuvant radiation, and tamoxifen (5 studies, 1550 patients), or aromatase inhibitors (6 studies, 6019 patients). We identified 1 complete randomized clinical trial (150 patients), and 5 retrospective studies (1580 patients), in addition to conference abstracts (5 studies, 5839 patients). Overall, none of the studies showed a significant difference in efficacy, or toxicity, with concurrent versus sequential treatment. However, given the significant heterogeneity of the study populations, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In the absence of high quality data, adequately powered randomized trials are required to answer this important clinical question.

Taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast or prostate cancer: a prospective multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) is characterized by myalgias and arthralgias starting 2-3 days after taxane-based chemotherapy and lasting up to 7 days. In the absence of validated tools, many studies use the presence of both the myalgia and arthralgia components of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) to define TAPS. The present study prospectively evaluated the frequency, severity, and impact of TAPS in patients with breast or prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized study, patients with breast or prostate cancer commencing taxane-based chemotherapy completed the CTCAE (version 4.03), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-T), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaires at baseline and once between days 5 and 7 of each chemotherapy cycle.

RESULTS

From March 2015 to April 1, 2016, 75 patients (breast n = 66, prostate n = 9) were enrolled; 83% received docetaxel and 16% paclitaxel and 1% withdrew. After the first cycle of taxane, TAPS was reported by 25/69 (36.2%) patients; a further 8/69 (18.2%) reporting TAPS after a subsequent chemotherapy treatment. Overall incidence of TAPS was 33/75 (44%). While associated with detrimental scores on FACT-T and BPI as well as increased use of analgesics in 63% (21/33) of patients with TAPS, TAPS did not lead to alterations in chemotherapy dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

TAPS is common after taxane-based chemotherapy, and its presence is associated with reduced quality of life and increased analgesic requirements. Prospective patient-reported outcome assessments are crucial to help individualize treatment strategies and improve management of TAPS.

Effects on bone resorption markers of continuing pamidronate or switching to zoledronic acid in patients with high risk bone metastases from breast cancer

Background

Switching patients who remain at high risk of skeletal related events (SREs) despite pamidronate to the more potent bisphosphonate zoledronate, may be an effective treatment strategy. As part of a previously reported clinic study in this setting, we evaluated whether biomarkers for bone resorption, such as Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and N-terminal telopeptide (NTX) correlated with subsequent SRE risk.

Methods

Breast cancer patients who remained at high risk of SREs despite at least 3 months of q.3–4 weekly pamidronate were randomized to either continue on pamidronate or to switch to zoledronate (4 mg) once every 4 weeks for 12-weeks. High risk bone metastases were defined by either: occurrence of a prior SRE, bone pain, radiologic progression of bone metastases and/or serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTx) levels > 400 ng/L despite pamidronate use. Serum samples were collected at baseline and weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12 (CTx and BSAP) and baseline and week 12 (NTx and BSP), and all putative biomarkers were measured by ELISA. Follow up was extended to 2 years post trial entry for risk of subsequent SREs. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to evaluate if laboratory values over time or the change in laboratory values from baseline were associated with having a SRE within the time frame of this study.

Results

From March 2012 to May 2014, 76 patients were screened, with 73 eligible for enrolment. All 73 patients were available for biochemical analysis, with 35 patients receiving pamidronate and 38 patients receiving zoledronate. The GEE analysis found that no laboratory value was associated with having a subsequent SRE. Interaction between visit and laboratory values was also investigated, but no interaction effect was statistically significant. Only increased number of lines of prior hormonal treatment was associated with subsequent SRE risk.

Conclusion

Our analysis failed to find any association between serum BSAP, BSP, CTx or NTx levels and subsequent SRE risk in this cohort of patients. This lack of correlation between serum biomarkers and clinical outcomes could be due to influences of prior bisphosphonate treatment or presence of extra-osseous metastases in a significant proportion of enrolled patients. As such, caution should be used in biomarker interpretation and use to direct decision making regarding SRE risk for high risk patients in this setting.

