1
|
Pereira J, Klinger C, Seow H, Marshall D, Herx L. Are We Consulting, Sharing Care, or Taking Over? A Conceptual Framework. Palliat Med Rep 2024; 5:104-115. [PMID: 38415077 PMCID: PMC10898231 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Primary- and specialist-level palliative care services are needed. They should work collaboratively and synergistically. Although several service models have been described, these remain open to different interpretations and deployment. Aim This article describes a conceptual framework, the Consultation-Shared Care-Takeover (C-S-T) Framework, its evolution and its applications. Design An iterative process informed the development of the Framework. This included a symposium, literature searches, results from three studies, and real-life applications. Results The C-S-T Framework represents a spectrum anchored by the Consultation model at one end, the Takeover model at the other end, and the Shared Care model in the center. Indicators, divided into five domains, help differentiate one model from the other. The domains are (1) Scope (What aspects of care are addressed by the palliative care clinician?); (2) Prescriber (Who prescribes the treatments?); (3) Communication (What communication occurs between the palliative care clinician and the patient's attending clinician?); (4) Follow-up (Who provides the follow-up visits and what is their frequency?); and (5) Most responsible practitioner (MRP) (Who is identified as MRP?). Each model demonstrates strengths, limitations, uses, and roles. Conclusions The C-S-T Framework can be used to better describe, understand, assess, and monitor models being used by specialist palliative care teams in their interactions with primary care providers and other specialist services. Large studies are needed to test the application of the Framework on a broader scale in health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Pereira
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
- Pallium Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Klinger
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Pallium Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denise Marshall
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zimmermann C, Pope A, Hannon B, Bedard PL, Rodin G, Dhani N, Li M, Herx L, Krzyzanowska MK, Howell D, Knox JJ, Leighl NB, Sridhar S, Oza AM, Lheureux S, Booth CM, Liu G, Castro JA, Swami N, Sue-A-Quan R, Rydall A, Le LW. Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP) versus usual care for patients with advanced cancer: a mixed methods study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:404. [PMID: 37341839 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07870-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although early palliative care is recommended, resource limitations prevent its routine implementation. We report on the preliminary findings of a mixed methods study involving a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP) and qualitative interviews. METHODS Adults with advanced solid tumors and an oncologist-estimated prognosis of 6-36 months were randomized to STEP or symptom screening alone. STEP involved symptom screening at each outpatient oncology visit; moderate to severe scores triggered an email to a palliative care nurse, who offered referral to in-person outpatient palliative care. Patient-reported outcomes of quality of life (FACT-G7; primary outcome), depression (PHQ-9), symptom control (ESAS-r-CS), and satisfaction with care (FAMCARE P-16) were measured at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of participants. RESULTS From Aug/2019 to Mar/2020 (trial halted due to COVID-19 pandemic), 69 participants were randomized to STEP (n = 33) or usual care (n = 36). At 6 months, 45% of STEP arm patients and 17% of screening alone participants had received palliative care (p = 0.009). Nonsignificant differences for all outcomes favored STEP: difference in change scores for FACT-G7 = 1.67 (95% CI: -1.43, 4.77); ESAS-r-CS = -5.51 (-14.29, 3.27); FAMCARE P-16 = 4.10 (-0.31, 8.51); PHQ-9 = -2.41 (-5.02, 0.20). Sixteen patients completed qualitative interviews, describing symptom screening as helpful to initiate communication; triggered referral as initially jarring but ultimately beneficial; and referral to palliative care as timely. CONCLUSION Despite lack of power for this halted trial, preliminary results favored STEP and qualitative results demonstrated acceptability. Findings will inform an RCT of combined in-person and virtual STEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Ashley Pope
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Breffni Hannon
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gary Rodin
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neesha Dhani
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Madeline Li
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer J Knox
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Srikala Sridhar
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Medical Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Alcalde Castro
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nadia Swami
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rachel Sue-A-Quan
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anne Rydall
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa W Le
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Belayneh M, Fainsinger R, Nekolaichuk C, Muller V, Bouchard S, Downar J, Galloway L, Ghosh S, Hawley P, Herx L, Kmet A, Lawlor P. Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: Comparison of Pain Classification Features and Pain Intensity across Diverse Palliative Care Settings in Canada. