1
|
Henderson LR, Dam R, Shah SGS, Ovseiko PV, Kiparoglou V. Perceptions of gender equity and markers of achievement in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:102. [PMID: 36153620 PMCID: PMC9509644 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00904-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The need to improve gender equity (GE) in academic medicine is well documented. Biomedical Research Centres (BRCs), partnerships between leading National Health Service (NHS) organizations and universities in England, conduct world-class translational research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). In 2011, eligibility for BRC funding was restricted to universities demonstrating sustained GE success recognized by the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science Silver awards. Despite this structural change, GE research in BRC settings is underdeveloped, yet critical to the acceleration of women’s advancement and leadership. To explore both women’s and men’s perceptions of GE and current markers of achievement in a BRC setting. Methods Thematic analysis of data from two research projects: 53 GE survey respondents’ free-text comments (34 women, 16 men), and 16 semi-structured interviews with women affiliated to the NIHR Oxford BRC. Results Four major themes emerged from the analysis: perceptions of the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science (GE policy); views on monitoring GE in BRCs; views on current markers of achievement in academia and GE; and recommendations for actions to improve GE in BRC settings. Monitoring of GE in BRCs was deemed to be important, but complex. Participants felt that current markers of achievement were not equitable to women, as they did not take contextual factors into account such as maternity leave and caring responsibilities. BRC-specific organizational policies and metrics are needed in order to monitor and catalyse GE. Conclusions Markers of achievement for monitoring GE in BRCs should consider contextual factors specific to BRCs and women’s career progression and professional advancement. GE markers of achievement should be complemented with broader aspects of equality, diversity and inclusion.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bell K, Shah SGS, Henderson LR, Kiparoglou V. Translational researchers' training and development needs, preferences, and barriers: A survey in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in the United Kingdom. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 15:1737-1752. [PMID: 35570378 PMCID: PMC9283734 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective was to identify translational researchers’ training and development needs, preferences, and barriers to attending training. This cross‐sectional study involved an online questionnaire survey. The research population comprised a convenience sample of translational researchers and support staff (N = 798) affiliated with the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. The response rate was 24%. Of 189 respondents, 114 were women (60%) and 75 were men (40%). The respondents were mainly research scientists (31%), medical doctors and dentists (17%), and research nurses and midwives (16%). Many of the respondents had attended at least one training course in the last year (68%). Training in statistics and data analysis was the most common training received (20%). Leadership training was the most wanted training (25%). Morning was the most preferred time of training (60%). Half a day was the ideal duration of a training course (41%). The main teaching hospital site was the most preferred location of training (46%). An interactive workshop was the most favored delivery style of training (52%). Most common barriers to attending training were the lack of time (31%), work (21%) and clinical commitments (19%), and family and childcare responsibilities (14%). Some differences in training needs, preferences, and barriers were found by gender and role, though these were not statistically significant. Translational researchers want short, easily accessible, and interactive training sessions during the working day. The training needs, preferences, and barriers to attending training need to be considered while developing inclusive training programs in biomedical research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bell
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Lorna R Henderson
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Vasiliki Kiparoglou
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henderson LR, McShane H, Kiparoglou V. Rapid research response to the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from a National Institute for Health Biomedical Research Centre. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:24. [PMID: 35183199 PMCID: PMC8857889 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00827-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
With over 5 million COVID-19 deaths at the time of writing, the response of research leaders was and is critical to developing treatments to control the global pandemic. As clinical research leaders urgently repurposed existing research programmes and resources towards the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an opportunity to reflect on practices observed in Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) settings. BRCs are partnerships between leading National Health Service organizations and universities in England conducting translational research for patient benefit funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Oxford BRC-supported researchers have led the rapid set-up of numerous COVID-19 research studies at record speed with global impact. However, the specific contribution of BRCs to the COVID-19 pandemic in the literature is sparse. Firstly, we reflect on the strategic work of clinical research leaders, creating resilient NIHR research infrastructure to facilitate rapid COVID-19 research. Secondly, we discuss how COVID-19 rapid research exemplars supported by Oxford BRC illustrate “capacity”, “readiness” and “capability” at an organizational and individual level to respond to the global pandemic. Rapid response research in turbulent environments requires strategic organizational leadership to create resilient infrastructure and resources. The rapid research exemplars from the Oxford BRC illustrate capability and capacity at an organizational and individual level in a dynamic environment to respond during the COVID-19 public health challenge. This response was underpinned by swift adaptation and repurposing of existing research resources and expertise by the Oxford BRC to deliver rapid research to address different aspects of COVID-19.