A phase 2 trial exploring the clinical and correlative effects of combining doxycycline with bone-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Background

Bone-targeting agents (BTAs), such as bisphosphonates and denosumab, have demonstrated no discernable effects on tumour response or disease free/overall survival in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Doxycycline is both osteotropic and has anti-cancer effects. When combined with zoledronate in animal models, doxycycline showed significantly increased inhibition of tumour burden and increased bone formation. We evaluated the effects of adding doxycycline to ongoing anti-cancer therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

Breast cancer patients with bone metastases and ≥3 months of BTA use, entered this single-arm study. Patients received doxycycline 100 mg orally, twice a day for 12 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were; effect on validated pain scores (FACT-Bone pain and Brief Pain Inventory) and bone resorption markers (serum C-telopeptide, [sCTx]). All endpoints (pain scores, sCTx, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, skeletal-related events, toxicity) were evaluated at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Bone marrow was sampled at baseline and week 12 for exploratory biomarker analysis.

Results

Out of 37 enroled patients, 27 (73%) completed 12 weeks of therapy. No significant changes were seen in pain scores or bone turnover markers. Failure to complete treatment: drug toxicity (70%) and disease progression (30%). Sixteen (43%) patients had GI adverse events.

Conclusions

Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks had no significant effects on either bone pain or bone turnover markers. Its toxicity profile in this patient population would make further evaluation challenging.

A randomized, double-blind, phase II, exploratory trial evaluating the palliative benefit of either continuing pamidronate or switching to zoledronic acid in patients with high-risk bone metastases from breast cancer

Previous studies suggest switching from pamidronate to a more potent bone-targeted agent is associated with biomarker and palliative response in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Until now, this has not been addressed in a double-blind, randomized trial. Breast cancer patients with high-risk bone metastases, despite >3 months of pamidronate, were randomized to either continue pamidronate or switch to zoledronic acid every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a fall in serum C-telopeptide (sCTx) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included difference in mean sCTx, pain scores, quality of life, toxicity, and skeletal-related events (SREs). Seventy-three patients entered the study; median age 61 years (range 37-87). Proportion of patients achieving a fall in sCTx over the 12-week evaluation period was 26/32 (81 %) with zoledronic acid and 18/29 (62 %) with pamidronate (p = 0.095). Mean decrease in sCTx (mean difference between groups = 50 ng/L, 95 % CI 18-84; p = 0.003) was significantly greater in patients who received zoledronic acid. Quality of life, pain scores, toxicity, and frequency of new SREs were comparable between the two arms. While a switch from pamidronate to zoledronic acid resulted in reduction in mean sCTx, there were no significant differences between the arms for proportion of patients achieving a reduction in sCTx, quality of life, pain scores, toxicity or SREs. Given the lack of palliative improvement, the current data do not support a switching strategy.

Should de-escalation of bone-targeting agents be standard of care for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

De-escalation of bone-targeted agents, such as bisphosphonates and denosumab, from 4- to 12-weekly dosing is an increasingly used strategy in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. It is unclear whether there is sufficient evidence to support de-escalation as a standard of care.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized trials comparing standard 4-weekly administration of bone-targeted agents with de-escalated (Q12-weekly) dosing in breast cancer patients was carried out. Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until November 2014 for relevant studies. Outcomes of interest included skeletal-related event (SRE) rates, bone pain, adverse events (AEs) and bone turnover biomarkers. Random-effects meta-analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

A total of nine citations representing seven unique studies were eligible. One study is ongoing with no reported data. Six studies reported data for at least one outcome of interest. Data were available comparing standard versus de-escalated therapy for pamidronate (1 study, 38 patients), zoledronate (3 studies, 1117 patients) and denosumab (2 studies, 284 patients). Meta-analysis of five trials reporting data for on-study SRE rates between standard (61/443 patients) and de-escalated (49/392 patients) arms produced a summary risk ratio of 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.63-1.29). Meta-analyses of data for AEs and bone turnover biomarkers also showed no statistically significant differences between standard and de-escalated arms, though only limited numbers of patients and events were present for most analyses.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review of studies of bisphosphonates and denosumab, there appears to be no difference in SREs or pain with de-escalated therapy. While a large, hopefully definitive study is ongoing, the data presented so far are consistent with de-escalation of bone-targeting agents becoming a standard of care for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer.

