1
|
Mahoney EJ, Bugaev N, Appelbaum R, Goldenberg-Sandau A, Baltazar GA, Posluszny J, Dultz L, Kartiko S, Kasotakis G, Como J, Klein E. Response to letter to the editor regarding article: Management of the open abdomen: A systematic review with meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95:e62-e63. [PMID: 37683253 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
|
2
|
Bhogadi SK, Alizai Q, Colosimo C, Spencer AL, Stewart C, Nelson A, Ditillo M, Castanon L, Magnotti LJ, Joseph B, Dultz L, Black G, Campbell M, Berndtson AE, Costantini T, Kerwin A, Skarupa D, Burruss S, Delgado L, Gomez M, Mederos DR, Winfield R, Cullinane D, Hosseinpour H. Not all traumatic brain injury patients on preinjury anticoagulation are the same. Am J Surg 2023; 226:785-789. [PMID: 37301645 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic significance of different anticoagulants in TBI patients remains unanswered. We aimed to compare effects of different anticoagulants on outcomes of TBI patients. METHODS A secondary analysis of AAST BIG MIT. Blunt TBI patients ≥50 years using anticoagulants presenting ICH were identified. Outcomes were progression of ICH and need for neurosurgical intervention (NSI). RESULTS 393 patients were identified. Mean age was 74 and most common anticoagulant was aspirin (30%), followed by Plavix (28%), and coumadin (20%). 20% had progression of ICH and 10% underwent NSI. On multivariate regression for ICH progression, warfarin, SDH, IPH, SAH, alcohol intoxication and neurologic exam deterioration were associated with increased odds. Warfarin, abnormal neurologic exam on presentation, and SDH were independent predictors of NSI. CONCLUSIONS Our findings reflect a dynamic interaction between type of anticoagulants, bleeding pattern & outcomes. Future modifications of BIG may need to take the type of anticoagulant into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Krishna Bhogadi
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Qaidar Alizai
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Christina Colosimo
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Audrey L Spencer
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Collin Stewart
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Adam Nelson
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Michael Ditillo
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Lourdes Castanon
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Louis J Magnotti
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Bellal Joseph
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Linda Dultz
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - George Black
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Marc Campbell
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Allison E Berndtson
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Todd Costantini
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Andrew Kerwin
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - David Skarupa
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Sigrid Burruss
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Lauren Delgado
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Mario Gomez
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Dalier R Mederos
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Robert Winfield
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel Cullinane
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Hamidreza Hosseinpour
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teichman AL, Bonne S, Rattan R, Dultz L, Qurashi FA, Goldenberg A, Polite N, Liveris A, Freeman JJ, Colosimo C, Chang E, Choron RL, Edwards C, Arabian S, Haines KL, Joseph D, Murphy PB, Schramm AT, Jung HS, Lawson E, Fox K, Mashbari HNA, Smith RN. Screening and intervention for intimate partner violence at trauma centers and emergency departments: an evidence-based systematic review from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2023; 8:e001041. [PMID: 36967863 PMCID: PMC10030790 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-001041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health issue with a substantial burden on society. Screening and intervention practices vary widely and there are no standard guidelines. Our objective was to review research on current practices for IPV prevention in emergency departments and trauma centers in the USA and provide evidenced-based recommendations.MethodsAn evidence-based systematic review of the literature was conducted to address screening and intervention for IPV in adult trauma and emergency department patients. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology was used to determine the quality of evidence. Studies were included if they addressed our prespecified population, intervention, control, and outcomes questions. Case reports, editorials, and abstracts were excluded from review.ResultsSeven studies met inclusion criteria. All seven were centered around screening for IPV; none addressed interventions when abuse was identified. Screening instruments varied across studies. Although it is unclear if one tool is more accurate than others, significantly more victims were identified when screening protocols were implemented compared with non-standardized approaches to identifying IPV victims.ConclusionOverall, there were very limited data addressing the topic of IPV screening and intervention in emergency medical settings, and the quality of the evidence was low. With likely low risk and a significant potential benefit, we conditionally recommend implementation of a screening protocol to identify victims of IPV in adults treated in the emergency department and trauma centers. Although the purpose of screening would ultimately be to provide resources for victims, no studies that assessed distinct interventions met our inclusion criteria. Therefore, we cannot make specific recommendations related to IPV interventions.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020219517.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L Teichman