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:366-375. [PMID: 36282783 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The goal of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) is to create an international classification system for cancer pain. Previous studies reinforce the need for standardized training to ensure consistency across assessors. There is no universally accepted classification for neuropathic pain. Objectives: Our primary objective was to describe the prevalence of ECS-CP features in a diverse sample of advanced cancer patients, using assessors with standardized training. The secondary objectives were to: (1) determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain using the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG) criteria and (2) examine the relationship between specific predictors: ECS-CP features, age, Palliative Performance Scale, Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD), setting, and pain intensity; and neuropathic pain. Methods: A total of 1050 adult patients with advanced cancer were recruited from 11 Canadian sites. A clinician completed the ECS-CP and NeuPSIG criteria, and collected additional information including demographics and pain intensity (now). All assessors received standardized training. Results: Of 1050 evaluable patients, 910 (87%) had cancer pain: nociceptive (n = 626; 68.8%); neuropathic (n = 227; 24.9%); incident (n = 329; 36.2%); psychological distress (n = 209; 23%); addictive behavior (n = 51; 5.6%); and normal cognition (n = 639; 70.2%). The frequencies of ECS-CP features and pain intensity scores varied across sites and settings, with more acute settings having higher frequencies of complex pain features. The overall frequency of neuropathic pain was 24.9%, ranging from 11% (hospices) to 34.2% (palliative outpatient clinic) across settings. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age <60 years, MEDD ≥19 mg, pain intensity ≥7/10, and incident pain were significant independent predictors of neuropathic pain (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The ECS-CP was able to detect salient pain features across settings. Furthermore, the frequencies of neuropathic pain utilizing the NeuPSIG criteria fits within the lower-end of literature estimates (13%-40%). Further research is warranted to validate the NeuPSIG criteria in cancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieos Belayneh
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robin Fainsinger
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl Nekolaichuk
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Viki Muller
- Covenant Health, Palliative Institute, Network of Excellence in Seniors' Health and Wellness (NESHW), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sylvie Bouchard
- Department of Oncology, Montreal Institute for Palliative Care/Teresa Dellar Palliative Care Residence, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - James Downar
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lyle Galloway
- Division of Palliative Care, Departments of Oncology and Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pippa Hawley
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander Kmet
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada
| | - Peter Lawlor
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zimmermann C, Pope A, Hannon B, Krzyzanowska MK, Rodin G, Li M, Howell D, Knox JJ, Leighl NB, Sridhar S, Oza AM, Prince R, Lheureux S, Hansen AR, Rydall A, Chow B, Herx L, Booth CM, Dudgeon D, Dhani N, Liu G, Bedard PL, Mathews J, Swami N, Le LW. Phase II Trial of Symptom Screening With Targeted Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 20:361-370.e3. [PMID: 34492632 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine early palliative care (EPC) improves quality of life (QoL) for patients with advanced cancer, but it may not be necessary for all patients. We assessed the feasibility of Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP) in a phase II trial. METHODS Patients with advanced cancer were recruited from medical oncology clinics. Symptoms were screened at each visit using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r); moderate to severe scores (screen-positive) triggered an email to a palliative care nurse, who called the patient and offered EPC. Patient-reported outcomes of QoL, depression, symptom control, and satisfaction with care were measured at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary aim was to determine feasibility, according to predefined criteria. Secondary aims were to assess whether STEP identified patients with worse patient-reported outcomes and whether screen-positive patients who accepted and received EPC had better outcomes over time than those who did not receive EPC. RESULTS In total, 116 patients were enrolled, of which 89 (77%) completed screening for ≥70% of visits. Of the 70 screen-positive patients, 39 (56%) received EPC during the 6-month study and 4 (6%) received EPC after the study end. Measure completion was 76% at 2 months, 68% at 4 months, and 63% at 6 months. Among screen-negative patients, QoL, depression, and symptom control were substantially better than for screen-positive patients at baseline (all P<.0001) and remained stable over time. Among screen-positive patients, mood and symptom control improved over time for those who accepted and received EPC and worsened for those who did not receive EPC (P<.01 for trend over time), with no difference in QoL or satisfaction with care. CONCLUSIONS STEP is feasible in ambulatory patients with advanced cancer and distinguishes between patients who remain stable without EPC and those who benefit from targeted EPC. Acceptance of the triggered EPC visit should be encouraged. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04044040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Zimmermann
- 1Department of Supportive Care, and.,2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,4Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.,5Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | | | - Breffni Hannon
- 1Department of Supportive Care, and.,2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,4Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Gary Rodin
- 1Department of Supportive Care, and.,2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,5Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - Madeline Li
- 1Department of Supportive Care, and.,2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,5Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - Doris Howell
- 1Department of Supportive Care, and.,2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,7Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - Jennifer J Knox
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Natasha B Leighl
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Srikala Sridhar
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Amit M Oza
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Rebecca Prince
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | | | | | - Leonie Herx