Prospective validation of risk prediction indexes for acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of standardized anti-emetic guidelines, up to 20% of cancer patients suffer from moderate-to-severe chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (cinv)-that is, grade 2 or greater according to the U.S. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. We previously developed cycle-based prediction models and associated scoring systems for acute and delayed cinv. As part of the validation process, we prospectively evaluated the ability of the scoring systems to accurately identify patients deemed to be high risk for grade 2 or greater cinv.

METHODS

Patients who were receiving any chemotherapy for solid tumours and who consented to participate were provided with symptom diaries. Compliance to the diaries was enhanced by 24-hour and 5-day telephone callbacks after chemotherapy in every cycle. All patients received anti-emetic prophylaxis as prescribed by the treating physician. Before each cycle of chemotherapy, the acute and delayed cinv scoring systems were used to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups. Logistic regression modelling was then applied to compare the risk for grade 2 or greater cinv between patients considered to be at high and at low risk. The external validity of each system was also assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auroc) analysis.

RESULTS

We collected cinv outcomes data from 95 patients during 181 cycles of chemotherapy. The incidence of grade 2 or greater acute and delayed cinv was 17.7% and 18.2% respectively. As previously identified, major predictors for grade 2 or greater cinv included younger patient age, platinum- or anthracycline-based chemotherapy, low alcohol consumption, earlier cycles of chemotherapy, previous history of morning sickness, and prior emetic episodes after chemotherapy. The acute and delayed scoring systems both had good predictive accuracy when applied to the external validation sample (acute-auroc: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.79; delayed-auroc: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 0.80). Patients identified by the scoring systems to be at high risk were 2.8 (p = 0.025) and 3.1 (p = 0.001) times more likely to develop grade 2 or greater acute and delayed cinv.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that our scoring systems are able to accurately identify patients at high risk for acute and delayed cinv. Application and planned continued refinement of the scoring systems will be an important means of patient-specific risk assessment that will allow for optimization of anti-emetic therapy.

Abstract P2-05-13: Correlation of conventional versus experimental biomarkers of bone turnover and metastasis behaviour with skeletal related events – A biomarker analysis in conjunction with the TRIUMPH study

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable variability in patient (pt) risk of skeletal related events (SREs) from bone metastases (BM), all pts are treated using a one size fits all approach, namely the same dose and dosing schedule (q3-4 wk) of IV bisphosphonate (BP). Identification of novel markers of individual SRE risk are thus required to better tailor treatment. TRIUMPH is an ongoing clinical trial evaluating q12 wk IV BP therapy for 1 year, following &gt;3 months of standard q3-4 wk BP, in women with low risk bone metastases [defined by the bone resorption marker C-telopeptide (CTx) levels &lt;600 ng/L]. This sub-study evaluated the utility of novel biomarkers in better predicting SRE risk in this low-risk cohort.

METHODS: Seventy-one pts enrolled in TRIUMPH. Pt serum at baseline (69), 6 (67) and 12 (59) wks post-entry were analyzed for CTx and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) as per study protocol. Urine N-telopeptide (NTx) levels and serum levels of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), activinA, procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and bone sialoprotein (BSP) levels were also assessed by ELISA (for n=63, 63 and 57 patients at baseline, wk 6 and wk 12 respectively). Biomarker levels were correlated with pt parameters including; time to development of BM, previous SREs, and SREs post-study entry using linear regression analysis. Changes in levels of biomarkers from baseline to 6 or 12 weeks were used to calculate odds ratios of coming off study as per protocol (due to either CTx&gt;600 ng/ml or SRE) or of SRE alone using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Although baseline CTx and NTx were elevated in pts who went on to develop SREs, this did not reach statistical significance. Baseline activinA trended towards total number of prior SREs (p = 0.07). Baseline TGF-β correlated with duration of BM (p = 0.004). Change in activinA (baseline to week 6) was the only biomarker that trended to predict coming off study early (p = 0.043). Results of other baseline biomarkers and changes in biomarkers from baseline to wk 12 will also be presented.