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Stephanie Bonne
- Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Hackensack Meridian Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Rishi Rattan
- Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Linda Dultz
- Burns, Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Anna Goldenberg
- Trauma, Acute Care Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Cooper University Hospital Regional Trauma Center, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nathan Polite
- Trauma, Acute Care Surgery & Burns, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Anna Liveris
- Trauma and Critical Care Services, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer J Freeman
- General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, TCU School of Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Christina Colosimo
- Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, & Acute Care Surgery, University of Arizona Medical Center-University Campus, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Erin Chang
- Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Rachel L Choron
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Courtney Edwards
- Burns, Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Sandra Arabian
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Krista L Haines
- Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - D'Andrea Joseph
- Surgery, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Patrick B Murphy
- Trauma & Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Andrew T Schramm
- Trauma & Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Hee Soo Jung
- Acute Care Surgery and Regional General Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Emily Lawson
- Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, Emory University Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kathleen Fox
- Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, Emory University Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Randi N Smith
- Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahoney EJ, Bugaev N, Appelbaum R, Goldenberg-Sandau A, Baltazar GA, Posluszny J, Dultz L, Kartiko S, Kasotakis G, Como J, Klein E. Management of the open abdomen: A systematic review with meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 93:e110-e118. [PMID: 35546420 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple techniques describe the management of the open abdomen (OA) and restoration of abdominal wall integrity after damage-control laparotomy (DCL). It is unclear which operative technique provides the best method of achieving primary myofascial closure at the index hospitalization. METHODS A writing group from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature regarding OA management strategies in the adult population after DCL. The group sought to understand if fascial traction techniques or techniques to reduce visceral edema improved the outcomes in these patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was utilized, meta-analyses were performed, and an evidence profile was generated. RESULTS Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, the use of fascial traction techniques was associated with improved primary myofascial closure during the index admission (relative risk, 0.32) and fewer hernias (relative risk, 0.11.) The use of fascial traction techniques did not increase the risk of enterocutaneous fistula formation nor mortality. Techniques to reduce visceral edema may improve the rate of closure; however, these studies were very limited and suffered significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSION We conditionally recommend the use of a fascial traction system over routine care when treating a patient with an OA after DCL. This recommendation is based on the benefit of improved primary myofascial closure without worsening mortality or enterocutaneous fistula formation. We are unable to make any recommendations regarding techniques to reduce visceral edema. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Mahoney