- 8Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston
| | - Christopher M Booth
- 9Division of Medical Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston.,10Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston.,11Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston; and
| | - Deborah Dudgeon
- 9Division of Medical Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston
| | - Neesha Dhani
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- 2Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.,3Division of Medical Oncology.,6Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - Jean Mathews
- 1Department of Supportive Care, and.,4Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
| | | | - Lisa W Le
- 12Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Striving to be faithful to the moral core of medicine and to spiritual, moral, and social teaching of the church, Catholic physicians see their role as an extension of the healing ministry of Jesus. When faced with a situation in which a large number of gravely ill people are seeking care, but optimal treatment such as ventilation in intensive care unit cannot be offered to all because of scarcity of resources, Catholic physicians recognize the need to consider the common good and to assign a priority to patients for whom such treatments would be most probably lifesaving. Making these evaluations, physicians will use only objective medical criteria regarding the benefits and risks to patients and will be mindful that all persons deserve equal respect for their dignity. Discrimination or prejudicial treatment against patients based on factors such as age, disability, race, gender, quality of life, and possible long-term survival cannot be morally justified. Triage process should incorporate respect for autonomy of both the patient and the professional and opportunity for an appeal of a triage decision. Other principles and values that will affect how a triage protocol is developed and applied are proportionality, equity, reciprocity, solidarity, subsidiarity, and transparency. The current coronavirus pandemic can provide valuable lessons and stimulus for reforms and renewal. SUMMARY Catholic physicians strive to continue the healing ministry of Jesus Christ and be faithful to the moral core of medicine. In situations such as pandemic, the scarcity of personnel and technological resources create serious challenges and even moral distress. Church teachings on dignity, the common good and protection of the vulnerable help guide decisions based on public medical criteria and shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuala Kenny
- Bioethics and Pediatrics, Ringgold Standard Institution, Dalhousie
University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jaro Kotalik
- Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Ringgold Standard Institution, Lakehead
University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Medicine, Ringgold Standard Institution, Queen’s
University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Rene Leiva
- Faculty of Medicine, Ringgold Standard Institution, University of
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Henderson JD, Boyle A, Herx L, Alexiadis A, Barwich D, Connidis S, Lysecki D, Sinnarajah A. Staffing a Specialist Palliative Care Service, a Team-Based Approach: Expert Consensus White Paper. J Palliat Med 2019; 22:1318-1323. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John David Henderson
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Anne Boyle
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Department of Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aleco Alexiadis
- Department of Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Doris Barwich
- Department of Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephanie Connidis
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - David Lysecki
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feldstain A, Bultz BD, de Groot J, Abdul-Razzak A, Herx L, Galloway L, Chary S, Sinnarajah A. Outcomes From a Patient-Centered, Interprofessional, Palliative Consult Team in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 16:719-726. [PMID: 29891523 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Palliative care aims to improve suffering and quality of life for patients with life-limiting disease. This study evaluated an interdisciplinary palliative consultation team for outpatients with advanced cancer at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre. This team traditionally offered palliative medicine and recently integrated a specialized psychosocial clinician. Historic patient-reported clinical outcomes were reviewed. There were no a priori hypotheses. Methods: A total of 180 chart reviews were performed in 8 sample months in 2015 and 2016; 114 patients were included. All patients were referred for management of complex cancer symptomatology by oncology or palliative care clinicians. Patients attended initial interviews in person; palliative medicine follow-ups were largely performed by telephone, and psychosocial appointments were conducted in person for those who were interested and had psychosocial concerns. Chart review included collection of demographics, medical information, and screening for distress measures at referral, initial consult, and discharge. Results: A total of 51% of the patient sample were men, 81% were living with a partner, and 87% had an advanced cancer diagnosis. Patients were grouped based on high, moderate, or low scores for 5 symptoms (pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and well-being). High scores on all 5 symptoms decreased from referral to discharge. Pain and anxiety decreased in the moderate group. All 5 low scores increased significantly. Sleep, frustration/anger, sense of burdening others, and sensitivity to cold were less frequently endorsed by discharge. Conclusions: Patients who completed this interdisciplinary palliative consult service appeared to experience a reduction in their most severe symptoms. Visits to patients during existing appointments or having them attend a half-day clinic appears to have reached those referred. With interdisciplinary integration, clinicians are able to collaborate to address patient care needs. Considerations include how to further integrate palliative and psychosocial care to achieve additional benefits and ongoing monitoring of changes in symptom burden.