CONCLUSIONS: This study further questions the role of CTx and NTx for driving treatment decisions around de-intensification of BP therapy (Coleman et al. J Clin Oncol 2012, suppl; abstr 511), and highlights the need for novel markers of SRE risk. Baseline levels of activinA was associated with the incidence of SREs in patients with BM and changes in levels from baseline to 6 weeks correlated with coming off study early. These findings warrant future studies in breast cancer pts assessing activinA as a predictor of SRE risk associated with breast cancer bone metastases.

This study was supported by grants from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research with funding from the Government of Ontario, and from the Ontario Chapter of the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-13.

Abstract P3-13-05: Evaluating efficacy of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients at low-risk of skeletal related events. TRIUMPH: A pragmatic multicentre trial

Background: Optimal bisphosphonate (BP) dosing intervals for breast cancer patients (pts) with bone metastases (BM) remain unknown. BP are usually prescribed q3-4 wk regardless of individual pt risk for skeletal related events (SREs). Recent evidence (Amadori J Clin Oncol, 2012 suppl; abstr 9005) shows that q12 wk BP is as effective as q4 wk in pts previously treated with &gt;9 cycles of q4 wk therapy. Hence, further evaluation of modified BP dosing strategies is warranted. The objective of the current study was to show in women with biochemically defined low-risk bone disease that IV BP use every q12 wk for 1 year is sufficient to maintain stability of the bone turnover [measured by serum c-telopeptide (CTx) or bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP)].

Methods: Eligible pts with BM, who had received &gt;3 months of q3-4 wk IV BP and no systemic treatment change within 4 wks of study entry were enrolled. Low risk was defined as serum CTx &lt;600 ng/L. Biochemical failure was defined as CTx levels &gt;600 ng/L at baseline, weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 or 48. Evaluation of palliative benefit of 12-wk IV BP therapy was measured by SREs, analgesic use, and self-reported pain (BPI and FACT-BP).

Results: Between Oct. 2010-Sept. 2011, 85 pts consented to screening, with 13 found ineligible. In the 71 accrued pts baseline characteristics were: mean age 60 (SD 13), median time from breast cancer diagnosis to development of bone metastases 4 months (IQR 82), median duration of prior BP therapy 14 months (IQR 19), and mean number of SREs/yr prior to entering study 0.35 (SD 0.76). Baseline median CTx was 120 ng/L (IQR 240) and BSAP 9.2 IU/L (IQR 3). To date: 26/71 pts (36%) remain on study. Reasons for coming off study include; study completion (18), elevation of CTx &gt;600ng/L (10), or on study SRE (3). An elevation of CTx between baseline and wk 6 was significantly associated with coming off study early (p = 0.008). For pts who had had an SRE before study entry the odds ratios for coming off study early due to an on study SRE or elevated CTx was 1.005 (CI 1.002–1.009; p = 0.007) and for coming off early for an SRE was 0.0245 (CI 0.061–0.094; p = 0.046) respectively. Of the 8/13 pts who were ineligible due to baseline CTx &gt;600ng/L, 6 had an SRE within 1 year of screening.

Conclusion: De-escalating BP therapy to 12 weekly in low risk pts has advantages for both the pt and the health care system. Individual risk of SREs is highly variable, however baseline serum CTx levels &lt;600 ng/L is associated with a low risk of subsequent SREs. While larger trials are required to assess whether increasing CTx with de-escalated therapy will lead to higher rates of SREs or not (Coleman et al. J Clin Oncol 2012 suppl; abstr 511). However, the results of this study and Amadori et al. would suggest that de-escalated BP treatment will likely become a new standard of care after a limited period of q 4wk treatment.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-05.

Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analyses using the 2 mm bone marrow trephine in metastatic breast cancer patients-preliminary results

Background

Bone-targeted agents are widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis, the prevention of cancer-therapy induced bone loss, and for reducing the risk of skeletal related events in patients with metastatic disease. Despite widespread use, relatively little is known about the in vivo effect of these agents on bone homeostasis, bone quality, and bone architecture in humans. Traditionally bone quality has been assessed using a transiliac bone biopsy with a 7 mm “Bordier” core needle. We examined the possibility of using a 2 mm “Jamshidi” core needle as a more practical and less invasive method to assess bone turnover and potentially other tumor effects.

Methods

A pilot study on the feasibility of assessing bone quality and microarchitecture and tumor invasion using a 2 mm bone marrow trephine was conducted. Patients underwent a posterior trans-iliac trephine biopsy and bone marrow aspirate. Samples were analyzed for bone microarchitecture, bone density, and histomorphometry. The study plan was to accrue three patients with advanced breast cancer to assess the feasibility of the study before enrolling more patients.

Results

The procedure was well tolerated. The sample quality was excellent to analyze bone trabecular microarchitecture using both microCT and histomorphometry. Intense osteoclastic activity was observed in a patient with extensive tumor burden in bone despite intravenous bisphosphonate therapy.

Discussion

Given the success of this study for assessing bone microarchitecture, bone density, and histomorphometry assessment using a 2 mm needle the study will be expanded beyond these initial three patients for longitudinal assessment of bone-targeted therapy.

Excision of the primary tumour in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a clinical dilemma

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10% of new breast cancer patients will present with overt synchronous metastatic disease. The optimal local management of those patients is controversial. Several series suggest that removal of the primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, but the retrospective nature of those studies raises considerable methodologic challenges. We evaluated our clinical experience with the management of such patients and, more specifically, the impact of surgery in patients with synchronous metastasis.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with primary breast cancer and concurrent distant metastases seen at our centre between 2005 and 2007. Demographic and treatment data were collected. Study endpoints included overall survival and symptomatic local progression rates.

RESULTS

The 111 patients identified had a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 0.6-71 months). We allocated the patients to one ot two groups: a nonsurgical group (those who did not have breast surgery, n = 63) and a surgical group (those who did have surgery, n = 48, 29 of whom had surgery before the metastatic diagnosis). When compared with patients in the nonsurgical group, patients in the surgical group were less likely to present with T4 tumours (23% vs. 35%), N3 nodal disease (8% vs. 19%), and visceral metastasis (67% vs. 73%). Patients in the surgical group experienced longer overall survival (49 months vs. 33 months, p = 0.01) and lower rates of symptomatic local progression (14% vs. 44%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, improved overall survival and symptomatic local control were demonstrated in the surgically treated patients; however, this group had less aggressive disease at presentation. The optimal local management of patients with metastatic breast cancer remains unknown. An ongoing phase iii trial, E2108, has been designed to assess the effect of breast surgery in metastatic patients responding to first-line systemic therapy. If excision of the primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, then the preselected subgroup of patients who have responded to initial systemic therapy is the desired population in which to put this hypothesis to the test.

Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf) as primary prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia has significant cost implications. We examined use of g-csf for early-stage breast cancer patients at our centre. The study also examined the pattern of nurse-led patient teaching with respect to drug self-administration.

METHODS

Patients who received g-csf between November 2009 and October 2010 were identified from pharmacy records. After consent had been obtained, electronic charts were examined to extract data on chemotherapy and use of g-csf. Patients were contacted by telephone to obtain information on the utilization of home-care nursing visits for g-csf administration.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 36 patients. Median age was 58 years (range: 31-78 years). Of the 36 patients, 30 (83%) had received adjuvant treatment, and 6 (17%), neoadjuvant treatment. Most patients (71%) received 10 days (range: 7-10 days) of filgrastim. Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) received g-csf as primary prophylaxis. In 90% of those patients, primary prophylaxis commenced with the taxane component of treatment. Of the 36 patients, 7 (19%) received g-csf after neutropenia, including 2 who had febrile neutropenia. In 96% of the patients, injections were received at home with the help of a nurse; those patients were subsequently taught self-injection techniques. The median number of nursing visits was 2 (range: 1-3 visits). Most patients were satisfied with the home care and g-csf teaching they received.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the g-csf used in breast cancer treatment during the study period was given for primary prophylaxis. A major reason for the decision to use g-csf appears to have been physician-perceived risk of febrile neutropenia. Delivery of g-csf by home-care nurses was well received by patients.