- From the Tufts Medical Center (E.J.M, N.B.), Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts; Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (R.A.) Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Cooper University Hospital (A.G.-S.), Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Camden, New Jersey; NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island (G.A.B.), Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mineola, New York; Northwestern Memorial Hospital (J.P.), Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Chicago, Illinois; University of Texas Southwestern (L.D.), Division of Burn, Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dallas, Texas; The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences (S.K.), Center of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Washington, District of Columbia; Duke University Medical Center (G.K.), Division of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Durham, North Carolina; MetroHealth Medical Center (J.C.), Cleveland, Ohio; and Northwell Health-North Shore University Hospital (E.K.) Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Great Neck, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Joseph B, Obaid O, Dultz L, Black G, Campbell M, Berndtson AE, Costantini T, Kerwin A, Skarupa D, Burruss S, Delgado L, Gomez M, Mederos DR, Winfield R, Cullinane D. Validating the Brain Injury Guidelines: Results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma prospective multi-institutional trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 93:157-165. [PMID: 35343931 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) was developed to effectively use health care resources including repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) scan and neurosurgical consultation in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate BIG at a multi-institutional level. METHODS This is a prospective, observational, multi-institutional trial across nine Levels I and II trauma centers. Adult (16 years or older) blunt TBI patients with a positive initial head computed tomography (CT) scan were identified and categorized into BIG 1, 2, and 3 based on their neurologic examination, alcohol intoxication, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, and head CT scan findings. The primary outcome was neurosurgical intervention. The secondary outcomes were neurologic worsening, RHCT progression, postdischarge emergency department visit, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS A total of 2,432 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 2,033 had no missing information and were categorized into BIG 1 (301 [14.8%]), BIG 2 (295 [14.5%]), and BIG 3 (1,437 [70.7%]). In BIG 1, no patient worsened clinically, 4 of 301 patients (1.3%) had progression on RHCT with no change in management, and none required neurosurgical intervention. In BIG 2, 2 of 295 patients (0.7%) worsened clinically, and 21 of 295 patients (7.1%) had progression on RHCT. Overall, 7 of 295 patients (2.4%) would have required upgrade from BIG 2 to 3 because of neurologic examination worsening or progression on RHCT, but no patient required neurosurgical intervention. There were no TBI-related postdischarge emergency department visits or 30-day readmissions in BIG 1 and 2 patients. All patients who required neurosurgical intervention were BIG 3 (280 of 1,437 patients [19.5%]). Agreement between assigned and final BIG categories was excellent ( κ = 99%). In this cohort, implementing BIG would have decreased CT scan utilization and neurosurgical consultation by 29% overall, with a 100% reduction in BIG 1 patients and a 98% reduction in BIG 2 patients. CONCLUSION Brain Injury Guidelines is safe and defines the management of TBI patients by trauma and acute care surgeons without the routine need for RHCT and neurosurgical consultation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bellal Joseph
- From the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery (B.J., O.O., M.C., T.A., A.N.), College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Division of General and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (L.D., G.B., S.K.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Division of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.C.), Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (A.E.B., T.C.), University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, California; Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Division, Department of Surgery (A.K.), The University of Tennessee Health Science Centerm Memphis, Tennessee; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (D.S.), College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida; Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (S.B., L.D., X.L.-O.), Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California; Department of Surgery (M.G., D.R.M.), Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Trauma/Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery (R.W.), School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas; and Department of Surgery (D.C.), Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aicher BO, Betancourt-Ramirez A, Grossman MD, Heise H, Schroeppel TJ, Hernandez MC, Zielinski MD, Kongkaewpaisan N, Kaafarani HMA, Wagner A, Grabo D, Scott M, Peck G, Chang G, Matsushima K, Cullinane DC, Cullinane LM, Stocker B, Posluszny J, Simonoski UJ, Catalano RD, Vasileiou G, Yeh DD, Agrawal V, Truitt MS, Pickett M, Dultz L, Muller A, Ong AW, San Roman JL, Barth N, Fackelmayer O, Velopulos CG, Hendrix C, Estroff JM, Gambhir S, Nahmias J, Jeyamurugan K, Bugaev N, O'Meara L, Kufera J, Diaz JJ, Bruns BR. Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Emergency General Surgery Grading System for Colorectal Resection: An EAST Multicenter Study. Am Surg 2022; 88:953-958. [PMID: 35275764 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820960022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) has developed a grading system for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions. We sought to validate the AAST EGS grades for patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection. METHODS Patients enrolled in the "Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Colorectal Resection in EGS-to anastomose or not to anastomose" study undergoing urgent/emergent surgery for obstruction, ischemia, or diverticulitis were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidity severity as defined by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), procedure type, and AAST grade were prospectively collected. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in-hospital mortality, and surgical complications (superficial/deep/organ-space surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, stoma complication, fascial dehiscence, and need for further intervention). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to describe outcomes and risk factors for surgical complication or mortality. RESULTS There were 367 patients, with a mean (± SD) age of 62 ± 15 years. 39% were women. The median interquartile range (IQR) CCI was 4 (2-6). Overall, the pathologies encompassed the following AAST EGS grades: I (17, 5%), II (54, 15%), III (115, 31%), IV (95, 26%), and V (86, 23%). Management included laparoscopic (24, 7%), open (319, 87%), and laparoscopy converted to laparotomy (24, 6%). Higher AAST grade was associated with laparotomy (P = .01). The median LOS was 13 days (8-22). At least 1 surgical complication occurred in 33% of patients and the mortality rate was 14%. Development of at least 1 surgical complication, need for unplanned intervention, mortality, and increased LOS were associated with increasing AAST severity grade. On multivariable analysis, factors predictive of in-hospital mortality included AAST organ grade, CCI, and preoperative vasopressor use (odds ratio (OR) 1.9, 1.6, 3.1, respectively). The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery grade was also associated with the development of at least 1 surgical complication (OR 2.5), while CCI, preoperative vasopressor use, respiratory failure, and pneumoperitoneum were not. CONCLUSION The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery grading systems display construct validity for mortality and surgical complications after urgent/emergent colorectal resection. These results support incorporation of AAST EGS grades for quality benchmarking and surgical outcomes research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany O Aicher
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Michael D Grossman
- Department of Surgery, Southside Hospital, Northwell Health, Bay Shore, Bay Shore, NY
| | - Holly Heise
- Department of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central Trauma Center, Colorado Springs, Colorado
| | - Thomas J Schroeppel
- Department of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central Trauma Center, Colorado Springs, Colorado
| | | | | | - Napaporn Kongkaewpaisan
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Haytham M A Kaafarani
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Afton Wagner
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Daniel Grabo
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Michael Scott
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Gregory Peck
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Gloria Chang
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kazuhide Matsushima
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - Benjamin Stocker
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joseph Posluszny
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ursula J Simonoski
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Richard D Catalano
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Georgia Vasileiou
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Ryder Trauma Center/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Daniel Dante Yeh
- Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Ryder Trauma Center/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Vaidehi Agrawal
- Department of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michael S Truitt
- Department of Surgery, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - MaryAnne Pickett
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas
| | - Linda Dultz
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas
| | - Alison Muller
- Department of Surgery, Reading Hospital, West Reading, Pennsylvania
| | - Adrian W Ong
- Department of Surgery, Reading Hospital, West Reading, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sahil Gambhir
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Jeffry Nahmias
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | | | - Nikolay Bugaev
- Department of Surgery, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lindsay O'Meara
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph Kufera
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jose J Diaz
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brandon R Bruns
