1
|
Tabernero J, Velez L, Trevino TL, Grothey A, Yaeger R, Van Cutsem E, Wasan H, Desai J, Ciardiello F, Yoshino T, Gollerkeri A, Maharry K, Christy-Bittel J, Kopetz S. Management of adverse events from the treatment of encorafenib plus cetuximab for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: insights from the BEACON CRC study. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100328. [PMID: 34896698 PMCID: PMC8666642 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year relative survival of 14% in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients with BRAF V600E mutations, which occur in ∼10%-15% of patients with mCRC, have a poorer prognosis compared with those with wild-type BRAF tumours. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab currently represents the only chemotherapy-free targeted therapy approved in the USA and Europe for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. As a class, BRAF inhibitors are associated with dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and renal events, as well as pyrexia and secondary skin malignancies. Adverse event (AE) profiles of specific BRAF inhibitors vary, however, and are affected by the specific agents given in combination. In patients with mCRC, commonly reported AEs of cetuximab monotherapy include infusion reactions and dermatologic toxicities. Data from the phase III BEACON CRC study indicate that the combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has a distinct safety profile. Here we review the most frequently reported AEs that occurred with this combination in BEACON CRC and best practices for managing and mitigating AEs that require more than standard supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), UVIC-UCC, IOB-Quiron, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - L Velez
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), UVIC-UCC, IOB-Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T L Trevino
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - A Grothey
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, OneOncology, Germantown, USA
| | - R Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology Department, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Desai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Walter and Aliza Hall Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - F Ciardiello
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania, Naples, Italy
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | | | | | | - S Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Benestan L, Fietz K, Loiseau N, Guerin PE, Trofimenko E, Rühs S, Schmidt C, Rath W, Biastoch A, Pérez-Ruzafa A, Baixauli P, Forcada A, Arcas E, Lenfant P, Mallol S, Goñi R, Velez L, Höppner M, Kininmonth S, Mouillot D, Puebla O, Manel S. Restricted dispersal in a sea of gene flow. Proc Biol Sci 2021; 288:20210458. [PMID: 34004134 PMCID: PMC8131118 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
How far do marine larvae disperse in the ocean? Decades of population genetic studies have revealed generally low levels of genetic structure at large spatial scales (hundreds of kilometres). Yet this result, typically based on discrete sampling designs, does not necessarily imply extensive dispersal. Here, we adopt a continuous sampling strategy along 950 km of coast in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea to address this question in four species. In line with expectations, we observe weak genetic structure at a large spatial scale. Nevertheless, our continuous sampling strategy uncovers a pattern of isolation by distance at small spatial scales (few tens of kilometres) in two species. Individual-based simulations indicate that this signal is an expected signature of restricted dispersal. At the other extreme of the connectivity spectrum, two pairs of individuals that are closely related genetically were found more than 290 km apart, indicating long-distance dispersal. Such a combination of restricted dispersal with rare long-distance dispersal events is supported by a high-resolution biophysical model of larval dispersal in the study area, and we posit that it may be common in marine species. Our results bridge population genetic studies with direct dispersal studies and have implications for the design of marine reserve networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Benestan
- CEFE, PSL EPHE, Université Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| | - K. Fietz
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - N. Loiseau
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - P. E. Guerin
- CEFE, PSL EPHE, Université Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| | - E. Trofimenko
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - S. Rühs
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - C. Schmidt
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - W. Rath
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - A. Biastoch
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
- Kiel University, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany
| | - A. Pérez-Ruzafa
- Department of Ecology and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology, Espinardo, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Mare Nostrum’, University of Murcia, Murcia 30100, Spain
| | - P. Baixauli
- Department of Ecology and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology, Espinardo, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Mare Nostrum’, University of Murcia, Murcia 30100, Spain
| | - A. Forcada
- Department of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante, P.O. Box 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain
| | - E. Arcas
- Department of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante, P.O. Box 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain
| | - P. Lenfant
- Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, Université Perpignan Via Domitia, CNRS, 66100 Perpignan, France
| | - S. Mallol
- Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Moll de Ponent s/n, 07015 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - R. Goñi
- Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Moll de Ponent s/n, 07015 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - L. Velez
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - M. Höppner
- Kiel University, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany
| | - S. Kininmonth
- School of Marine Studies, University of the South Pacific, Fiji
| | - D. Mouillot
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - O. Puebla
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
- Ecology Department, Leibniz-Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Fahrenheitstraße 6, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - S. Manel
- CEFE, PSL EPHE, Université Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify clinical characteristics related to poor glycemic control in patients with NIDDM cared for by Michigan primary care physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study was a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from 393 NIDDM patients (mean age, 63 +/- 11 years; 54% female; 92% white) in the 1990-1991 Michigan Diabetes in Communities II Study. We evaluated patient demographic, clinical, and physiological characteristics, attitudes toward diabetes, and self-care ability. Logistic regression was used for multivariate evaluation of the characteristics of those patients whose glycosylated hemoglobin (normal GHb 4-8%) was in the upper 25% of the study sample (GHb > 11.6%). RESULTS A high meal-stimulated plasma C-peptide was associated with a lower likelihood of poor control (odds ratio [OR] for highest quartile vs. all others = 0.37; 95% CI 0.23-0.58). Longer time since diagnosis (OR for each 5 years duration = 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.53), poor self-care ability (OR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.27-2.71), and perceived absence of dietary recommendations (OR = 2.37; 95% CI 1.11-5.08) were also independently associated with presence in the highest GHb quartile. Characteristics that were not significantly related to poor glycemic control included sex, age, obesity, educational level, exercise, self-rated health status, and pharmacological treatment. CONCLUSIONS 1) Poor glycemic control may reflect progressive failure of islet function, although the independent relationships of C-peptide level and time since diagnosis are consistent with concepts of heterogeneous mechanisms underlying NIDDM. 2) Despite the important relationships of biological characteristics of NIDDM to glycemic control, patient attitudes and self-care ability may be useful targets for designing management strategies for certain poorly controlled patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Blaum
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|