P2-15-05: Excision of the Primary Tumour in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer – Will E2108 Provide the Definitive Answer?

Background: Approximately 10% of new breast cancer patients will present with overt synchronous metastatic disease. Controversy exists about the optimal local management of these patients. While several series suggest that removal of primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, the retrospective nature of these studies raises considerable methodological challenges. We decided to evaluate the experience at our centre around the impact of surgery in patients with synchronous metastasis.

Method: Case records of all patients seen with primary breast cancer and concurrent distant metastases between 2005 to 2007 were reviewed. Demographic and treatment data was collected. The study endpoints compared both overall survival and symptomatic local progression rates between patients who had breast surgery and those who did not.

RESULTS: 111 patients were identified. Median follow-up 40 months (0.6-71 months). Patients were divided into two groups: those patients who underwent breast surgery (n=48; 29/48 had surgery immediate prior to metastatic diagnosis) and those that did not have surgery(n = 63). The surgical group were less likely to present with T4 tumours (20% vs 36%), N3 nodal disease (8% vs 19%) and visceral metastasis (67% vs 73%)when compared with non-surgical group. Improved overall survival (49 months vs 33 months; p=0.01) and less symptomatic local progression rates ( 15% vs 43%, p &lt; 0.001 ) were seen in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical group.

CONCLUSIONS: The optimal local management of patients with metastatic breast cancer is unknown. Despite the surgery group demonstrating an improved overall survival and symptomatic local control, this group had less aggressive disease at presentation. These results confirm the need for prospective randomized studies. E2108, an ongoing Phase III Trial, was designed to assess the effect of breast surgery in metastatic patients responding to first line systemic therapy. If excision of the primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, then the pre-selected subgroup of patients that have responded to initial systemic therapy is the desired population to put this hypothesis to test.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-15-05.

OT1-01-02: A Multicentre Study Assessing 12-Weekly Intravenous Bisphosphonate Therapy in Women with Low Risk Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer – The TRIUMPH Trial

Background: Metastatic bone disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for breast cancer patients. Bisphosphonates (BP) have been shown to significantly delay the onset and frequency of skeletal related events (SREs), improve pain control and overall quality of life. Most patients receive intravenous BP every 3–4 weeks regardless of their individual risk for a SRE. This “one size fits all” strategy could expose those patients at a relatively low risk of SREs to an increased chance of adverse drug effects, as well as to the financial and quality of life burden of multiple visits to the cancer centre for treatments. This study aimed to assess whether IV BP can be safely given at reduced frequency.

Methods: The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate in women with biochemically defined low-risk bone metastases that the administration of IV BP every 12 weeks is sufficient to maintain biochemical stability for one year. Eligibility criteria include; bone metastases from breast cancer, have received at least three months of regular 3–4 weekly IV BP, satisfactory renal function, adequate dental health, no systemic treatment change or recent SRE within 4 weeks of study entry. Low risk disease will be defined as serum CTx levels &lt;600 ng/L Biochemical failure is defined as CTx levels &gt;600 ng/L measured at predefined time points (6, 12, 24, 36 and 48th). Secondary objectives are to evaluate the palliative benefit of 12-weekly IV BP therapy as reflected by occurrence of SREs, analgesic use, self-reported pain using the validated BP and FACT-BP questionnaires. Sample size was calculated at 68 patients. Given the small sample size, nonparametric Bootstrapping will be employed to calculate point estimates, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). An exploratory multivariable analysis will also be undertaken to determine baseline factors that were associated with patient's maintaining their telopeptide levels in the low risk range. Conclusion: TRIUMPH opened in October 2010 and as of June 2011, has quickly accrued 54/68 patients (79%). This trial has the potential to allow lower risk women to receive less frequent dosing of bisphosphonates, thus improving their quality of life with less cancer center visits and reducing their chance of drug induced adverse events.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-02.