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Biffl WL, Ball CG, Moore EE, Lees J, Todd SR, Wydo S, Privette A, Weaver JL, Koenig SM, Meagher A, Dultz L, Udekwu PO, Harrell K, Chen AK, Callcut R, Kornblith L, Jurkovich GJ, Castelo M, Schaffer KB. Don't mess with the pancreas! A multicenter analysis of the management of low-grade pancreatic injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91:820-828. [PMID: 34039927 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current guidelines recommend nonoperative management (NOM) of low-grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale Grade I-II) pancreatic injuries (LGPIs), and drainage rather than resection for those undergoing operative management, but they are based on low-quality evidence. The purpose of this study was to review the contemporary management and outcomes of LGPIs and identify risk factors for morbidity. METHODS Multicenter retrospective review of diagnosis, management, and outcomes of adult pancreatic injuries from 2010 to 2018. The primary outcome was pancreas-related complications (PRCs). Predictors of PRCs were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Twenty-nine centers submitted data on 728 patients with LGPI (76% men; mean age, 38 years; 37% penetrating; 51% Grade I; median Injury Severity Score, 24). Among 24-hour survivors, definitive management was NOM in 31%, surgical drainage alone in 54%, resection in 10%, and pancreatic debridement or suturing in 5%. The incidence of PRCs was 21% overall and was 42% after resection, 26% after drainage, and 4% after NOM. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for PRC were other intra-abdominal injury (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.16-15.28), low volume (OR, 2.88; 1.65, 5.06), and penetrating injury (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.80-6.58). Resection was very close to significance (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.97-4.34) (p = 0.0584). CONCLUSION The incidence of PRCs is significant after LGPIs. Patients who undergo pancreatic resection have PRC rates equivalent to patients resected for high-grade pancreatic injuries. Those who underwent surgical drainage had slightly lower PRC rate, but only 4% of those who underwent NOM had PRCs. In patients with LGPIs, resection should be avoided. The NOM strategy should be used whenever possible and studied prospectively, particularly in penetrating trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Study, level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter L Biffl
- From the Scripps Memorial Hospital (W.L.B., M.C., K.B.S.), La Jolla, La Jolla, CA; University of Calgary, Calgary (C.G.B.), Alberta, Canada; Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health (E.E.M.), Denver, CO; University of Oklahoma (J.L.), Oklahoma City, OK; Grady Memorial Hospital (S.R.T.), Atlanta, GA; Cooper University Hospital (SW), Camden, NJ; Medical University of South Carolina (A.P.), Charleston, SC; University of California-San Diego (J.L.W.), San Diego, CA; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (S.M.K.), Carilion Clinic, Roanoke VA; Indiana University School of Medicine- Methodist (A.M.), Indianapolis, IN; Parkland- UT Southwestern Medical Center (L.D.), Dallas, TX; WakeMed Health (P.O.U.), Raleigh, NC; University of Tennessee College of Medicine (K.H.), Chattanooga, TN; UCSF Fresno (A.K.C.), Fresno, CA; and San Francisco General Hospital (R.C., L.K.), San Francisco, CA; University of California-Davis (G.J.J.), Sacramento, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel NJ, Dultz L, Ladhani HA, Cullinane DC, Klein E, McNickle AG, Bugaev N, Fraser DR, Kartiko S, Dodgion C, Pappas PA, Kim D, Cantrell S, Como JJ, Kasotakis G. Management of simple and retained hemothorax: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Am J Surg 2021; 221:873-884. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Mehta A, Efron DT, Canner JK, Manukyan MC, Dultz L, Burns C, Stevens K, Sakran JV. Surgeon variation in operating times and charges for emergency general surgery. J Surg Res 2018; 227:101-111. [PMID: 29804841 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients and hospitals face significant financial burdens from emergency general surgeries (EGSs), which have been termed a public health crisis in the United States. We evaluated hospitalization charges, operating charges, and variations in operating time by surgeon volume for three common EGS procedures. METHODS Using Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission database, we performed a retrospective study of laparoscopic appendectomies, laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and open bowel resections performed by general surgeons among adult patients from July 2012 to September 2014. We compared operating charges to total hospitalization charges and quantified variations in operating time for each procedure. We then divided patients into quartiles based on their surgeon's procedure-specific case volume and used hierarchical linear regressions to calculate differences in both operating time and charges between quartiles. RESULTS We identified 3194 appendectomies, 4143 cholecystectomies, and 1478 bowel resections. Operating charges accounted for one-quarter (26.9%) of total hospitalization charges and widespread variation existed in operating time (appendectomies: median 79 min [interquartile range 66-100 min], cholecystectomies: 96 min [76-125 min], bowel resections: 155 min [117-209 min]). After adjustment, low-volume surgeons relative to high-volume surgeons did not operate statistically longer for appendectomies (+1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2% to 5%) but operated +16% (95% CI: 12%-20%) longer for cholecystectomies (+14 min) and +40% (95% CI: 30%-50%) longer for bowel resections (+59 min). Adjusted median operating charges from low-volume surgeons relative to high-volume surgeons were $554 (26.7%), $621 (22.0%), and $1801 (47.0%) greater for appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and bowel resections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Operating charges contributed substantially to total EGS hospitalization charges, where low-volume surgeons operated longer and had higher operative charges relative to high-volume surgeons. Reducing variations in operating times and charges represents an opportunity to alleviate the financial burden from EGS procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambar Mehta
