A Case of Local Radiation Injury in the Creation of Lichtenburg Art

Despite the fact that there may be no immediate outward signs of tissue destruction, the ultimate damage caused by radiation exposure is immediate and may be predicted based on the source, length of exposure, and type of tissue to which the radiation is exposed. Although predictable, difficulty in caring for these patients stems from the multiple sources of radiation to which people may be exposed, the various parts of the body exposed, the dose involved, the rarity of the condition, and a general lack of knowledge on the part of treating physicians. Due to these factors, there is significant variation in treatment recommendations. Additionally, knowledge about how to treat these injuries is limited and often very difficult to access, even among healthcare professionals. This report highlights the first known case of localized radiation injury secondary to the utilization of a linear accelerator to generate Lichtenberg art. In this case, an accident occurred while working with a retired accelerator and led to severe local radiation injury to this patient's bilateral hands, prompting a series of searches and inquiries as to the next best step in management. From consulting clinicians at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who are experts in managing radiation injury to the eventual need for digit amputation, this case highlights the profound lack of knowledge and accessible resources for clinicians and patients facing localized radiation injury. This is a noninterventional observation case report without the requirement of ethical approval.

The effect of marijuana use on short-term outcomes with bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing marijuana use nationwide, there are limited data on implications of marijuana use on bariatric surgery outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated associations between marijuana use and bariatric surgery outcomes.

SETTING

Multicenter statewide study utilizing data from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, a payor-funded consortium including over 40 hospitals and 80 surgeons performing bariatric surgery statewide.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative clinical registry on patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between June 2019 and June 2020. Patients were surveyed at baseline and annually on medication use, depression symptoms, and substance use. Regression analysis was performed to compare 30-day and 1-year outcomes between marijuana users and nonusers.

RESULTS

Of 6879 patients, 574 reported baseline marijuana use and 139 reported use at baseline and 1 year. Marijuana users were more likely to be current smokers (14% versus 8%, P < .0001), screen positive for alcohol use disorder (20.0% versus 8.4%, P < .0001), and score higher on the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (6.1 versus 3.0, P < .0001). There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day outcomes or co-morbidity remission at 1 year. Marijuana users had higher adjusted total mean weight loss (47.6 versus 38.1 kg, P < .0001) and body mass index reduction (17 versus 14 kg/m2, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Marijuana use is not associated with worse 30-day outcomes or 1-year weight loss outcomes and should not be a barrier to bariatric surgery. However, marijuana use is associated with higher rates of smoking, substance use, and depression. These patients may benefit from additional mental health and substance abuse counseling.

The Role of Surgery in Oligometastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are extremely rare, comprising <15% of primary sarcomas. Distant metastasis occurs in about 20% of cases, with pulmonary and hepatic metastasis as the most common sites of hematogenous spread. Although surgical resection is well established as the main treatment of localized primary disease, there are limited guidelines for the surgical treatment of intra-abdominal and distant metastases. There are inadequate systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic sarcoma, thereby necessitating the consideration of surgical options in carefully selected patients. Key points to consider include tumor biology, patient fitness and co-morbidities, overall prognosis, and goals of care. Multidisciplinary sarcoma tumor board discussion for each case is an essential practice in order to deliver the best care to these patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the published literature on the past and present role of surgery in the treatment of oligometastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma in order to inform the management of this difficult disease.

Predicting deliverability of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of an aperture complexity metric for volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans to predict plan delivery accuracy. We developed a complexity analysis tool as a plug‐in script to Varian's Eclipse treatment planning system. This script reports the modulation of plans, arcs, and individual control points for VMAT plans using a previously developed complexity metric. The calculated complexities are compared to that of 649 VMAT plans previously treated at our institution from 2013 to mid‐2015. We used the VMAT quality assurance (QA) results from the 649 treated plans, plus 62 plans that failed pretreatment QA, to validate the ability of the complexity metric to predict plan deliverability. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine an appropriate complexity threshold value above which a plan should be considered for reoptimization before it moves further through our planning workflow. The average complexity metric for the 649 treated plans analyzed with the script was 0.132 mm−1 with a standard deviation of 0.036 mm−1. We found that when using a threshold complexity value of 0.180 mm−1, the true positive rate for correctly identifying plans that failed QA was 44%, and the false‐positive rate was 7%. Used clinically with this threshold, the script can identify overly modulated plans and thus prevent a significant portion of QA failures. Reducing VMAT plan complexity has a number of important clinical benefits, including improving plan deliverability and reducing treatment time. Use of the complexity metric during both the planning and QA processes can reduce the number of QA failures and improve the quality of VMAT plans used for treatment.

PACS number(s): 87.55.de, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.jk