Collapse
|
8
|
Trussler A, Alexander B, Campbell D, Alhammad N, Enriquez A, Chacko S, Garrett T, Simpson C, Redfearn D, Abdollah H, Herx L, Baranchuk A. Deactivation of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Terminal Diagnoses. Am J Cardiol 2019; 124:1064-1068. [PMID: 31353003 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death. However, in patients with terminal illnesses, these devices may disrupt the dying process. This study was undertaken to review our current strategies surrounding device deactivation. A retrospective chart review was performed at Kingston Health Sciences Centre of patients with an ICD who died from 2015 to 2018. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical details surrounding device implantation, patient co-morbidities leading to deactivation, time to deactivation, physical place of deactivation, and device programming information. Ethics approval was obtained from the Queen's University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board. A total of 49 patients were included for analysis. Mean age at the time of death was 77.5 years (range: 57 to 94 years) and 12.2% (6/49) were women. The indications for ICD implantation were primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in 69.4% (34/49) and secondary prevention in 30.6% (15/49). Deactivation as part of end-of-life care was performed in 32.7% of patients (16/49). Deactivations occurred in clinic in 6.1% (3/49) of patients, on hospital inpatient wards in 12.2% (6/49) of patients, and in critical care settings in 14.2% (7/49) of patients. The remaining 67.3% (33/49) of patients died with fully functioning devices in place. The most prevalent terminal diagnoses were metastatic cancer (22.4%) and end-stage congestive heart failure (20.4%). On average, patients had their devices deactivated 13 months (range: 0 to 62 months) after their terminal diagnosis was established. Once a patient was documented as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), deactivation was discussed and carried out within a mean time of 38 days (range: 0 to 400 days). Seven patients had their device active for more than 1 month after being documented as DNR. Ten patients (20.4%) received ICD shocks after their terminal diagnosis, 9 received shocks in the month before death, and 2 received shocks after formal DNR orders were in place. Approximately one-third of patients with ICDs received deactivation of their cardioversion/defibrillation therapies as part of their end-of-life care plan. A relatively high proportion of patients (20%) received an ICD shock in the last month of life. In conclusion, addressing device programming needs, including deactivation of cardioversion/defibrillation therapies, should be considered in the context of a patient's goals of care in every patient with an ICD who has a co-existing life-limiting diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Trussler
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bryce Alexander
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Debra Campbell
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nasser Alhammad
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrés Enriquez
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sanoj Chacko
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy Garrett
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chris Simpson
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Damian Redfearn
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hoshiar Abdollah
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adrian Baranchuk
- Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herx L. Opioid Wisely. CMAJ 2019; 191:E263. [DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.71591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
10
|
Pilkey J, Downar J, Dudgeon D, Herx L, Oneschuk D, Schroder C, Schulz V. Palliative Medicine-Becoming a Subspecialty of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. J Palliat Care 2017; 32:113-120. [PMID: 29129136 DOI: 10.1177/0825859717741027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The discipline of palliative medicine in Canada started in 1975 with the coining of the term "palliative care." Shortly thereafter, the provision of clinical palliative medicine services started, although the education of the discipline lagged behind. In 1993, the Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians (CSPCP) started to explore the option of creating an accredited training program in palliative medicine. This article outlines the process by which, over the course of 20 years, palliative medicine training in Canada went from a mission statement of the CSPCP, to a 1 year of added competence jointly accredited by both the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (Royal College) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada, to a 2-year subspecialty of the Royal College with access from multiple entry routes and a formalized accrediting examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Pilkey
- 1 Section of Palliative Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,2 Palliative Care Program, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, St Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - James Downar
- 3 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah Dudgeon
- 4 Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- 5 Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,6 Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,7 Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,8 Palliative and End of Life Care, Alberta Health Services, Calgary Zone, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Doreen Oneschuk
- 9 Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cori Schroder
- 10 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Working Group in Palliative Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie Schulz
- 11 Department Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Slawnych
- Division of Cardiology, Libin Cardiovascular Institute (Slawnych); Departments of Paediatrics (Herx) and Oncology (Simon, Chary), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Leonie Herx
- Division of Cardiology, Libin Cardiovascular Institute (Slawnych); Departments of Paediatrics (Herx) and Oncology (Simon, Chary), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Jessica Simon