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shah SGS, Dam R, Milano MJ, Edmunds LD, Henderson LR, Hartley CR, Coxall O, Ovseiko PV, Buchan AM, Kiparoglou V. Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e037935. [PMID: 33757940 PMCID: PMC7993305 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Scientific authorship is a vital marker of achievement in academic careers and gender equity is a key performance metric in research. However, there is little understanding of gender equity in publications in biomedical research centres funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). This study assesses the gender parity in scientific authorship of biomedical research. DESIGN Descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective bibliometric study. SETTING NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). DATA Data comprised 2409 publications that were either accepted or published between April 2012 and March 2017. The publications were classified as basic science studies, clinical studies (both trial and non-trial studies) and other studies (comments, editorials, systematic reviews, reviews, opinions, book chapters, meeting reports, guidelines and protocols). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Gender of authors, defined as a binary variable comprising either male or female categories, in six authorship categories: first author, joint first authors, first corresponding author, joint corresponding authors, last author and joint last authors. RESULTS Publications comprised 39% clinical research (n=939), 27% basic research (n=643) and 34% other types of research (n=827). The proportion of female authors as first author (41%), first corresponding authors (34%) and last author (23%) was statistically significantly lower than male authors in these authorship categories (p<0.001). Of total joint first authors (n=458), joint corresponding authors (n=169) and joint last authors (n=229), female only authors comprised statistically significant (p<0.001) smaller proportions, that is, 15% (n=69), 29% (n=49) and 10% (n=23) respectively, compared with male only authors in these joint authorship categories. There was a statistically significant association between gender of the last author with gender of the first author (p<0.001), first corresponding author (p<0.001) and joint last author (p<0.001). The mean journal impact factor (JIF) was statistically significantly higher when the first corresponding author was male compared with female (Mean JIF: 10.00 vs 8.77, p=0.020); however, the JIF was not statistically different when there were male and female authors as first authors and last authors. CONCLUSIONS Although the proportion of female authors is significantly lower than the proportion of male authors in all six categories of authorship analysed, the proportions of male and female last authors are comparable to their respective proportions as principal investigators in the BRC. These findings suggest positive trends and the NIHR Oxford BRC doing very well in gender parity in the senior (last) authorship category. Male corresponding authors are more likely to publish articles in prestigious journals with high impact factor while both male and female authors at first and last authorship positions publish articles in equally prestigious journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, UK
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Rinita Dam
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Maria Julia Milano
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Laurel D Edmunds
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Lorna R Henderson
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, UK
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | | | - Owen Coxall
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Pavel V Ovseiko
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Alastair M Buchan
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Vasiliki Kiparoglou
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Henderson LR, Shah SGS, Ovseiko PV, Dam R, Buchan AM, McShane H, Kiparoglou V. Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: A two-factor model. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239589. [PMID: 33052933 PMCID: PMC7556494 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The underrepresentation of women in academic medicine at senior level and in leadership positions is well documented. Biomedical Research Centres (BRC), partnerships between leading National Health Service (NHS) organisations and universities, conduct world class translational research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in the UK. Since 2011 BRCs are required to demonstrate significant progress in gender equity (GE) to be eligible to apply for funding. However, the evidence base for monitoring GE specifically in BRC settings is underdeveloped. This is the first survey tool designed to rank and identify new GE markers specific to the NIHR BRCs. METHODS An online survey distributed to senior leadership, clinical and non-clinical researchers, trainees, administrative and other professionals affiliated to the NIHR Oxford BRC (N = 683). Participants ranked 13 markers of GE on a five point Likert scale by importance. Data were summarised using frequencies and descriptive statistics. Interrelationships between markers and underlying latent dimensions (factors) were determined by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS The response rate was 36% (243 respondents). Respondents were more frequently female (55%, n = 133), aged 41-50 years (33%, n = 81), investigators (33%, n = 81) affiliated to the BRC for 2-7 years (39.5%, n = 96). Overall participants ranked 'BRC senior leadership roles' and 'organisational policies on gender equity', to be the most important markers of GE. 58% (n = 141) and 57% (n = 139) respectively. Female participants ranked 'organisational policies' (64.7%, n = 86/133) and 'recruitment and retention' (60.9%, n = 81/133) most highly, whereas male participants ranked 'leadership development' (52.1%, n = 50/96) and 'BRC senior leadership roles' (50%, n = 48/96) as most important. Factor analyses identified two distinct latent dimensions: "organisational markers" and "individual markers" of GE in BRCs. CONCLUSIONS A two-factor model of markers of achievement for GE with "organisational" and "individual" dimensions was identified. Implementation and sustainability of gender equity requires commitment at senior leadership and organisational policy level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna R. Henderson