Changing demographics of locally advanced breast cancer: Data from a regional cancer centre

10780

Background: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) (including inflammatory breast cancer (IBC)) accounts for less than 5% of women diagnosed with breast cancer in North America each year. This population of women continues to represent a challenge in terms of timely diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A retrospective database was developed using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)2002 staging classification for all women who presented to TOHRCC with LABC between Jan 1/02 - April 1/05. Information was abstracted from clinic charts and the patient self-reported health questionnaires. Results: These results reflect the demographics of the first 50 women entered into our database. Median age at presentation was 57 years (range 28–88); 62% were post-menopausal and 28% had a 1st/2nd degree relative with breast cancer. Clinical diagnosis was made by: self-detection (79%); mammography (5%), routine physical exam (9%) and CT scan (2%). Clinical tumour stage at presentation was: IIIA (25.6%); IIIB (53.5%) and IIIC (9.3%). The majority of women were diagnosed with infiltrating ductal carcinoma (72%). Women with T4d tumours (IBC) (38%) tended to be younger (54.5 vs 59.2 years); presented earlier (2.7 vs. 6.3 months); had larger tumours at the time of diagnosis (9.7 vs 5.5 cm); were more likely grade III (30 vs 20%) and were more often ER negative (42.1% vs 33.3%) and PR negative (63.2% vs. 50%). Only 13% of women in this database were tested for HER-2 of whom 70% were positive. Conclusions: This data utilizing the new AJCC (2002) staging system reflects important shifts in LABC that will influence clinical care in the future. Compared to historical databases, patients tended to be younger and have more aggressive disease including ER negative and HER-2 positive disease. Supplemental microarray studies to further explore this entity are planned. We will present clinical management outcomes in an additional submission.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Trends in systemic management (SM) for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: Data from a regional cancer centre

10728

Background: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) accounts for less than 5% of women diagnosed with breast cancer in North America each year. The scarcity of clinical trials addressing the SM of these women continues to represent a challenge for clinicians. Methods: A retrospective database was developed using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 2002 staging classification for all women who presented to TOHRCC with LABC between Jan 1/02-April 1/05. Information was obtained from clinic charts and patient self-reported questionnaires. Results: Outcomes reflect the SM of the first 50 women entered into our database. Median age at presentation was 57 years (range 28–88); 62% were post-menopausal; and hormonal status was 52% estrogen receptor (ER) positive and 54% progesterone receptor (PR) positive. Surgery was performed prior to chemotherapy in 50% of patients (pts).The majority (90%) of pts received SM as follows: 38% anthracyclines (A) alone (52% epirubicin, 26% adriamycin, 2% both); 7% taxanes (T) alone (33% paclitaxel, 66% docetaxel), 53% received both T and A regimens, and 2% received other types of chemotherapy (gemcitabine,vinorelbine,capecitabine). The addition of trastuzumab to the SM of HER2-positive pts has also been observed. Hormone therapy was given to 22 pts (44%) of whom 82% were ER or PR-positive: tamoxifen (27%); aromatase inhibitors (AIs; 50%); both tamoxifen and AIs (23%). Pts were treated with AIs as follows: anastrozole (73%); fulvestrant (9%), and atemestane (9%). In pts with measurable disease receiving neoadjuvant SM; 7(35%) had a complete clinical response and 13 (65%) had a partial response; mean tumour size decreased from 7.5 cm (range 2–22) to 2.8 cm (range 0–8). Pathological complete response rates and improved survival rates have been observed and will be reported in detail. Conclusions: These results represent our first analysis of treatment outcomes in women with LABC using the new AJCC system. This database highlights the increased utilization of T and AIs in the SM of these pts, which seems to translate into the increasingly observed improvements in overall survival. Microarray studies to further explore predictability of treatment outcomes are planned.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.