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David T Efron
- Johns Hopkins Department of Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Linda Dultz
- Johns Hopkins Department of Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Kent Stevens
- Johns Hopkins Department of Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zagzag J, Pollack A, Dultz L, Dhar S, Ogilvie JB, Heller KS, Deng FM, Patel KN. Clinical utility of immunohistochemistry for the detection of the BRAF v600e mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 2013; 154:1199-204; discussion 1204-5. [PMID: 23931769 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2013] [Accepted: 06/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRAF V600E mutation is the most common genetic alteration in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). We used a mutation-specific antibody for immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of the BRAF V600E mutation and correlated expression with clinicopathologic features. The study was designed to validate the accuracy and determine the clinical importance of IHC detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in PTC. METHODS Direct sequencing and IHC for BRAF V600E mutation was performed in 37 consecutive patients with PTCs. IHC was scored on an intensity proportion scale. IHC positive tumors were stratified into intensity categories. The categories were assessed for clinicopathologic variables, including age, extrathyroidal extension, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastases. RESULTS A total of 25 PTCs were BRAF V600E-positive and 12 were BRAF mutation-negative on IHC. The BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 100% for detecting the mutation. Tumors with high-intensity staining were more likely to have extrathyroidal extension. CONCLUSION IHC is an accurate method for the detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in PTC, and its ability to quantify the mutation expression may serve as a better predictor of tumor behavior than molecular sequencing. It provides a potentially rapid, easily applicable, and economic alternative to current techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Zagzag
- Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pace R, Dultz L, Ogilvie J, Heller K, Patel K. Chronic Thyroiditis May Contribute to the Development of Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Cancer. J Surg Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.10.814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
12
|
Gupta S, Ajise O, Dultz L, Wang B, Nonaka D, Ogilvie J, Heller KS, Patel KN. Follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer: encapsulated, nonencapsulated, and diffuse: distinct biologic and clinical entities. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 138:227-33. [PMID: 22431868 DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2011.1466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine genotypic and clinical differences between encapsulated, nonencapsulated, and diffuse follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC, NFVPTC, and diffuse FVPTC, respectively), to characterize the entities and identify predictors of their behavior. DESIGN Retrospective medical chart review and molecular analysis. SETTING Referral center of a university hospital. PATIENTS The pathologic characteristics of 484 consecutive patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent surgery by the 3 members of the New York University Endocrine Surgery Associates from January 1, 2007, to August 1, 2010, were reviewed. Forty-five patients with FVPTC and in whom at least 1 central compartment lymph node was removed were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patients with FVPTC were compared in terms of age, sex, tumor size, encapsulation, extrathyroid extension, vascular invasion, central nodal metastases, and the presence or absence of mutations in BRAF, H-RAS 12/13, K-RAS 12/13, N-RAS 12/13, H-RAS 61, K-RAS 61, N-RAS 61, and RET/PTC1. RESULTS No patient with EFVPTC had central lymph node metastasis, and in this group, 1 patient (4.5%) had a BRAF V600E mutation and 2 patients (9%) had RAS mutations. Of the patients with NFVPTC, none had central lymph node metastasis (P > .99) and 2 (11%) had a BRAF V600E mutation (P = .59). Of the patients with diffuse FVPTC, all had central lymph node metastasis (P < .001), and 2 (50%) had a BRAF V600E mutation (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS FVPTC consists of several distinct subtypes. Diffuse FVPTC seems to present and behave in a more aggressive fashion. It has a higher rate of central nodal metastasis and BRAF V600E mutation in comparison with EFVPTC and NFVPTC. Both EFVPTC and NFVPTC behave in a similar fashion. The diffuse infiltrative pattern and not just presence or absence of encapsulation seems to determine the tumor phenotype. Understanding the different subtypes of FVPTC will help guide appropriate treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Gupta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|