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Pavel V. Ovseiko
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rinita Dam
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair M. Buchan
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Helen McShane
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vasiliki Kiparoglou
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kalpazidou Schmidt E, Ovseiko PV, Henderson LR, Kiparoglou V. Understanding the Athena SWAN award scheme for gender equality as a complex social intervention in a complex system: analysis of Silver award action plans in a comparative European perspective. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:19. [PMID: 32059678 PMCID: PMC7023775 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-0527-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Given the complex mix of structural, cultural and institutional factors that produce barriers for women in science, an equally complex intervention is required to understand and address them. The Athena SWAN Award Scheme for Gender Equality has become a widespread means to address barriers for women’s advancement and leadership in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, the United States of America and Canada, while the European Commission is exploring the introduction of a similar award scheme across Europe. Methods This study analyses the design and implementation of 16 departmental Athena SWAN Silver Action Plans in Medical Sciences at one of the world’s leading universities in Oxford, United Kingdom. Data pertaining to the design and implementation of gender equality interventions were extracted from the action plans, analysed thematically, coded using categories from the 2015 Athena SWAN Charter Awards Handbook and synthesised against a typology of gender equality interventions in the European Research Area. The results were further analysed against the complexity research literature framework, where research organisations are perceived as dynamic systems that adapt, interact and co-evolve with other systems. Results Athena SWAN is a complex contextually embedded system of action planning within the context of universities. It depends on a multitude of contextual variables that relate in complex, non-linear ways and dynamically adapt to constantly moving targets and new emergent conditions. Athena SWAN Silver Action Plans conform to the key considerations of complexity – (1) multiple actions and areas of intervention with a focus on the complex system being embedded in local dynamics, (2) the non-linearity of interventions and the constantly emerging conditions, and (3) impact in terms of contribution to change, improved conditions to foster change and the increased probability that change can occur. Conclusions To enact effective sustainable structural and cultural change for gender equality, it is necessary to acknowledge and operationalise complexity as a frame of reference. Athena SWAN is the single most comprehensive and systemic gender equality scheme in Europe. It can be further strengthened by promoting the integration of sex and gender analysis in research and education. Gender equality policies in the wider European Research Area can benefit from exploring Athena SWAN’s contextually embedded systemic approach to dynamic action planning and inclusive focus on all genders and categories of staff and students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pavel V Ovseiko
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lorna R Henderson
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vasiliki Kiparoglou
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Colizzi V, Mezzana D, Ovseiko PV, Caiati G, Colonnello C, Declich A, Buchan AM, Edmunds L, Buzan E, Zerbini L, Djilianov D, Kalpazidou Schmidt E, Bielawski KP, Elster D, Salvato M, Alcantara LCJ, Minutolo A, Potestà M, Bachiddu E, Milano MJ, Henderson LR, Kiparoglou V, Friesen P, Sheehan M, Moyankova D, Rusanov K, Wium M, Raszczyk I, Konieczny I, Gwizdala JP, Śledzik K, Barendziak T, Birkholz J, Müller N, Warrelmann J, Meyer U, Filser J, Khouri Barreto F, Montesano C. Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e11745. [PMID: 30843870 PMCID: PMC6427101 DOI: 10.2196/11745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Promoting Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a major strategy of the "Science with and for Society" work program of the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. RRI aims to achieve a better alignment of research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The RRI strategy includes the "keys" of public engagement, open access, gender, ethics, and science education. The Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2) project promotes RRI in 6 European research institutions and universities from Bulgaria, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Poland, and the United Kingdom, in partnership with a further 6 institutions from Brazil, Denmark, Italy, South Africa, Sweden, and the United States. OBJECTIVE The project aims to attain RRI structural change in 6 European institutions by implementing action plans (APs) and developing APs for 3 non-European institutions active in the field of biosciences; use the implementation of APs as a learning process with a view to developing a set of guidelines on the implementation of RRI; and develop a sustainable model for RRI in biosciences. METHODS The project comprises interrelated research and implementation designed to achieve the aforementioned specific objectives. The project is organized into 6 core work packages and 5 supporting work packages. The core work