1
|
Kegler MC, Anderson K, Bundy LT, Knauf D, Halfacre J, Escoffery C, Cramblit A, Henderson P. A Qualitative Study about Creating Smoke-free Home Rules in American Indian and Alaska Native Households. J Community Health 2019; 44:684-693. [PMID: 31025142 PMCID: PMC6612306 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-019-00666-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Smoke-free homes can reduce exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and support smoking cessation. The current study seeks to understand perspectives, including barriers and facilitators, on smoke-free homes among five American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. Guided by a national work group of tribal partners, ten focus groups were conducted with AI/AN adult smokers and nonsmokers (n = 95) in Alaska, California, Michigan and Oklahoma, stratified by smoking status. The majority of participants lived in single unit detached homes (70.5%). Most of the nonsmokers had a smoke-free home rule (92.9%) and a majority of smokers did as well (64.7%). The most common reasons for smoke-free home rules were protecting children and grandchildren, including children with health problems. Challenges to a smoke-free home included weather and visitors who smoked, along with the inconvenience of going outside, the habit of smoking inside, the need to watch a young child, safety concerns, and smokers who break the rules. Respecting rules and respecting elders emerged as important themes. Traditional use of tobacco in the home was viewed as quite distinct from recreational or everyday use. Over half (58.2%) reported never using tobacco for ceremonial, prayer or traditional reasons in their homes. Given unique considerations for the adoption of smoke-free homes in AI/AN communities, particularly regarding the use of sacred tobacco for traditional, ceremonial, or medicinal purposes, it is important to learn which barriers and facilitators are similar to the general population and which may be unique to tribal communities in the U.S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C Kegler
- Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Katherine Anderson
- Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Lucja T Bundy
- Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | | | - June Halfacre
- Cherokee Nation, 17675 S Muskogee, P. O. Box 948, Tahlequah, OK, 74464, USA
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Andre Cramblit
- United Indian Health Services: Potawot Health Village, 1600 Weeot Way, Arcata, CA, 95521, USA
| | - Patricia Henderson
- Black Hills Center for American Indian Health, 701 St. Joseph Street, Suite 204, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson KM, Kegler MC, Bundy LT, Henderson P, Halfacre J, Escoffery C. Adaptation of a brief smoke-free homes intervention for American Indian and Alaska Native families. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:981. [PMID: 31337379 PMCID: PMC6651935 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7301-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of adaptation is to maintain the effectiveness of the original intervention by preserving the core elements that account for its success while delivering an intervention that is tailored to the new community and/or cultural context. The current study describes the process of adapting an evidence-based smoke-free homes (SFH) intervention for use in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) households. METHODS We followed a systematic adaptation process. We first assessed the community through focus groups coordinated in collaboration with tribal partners. Because our team included the original developers of the intervention, the steps of understanding the intervention, selecting the intervention and consulting with experts were simplified. Additional steps included consulting with stakeholders through a national work group and collaboratively deciding what needed adaptation. RESULTS A number of key themes pertinent to the adaptation of the SFH intervention were identified in the focus groups. These included the gravity of messaging about commercial tobacco use; respect, familialism, and intergenerationalism; imagery, including significant symbolism, colors, and representative role models; whether and how to address traditional tobacco; and, barriers to a SFH not adequately addressed in the original materials. CONCLUSIONS Adaptation of an intervention to create smoke-free homes in AI/AN families necessitated both surface structure changes such as appearance of role models and deep structure changes that addressed core values, and beliefs and traditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M. Anderson
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Michelle C. Kegler
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Lucja T. Bundy
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | | | - Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kegler MC, Haardörfer R, Melanson T, Allen L, Bundy LT, Kreuter MW, Williams RS, Hovell MF, Mullen PD. Steps Toward Scalability: Illustrations From a Smoke-Free Homes Program. Health Educ Behav 2019; 46:773-781. [PMID: 31165637 DOI: 10.1177/1090198119848767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Scalable interventions remain effective across a range of real-world settings and can be modified to fit organizational and community context. "Smoke-Free Homes: Some Things are Better Outside" has been effective in promoting smoke-free home rules in low-income households in efficacy, effectiveness, generalizability, and dissemination studies. Using data from a dissemination study in collaboration with five 2-1-1 call centers in Ohio, Florida, Oklahoma, and Alabama (n = 2,345 households), this article examines key dimensions of scalability, including effectiveness by subpopulation, secondary outcomes, identification of core elements driving effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Evaluated by 2-1-1 staff using a pre-post design with self-reported outcomes at 2 months postbaseline, the program was equally effective for men and women, across education levels, with varying number of smokers in the home, and whether children were present in the home or not. It was more effective for nonsmokers, those who smoked fewer cigarettes per day, and African Americans. Creating a smoke-free home was associated with a new smoke-free vehicle rule (odds ratio [OR] = 3.38, confidence interval [CI 2.58, 4.42]), decreased exposure to secondhand smoke among nonsmokers (b = -2.33, p < .0001), and increased cessation among smokers (OR = 5.8, CI [3.81, 8.81]). Use of each program component was significantly associated with success in creating a smoke-free home. Using an intent-to-treat effect size of 40.1%, program benefits from 5 years of health care savings exceed program costs yielding a net savings of $9,633 for delivery to 100 households. Cost effectiveness, subpopulation analyses, and identification of core elements can help in assessing the scalability potential of research-tested interventions such as this smoke-free homes program.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kegler MC, Haardörfer R, Bundy LT, Escoffery C, Berg CJ, Fernandez M, Williams R, Hovell M. Do partial home smoking bans signal progress toward a smoke-free home? Health Educ Res 2016; 31:24-35. [PMID: 26661723 PMCID: PMC4883035 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Understanding who establishes partial home smoking bans, what these bans cover, and whether they are an intermediate step in going smoke-free would help to inform smoke-free home interventions. Participants were recruited from United Way of Greater Atlanta's 2-1-1 contact center. Data were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months via telephone interview. Participants (n = 375) were mostly African American (84.2%) and female (84.3%). The majority (58.5%) had annual household incomes <$10,000. At baseline, 61.3% reported a partial smoking ban and 38.7% reported no ban. Existence of a partial ban as compared with no ban was associated with being female, having more than a high school education, being married and younger age. Partial bans most often meant smoking was allowed only in designated rooms (52.6%). Other common rules included: no smoking in the presence of children (18.4%) and smoking allowed only in combination with actions such as opening a window or running a fan (9.8%). A higher percentage of households with partial bans at baseline were smoke-free at 6 months (36.5%) compared with households with no bans at baseline (22.1%). Households with partial smoking bans may have a higher level of readiness to go smoke-free than households with no restrictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C Kegler
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322,
| | - Regine Haardörfer
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Lucja T Bundy
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Carla J Berg
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Maria Fernandez
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Rebecca Williams
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510 and
| | - Mel Hovell
- Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 91941, USA
| |
Collapse
|