- Division of Cardiology, Libin Cardiovascular Institute (Slawnych); Departments of Paediatrics (Herx) and Oncology (Simon, Chary), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Srini Chary
- Division of Cardiology, Libin Cardiovascular Institute (Slawnych); Departments of Paediatrics (Herx) and Oncology (Simon, Chary), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Myers J, Krueger P, Webster F, Downar J, Herx L, Jeney C, Oneschuk D, Schroder C, Sirianni G, Seccareccia D, Tucker T, Taniguchi A. Development and Validation of a Set of Palliative Medicine Entrustable Professional Activities: Findings from a Mixed Methods Study. J Palliat Med 2015; 18:682-90. [PMID: 26061030 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are routine tasks considered essential to a professional practice. An EPA can serve as a performance-based outcome that a clinical supervisor would progressively entrust a learner to perform. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to identify, develop, and validate a set of EPAs for the palliative medicine discipline. METHODS The design was a sequential qualitative and quantitative mixed methods study. A working group was convened to develop a set of EPAs. Focus groups and surveys were used for validation purposes. Palliative medicine educators and content experts from across Canada participated in both the working group as well as the focus groups. Attendees of the 2014 Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians (CSPCP) annual conference completed surveys. A questionnaire was used to collect survey participant sociodemographic, clinical, and academic information along with ratings of the importance of the EPAs individually and collectively. Cronbach's alpha examined internal consistency of the set of EPAs. RESULTS Focus group participants strongly endorsed the 12 EPAs. Virtually all survey participants rated the individual EPAs as being "fairly/very important" (range 94% to 100%). Of the participants, 97% agreed that residents able to perform the set of EPAs would be practicing palliative medicine and 87% indicated strong agreement that this collective set of EPAs captures activities that all palliative medicine physicians must be able to perform. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.841 confirmed good internal consistency. CONCLUSIONS Near uniform agreement from a national group of palliative medicine physicians provides strong validation for the set of 12 EPAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff Myers
- 1 Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto , Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Krueger
- 2 Department of Family Medicine, University of Toronto , Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Webster
- 2 Department of Family Medicine, University of Toronto , Ontario, Canada
| | - James Downar
- 1 Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto , Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- 3 University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christa Jeney
- 1 Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto , Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Giovanna Sirianni
- 1 Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto , Ontario, Canada
| | - Dori Seccareccia
- 1 Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto , Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Tucker
- 6 University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
On February 6, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada made a unanimous decision that it is unconstitutional to prohibit physician-assisted death [...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Herx
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marshall GB, Heale VR, Herx L, Abdeen A, Mrkonjic L, Powell J, Sevick RJ, Morrish W. Magnetic Resonance Diffusion W Imaging in Cerebral Fat Embolism. Can J Neurol Sci 2014; 31:417-21. [PMID: 15376492 DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100003565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The use of diffusion weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the diagnosis of cerebral fat embolism is shown here to demonstrate infarcts secondary to fat emboli more intensely than T2 weighted sequences 24 hours after the onset of symptoms. Embolic foci are hypointense on apparent diffusion coefficient mapping consistent with cytotoxic edema associated with cell death and restricted water diffusion. This technique increases the sensitivity for detecting cerebral fat embolism and offers a potentially important tool in its diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G B Marshall
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Larson B, Herx L, Williamson T, Crowshoe L. Beyond the barriers: family medicine residents' attitudes towards providing Aboriginal health care. Med Educ 2011; 45:400-406. [PMID: 21401688 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03892.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Health care is one of many under-resourced areas in Aboriginal communities in Canada. Aboriginal people have substandard health compared with the general population, yet have less access to health care services. Not only is there a paucity of Aboriginal doctors, but it also appears that few non-Aboriginal doctors are willing or able to work in Aboriginal contexts. OBJECTIVES This study examines the attitudes of family medicine residents towards providing health care to Aboriginal patients. The goal of this study was to assess the willingness of family medicine residents to work in Aboriginal health care and to elucidate the major factors that inform these attitudes. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of an urban cohort of family medicine residents using a convenience sample. Our survey instrument consisted of a questionnaire comprising a mixture of open-ended and closed questions. RESULTS Although a majority (52%, n = 27) of the family medicine residents were willing to work in Aboriginal contexts, many felt underprepared to do so (40%, n = 21). Residents who have had some exposure to Aboriginal issues and have had community experiences are more likely to state an intention to work in Aboriginal settings. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study encourage the creation of educational experiences for medical residents that may promote a desire to work in Aboriginal communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Larson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|