packages deal with the implementation of institutional APs in 6 European institutions based on the structural change activation model. The supporting work packages include technical assistance, learning process on RRI-oriented structural change, monitoring and assessment, communication and dissemination, and project management. RESULTS The project is funded by Horizon 2020 and will run for 4 years (May 2016-April 2020). As of June 2018, the initial phase has been completed. The participating institutions have developed and approved APs and commenced their implementation. An observation tool has been launched by the Technical Assistance Team to collect information from the implementation of APs; the Evaluation & Assessment team has started monitoring the advancement of the project. As part of the communication and dissemination strategy, a project website, a Facebook page, and a Twitter account have been launched and are updated periodically. The International Scientific Advisory Committee has been formed to advise on the reporting and dissemination of the project's results. CONCLUSIONS In the short term, we anticipate that the project will have a considerable impact on the organizational processes and structures, improving the RRI uptake in the participating institutions. In the medium term, we expect to make RRI-oriented organizational change scalable across Europe by developing guidelines on RRI implementation and an RRI model in biosciences. In the long term, we expect that the project would help increase the ability of research institutions to make discoveries and innovations in better alignment with societal needs and values. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/11745.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Colizzi
- Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Mezzana
- Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Pavel V Ovseiko
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Andrea Declich
- Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Alastair M Buchan
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Laurel Edmunds
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Buzan
- Department of Biodiversity, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
| | - Luiz Zerbini
- International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | | - Krzysztof P Bielawski
- Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Doris Elster
- Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Maria Salvato
- University System of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | | | - Marina Potestà
- Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Bachiddu
- Department of History, Humanities and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria J Milano
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lorna R Henderson
- Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vasiliki Kiparoglou
- Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Phoebe Friesen
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Sheehan
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Martha Wium
- International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Izabela Raszczyk
- Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Igor Konieczny
- Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Karol Śledzik
- Faculty of Management, University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Tanja Barendziak
- Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Julia Birkholz
- Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Nicklas Müller
- Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Warrelmann
- Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ute Meyer
- Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Juliane Filser
- Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Carla Montesano
- Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ovseiko PV, Edmunds LD, Pololi LH, Greenhalgh T, Kiparoglou V, Henderson LR, Williamson C, Grant J, Lord GM, Channon KM, Lechler RI, Buchan AM. Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in translational research organisations: a rationale and study protocol. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e009022. [PMID: 26743702 PMCID: PMC4716190 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Translational research organisations (TROs) are a core component of the UK's expanding research base. Equity of career opportunity is key to ensuring a diverse and internationally competitive workforce. The UK now requires TROs to demonstrate how they are supporting gender equity. Yet, the evidence base for documenting such efforts is sparse. This study is designed to inform the acceleration of women's advancement and leadership in two of the UK's leading TROs--the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centres (BRCs) in Oxford and London--through the development, application and dissemination of a conceptual framework and measurement tool. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A cross-sectional retrospective evaluation. A conceptual framework with markers of achievement and corresponding candidate metrics has been specifically designed for this study based on an adapted balanced scorecard approach. It will be refined with an online stakeholder consultation and semistructured interviews to test the face validity and explore practices and mechanisms that influence gender equity in the given settings. Data will be collected via the relevant administrative databases. A comparison of two funding periods (2007-2012 and 2012-2017) will be carried out. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The University of Oxford Clinical Trials and Research Governance Team and the Research and Development Governance Team of Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust reviewed the study and deemed it exempt from full ethics review. The results of the study will be used to inform prospective planning and monitoring within the participating NIHR BRCs with a view to accelerating women's advancement and leadership. Both the results of the study and its methodology will be further disseminated to academics and practitioners through the networks of collaborating TROs, relevant conferences and articles in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel V Ovseiko
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Laurel D Edmunds
