1
|
Pedersen MRV, Loft MK, Dam C, Rasmussen LÆL, Timm S. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients with Testicular Tumors—Intra- and Interobserver Variability. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:837-847. [PMID: 35200570 PMCID: PMC8871139 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In general, magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown potential in clinical settings. In testicles parenchyma, the DW imaging helps differentiate and characterize benign from malignant lesions. Placement and size of the region of interest (ROI) may affect the ADC value. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the intra- and interobserver variability in testicular tumors when measuring ADC using various types of regions of interest (ROI). Two observers performed the ADC measurements in testicular lesions based on three ROI methods: (1) whole volume, (2) round, and (3) small sample groups. Intra- and interobserver variability was analyzed for all ROI methods using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and bland-altman plots. The two observers performed the measurements twice, three months apart. A total of 26 malignant testicle tumors were included. Interobserver agreement was excellent in tumor length (ICC = 0.98) and tumor width (ICC = 0.98). In addition, intraobserver agreement was excellent in tumor length (ICC = 0.98) and tumor width (ICC = 0.99). The whole volume interobserver agreement in the first reading was excellent (ICC = 0.93). Round ADC had an excellent (ICC = 0.93) and fair (ICC = 0.58) interobserver agreement, in the first and second reading, respectively. Interobserver agreement in ADC small ROIs was good (ICC = 0.87), and good (ICC = 0.78), in the first and second reading, respectively. Intraobserver agreement varied from fair, good to excellent agreement. The ROI method showed varying inter- and intraobserver agreement in ADC measurement. Using multiple small ROI conceded the highest interobserver variability, and, thus, the whole volume or round seem to be the preferable methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malene Roland Vils Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark; (M.K.L.); (C.D.); (L.Æ.L.R.)
- Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6000 Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark;
- Correspondence:
| | - Martina Kastrup Loft
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark; (M.K.L.); (C.D.); (L.Æ.L.R.)
- Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6000 Kolding, Denmark
| | - Claus Dam
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark; (M.K.L.); (C.D.); (L.Æ.L.R.)
| | - Lone Ærenlund Lohmann Rasmussen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark; (M.K.L.); (C.D.); (L.Æ.L.R.)
| | - Signe Timm
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark;
- Research Unit, Kolding Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6000 Kolding, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|