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Linda H Pololi
- National Initiative on Gender, Culture and Leadership in Medicine: C-Change, Brandeis University Women's Studies Research Center, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vasiliki Kiparoglou
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Joint Research Office, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Lorna R Henderson
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Joint Research Office, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Catherine Williamson
- Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Graham M Lord
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Guys’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Keith M Channon
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Joint Research Office, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Alastair M Buchan
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Joint Research Office, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Garceau L, Henderson J, Davis LJ, Petrou S, Henderson LR, McVeigh E, Barlow DH, Davidson LL. Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:3090-109. [PMID: 12456608 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately one in six couples experiences problems with their fertility at some point in their reproductive lives. The economic implications of the use of assisted reproductive techniques require consideration. Herein, the health economics research in this area are critically appraised. METHODS Multiple strategies were used to identify relevant studies. Each title and abstract was independently reviewed by two members of the study team and categorized according to perceived relevance. The selected papers were then assessed for quality and data were extracted, converted to UK pounds sterling at 1999/2000 prices, tabulated and critically appraised. RESULTS A total of 2547 papers was identified through the searches; this resulted in 30 economic evaluations, 22 cost studies and five economic benefit studies that met the selection criteria. The quality of these studies was mixed; many failed to disaggregate costs, discount future costs or conduct sensitivity analyses. Consistent findings included the following: initiating treatment with intrauterine insemination appeared to be more cost-effective than IVF; vasectomy reversal appeared to be more cost-effective than ICSI; factors associated with poor prognosis decreased the cost-effectiveness of interventions. CONCLUSIONS The cost-effectiveness of different interventions should be considered when making decisions about treatment. Future economic appraisals of assisted reproductive techniques would benefit from more robust methodology than is evident in much of the published literature to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Garceau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Henderson LR, Scott A. The costs of caring for stroke patients in a GP-led community hospital: an application of programme budgeting and marginal analysis. Health Soc Care Community 2001; 9:244-254. [PMID: 11560740 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00300.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
There has been little evaluation of the role of community hospitals in the provision of integrated health care services in a primary care-led health system. The aim of this study was to model the probable changes in the use of NHS resources from the introduction of integrated stroke care in a general pracititioner-led community hospital. A programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) exercise was conducted combining practice data for the 'before' period and data from the literature to model the 'after' period. Data were collected from all patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of stroke 1994-96 in Nairn and Ardersier Total Fundholding pilot site, Highland Health Board, Scotland. Under several assumptions, a policy of early discharge of patients to the community hospital, and/or avoiding admission at the acute trust and admitting patients to the community hospital directly (except emergencies), is likely to result in a reduction of the total annual costs of treating stroke patients, from 183,000 pounds per annum to, at most, 74,000 pounds. The analysis of routine discharge data since integrated stroke care was set up has shown that progress has been made in shifting the treatment of patients from the acute trust to the community hospital. The care of stroke patients in a GP-led community hospital is likely to reduce the use of scarce health service resources. Current evidence suggests that health outcomes are unchanged due to early discharge, but further research is required to ensure that patients' health status and quality of life are maintained before such a policy is widely adopted.
Collapse
|
11
|
Henderson LR. A survey of teenage pregnant women and their male partners in the Grampian region. Br J Fam Plann 1999; 25:90-2. [PMID: 10567056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
This paper describes an exploratory pilot study of the male partners of teenagers presenting for either termination of pregnancy (TOP) or antenatal care (ANC). Seventy-five teenage pregnant women were recruited into the study and were asked to complete a questionnaire. The results suggest that the male partners tended to be older than their teenage partners. Teenage pregnant women presenting for termination of pregnancy had statistically significant higher levels of education, compared to those presenting for antenatal care. An association was found between the women's decision to continue or not with the pregnancy and her chosen form of contraception. In the antenatal group, women tended to state that their male partner's indication of support had influenced their decision to continue with the pregnancy. In-depth research should be conducted on the male partners of teenage pregnant women if effective sex education interventions are to be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Henderson
- Royal College of Nursing Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Henderson LR. Rationale for removable prosthodontic aftercare. INT J PROSTHODONT 1988; 1:186-9. [PMID: 2855019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|