1
|
Liu Z, Alexander JL, Yee Eng K, Ibraheim H, Anandabaskaran S, Saifuddin A, Constable L, Castro Seoane R, Bewshea C, Nice R, D’Mello A, Jones GR, Balarajah S, Fiorentino F, Sebastian S, Irving PM, Hicks LC, Williams HRT, Kent AJ, Linger R, Parkes M, Kok K, Patel KV, Teare JP, Altmann DM, Boyton RJ, Hart AL, Lees CW, Goodhand JR, Kennedy NA, Pollock KM, Ahmad T, Powell N. Antibody Responses to Influenza Vaccination are Diminished in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Infliximab or Tofacitinib. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:560-569. [PMID: 37941436 PMCID: PMC11037107 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We sought to determine whether six commonly used immunosuppressive regimens were associated with lower antibody responses after seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. METHODS We conducted a prospective study including 213 IBD patients and 53 healthy controls: 165 who had received seasonal influenza vaccine and 101 who had not. IBD medications included infliximab, thiopurines, infliximab and thiopurine combination therapy, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib. The primary outcome was antibody responses against influenza/A H3N2 and A/H1N1, compared to controls, adjusting for age, prior vaccination, and interval between vaccination and sampling. RESULTS Lower antibody responses against influenza A/H3N2 were observed in patients on infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.20-0.60], p = 0.0002), combination of infliximab and thiopurine therapy (0.46 [0.27-0.79], p = 0.0050), and tofacitinib (0.28 [0.14-0.57], p = 0.0005) compared to controls. Lower antibody responses against A/H1N1 were observed in patients on infliximab (0.29 [0.15-0.56], p = 0.0003), combination of infliximab and thiopurine therapy (0.34 [0.17-0.66], p = 0.0016), thiopurine monotherapy (0.46 [0.24-0.87], p = 0.017), and tofacitinib (0.23 [0.10-0.56], p = 0.0013). Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were not associated with reduced antibody responses against A/H3N2 or A/H1N1. Vaccination in the previous year was associated with higher antibody responses to A/H3N2. Vaccine-induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentration weakly correlated with antibodies against H3N2 [r = 0.27; p = 0.0004] and H1N1 [r = 0.33; p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS Vaccination in both the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 seasons was associated with significantly higher antibody responses to influenza/A than no vaccination or vaccination in 2021-2022 alone. Infliximab and tofacitinib are associated with lower binding antibody responses to influenza/A, similar to COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigang Liu
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James L Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Kai Yee Eng
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sulak Anandabaskaran
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Aamir Saifuddin
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Laura Constable
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rocio Castro Seoane
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rachel Nice
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Exeter Clinical Laboratory International, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrea D’Mello
- Division of Medicine & Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth R Jones
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharmili Balarajah
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Unit [King’s Clinical Trials Unit], King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Hicks
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra J Kent
- Department of Gastroenterology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Linger
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bart’s Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal V Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George’s Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Julian P Teare
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel M Altmann
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary J Boyton
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lung Division, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Katrina M Pollock
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Z, Alexander JL, Le K, Zhou X, Ibraheim H, Anandabaskaran S, Saifuddin A, Lin KW, McFarlane LR, Constable L, Seoane RC, Anand N, Bewshea C, Nice R, D'Mello A, Jones GR, Balarajah S, Fiorentino F, Sebastian S, Irving PM, Hicks LC, Williams HRT, Kent AJ, Linger R, Parkes M, Kok K, Patel KV, Teare JP, Altmann DM, Boyton RJ, Hart AL, Lees CW, Goodhand JR, Kennedy NA, Pollock KM, Ahmad T, Powell N. Neutralising antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/5 and wild-type virus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease following three doses of COVID-19 vaccine (VIP): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 64:102249. [PMID: 37842172 PMCID: PMC10570718 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving anti-TNF and JAK-inhibitor therapy have attenuated responses to COVID-19 vaccination. We aimed to determine how IBD treatments affect neutralising antibody responses against the Omicron BA.4/5 variant. Methods In this multicentre cohort study, we prospectively recruited 340 adults (69 healthy controls and 271 IBD) at nine UK hospitals between May 28, 2021 and March 29, 2022. The IBD study population was established (>12 weeks therapy) on either thiopurine (n = 63), infliximab (n = 45), thiopurine and infliximab combination therapy (n = 48), ustekinumab (n = 45), vedolizumab (n = 46) or tofacitinib (n = 24). Patients were excluded if they were being treated with any other immunosuppressive therapies. Participants had two doses of either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 vaccines, followed by a third dose of either BNT162b2 or mRNA1273. Pseudo-neutralisation assays against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and BA.4/5 were performed. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (NT50) of participant sera was calculated. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising response against wild-type virus and Omicron BA.4/5 variant after the second and third doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy, adjusting for prior infection, vaccine type, age, and interval between vaccination and blood collection. This study is registered with ISRCTN (No. 13495664). Findings Both heterologous (first two doses adenovirus vaccine, third dose mRNA vaccine) and homologous (three doses mRNA vaccine) vaccination strategies significantly increased neutralising titres against both wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Omicron BA.4/5 variant in healthy participants and patients with IBD. Antibody titres against BA.4/5 were significantly lower than antibodies against wild-type virus in both healthy participants and patients with IBD (p < 0.0001). Multivariable models demonstrated that neutralising antibodies against BA.4/5 after three doses of vaccine were significantly lower in patients with IBD on infliximab (Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) 0.19 [0.10, 0.36], p < 0.0001), infliximab and thiopurine combination (GMR 0.25 [0.13, 0.49], p < 0.0001) or tofacitinib (GMR 0.43 [0.20, 0.91], p = 0.028), but not in patients on thiopurine monotherapy, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab. Breakthrough infection was associated with lower neutralising antibodies against wild-type (p = 0.037) and BA.4/5 (p = 0.045). Interpretation A third dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine based on the wild-type spike glycoprotein significantly boosts neutralising antibody titres in patients with IBD. However, responses are lower against the Omicron variant BA.4/5, particularly in patients taking anti-TNF and JAK-inhibitor therapy. Breakthrough infections are associated with lower neutralising antibodies and immunosuppressed patients with IBD may receive additional benefit from bivalent vaccine boosters which target Omicron variants. Funding Pfizer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigang Liu
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James L. Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kaixing Le
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sulak Anandabaskaran
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Aamir Saifuddin
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Kathy Weitung Lin
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Leon R. McFarlane
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Constable
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rocio Castro Seoane
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nikhil Anand
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rachel Nice
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Exeter Clinical Laboratory International, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrea D'Mello
- Division of Medicine & Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth R. Jones
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharmili Balarajah
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Unit (King’s Clinical Trials Unit), King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter M. Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy C. Hicks
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Horace RT. Williams
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Rachel Linger
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal V. Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Julian P. Teare
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel M. Altmann
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary J. Boyton
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lung Division, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ailsa L. Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Charlie W. Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James R. Goodhand
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicholas A. Kennedy
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Katrina M. Pollock
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saifuddin A, Kent AJ, Mehta SJ, Hicks LC, Gonzalez HA, Segal JP, Brookes MJ, Subramanian S, Bhala N, Conley TE, Patel KV, Lamb CA, Walker GJ, Kennedy NA, Sebastian S. Treatment adaptations and outcomes of patients experiencing inflammatory bowel disease flares during the early COVID-19 pandemic: the PREPARE-IBD multicentre cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56:1460-1474. [PMID: 36196569 PMCID: PMC9874879 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic offered a unique opportunity to understand inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management during unexpected disruption. This could help to guide practice overall. AIMS To compare prescribing behaviour for IBD flares and outcomes during the early pandemic with pre-pandemic findings METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study comprising patients who contacted IBD teams for symptomatic flares between March and June 2020 in 60 National Health Service trusts in the United Kingdom. Data were compared with a pre-pandemic cohort after propensity-matching for age and physician global assessment of disease activity. RESULTS We included 1864 patients in each of the pandemic and pre-pandemic cohorts. The principal findings were reduced systemic corticosteroid prescription during the pandemic in Crohn's disease (prednisolone: pandemic 26.5% vs. 37.1%; p < 0.001) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (prednisolone: pandemic 33.5% vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001), with increases in poorly bioavailable oral corticosteroids in Crohn's (pandemic 15.6% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.001) and UC (pandemic 11.8% vs. 5.2%; p < 0.001). Ustekinumab (Crohn's and UC) and vedolizumab (UC) treatment also significantly increased. Three-month steroid-free remission in each period was similar in Crohn's (pandemic 28.4% vs. 32.1%; p = 0.17) and UC (pandemic 36.4% vs. 40.2%; p = 0.095). Patients experiencing a flare and suspected COVID-19 were more likely to have moderately-to-severely active disease at 3 months than those with a flare alone. CONCLUSIONS Despite treatment adaptations during the pandemic, steroid-free outcomes were comparable with pre-pandemic levels, although concurrent flare and suspected COVID-19 caused worse outcomes. These findings have implications for IBD management during future pandemics and for standard practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandra J. Kent
- Department of GastroenterologyKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - Lucy C. Hicks
- Department of GastroenterologyImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Haidee A. Gonzalez
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustHullUK,Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of HullHullUK
| | - Jonathan P. Segal
- Department of GastroenterologyImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Matthew J. Brookes
- Department of GastroenterologyRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustWolverhamptonUK,Faculty of Science and EngineeringUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK
| | - Sreedhar Subramanian
- Department of GastroenterologyRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS TrustLiverpoolUK,Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Neeraj Bhala
- Department of Gastrointestinal MedicineQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK,Institute of Applied Health Research, Institute of Translational MedicineUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Thomas E. Conley
- Department of GastroenterologyRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS TrustLiverpoolUK
| | - Kamal V. Patel
- Department of GastroenterologySt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - Christopher A. Lamb
- Translational and Clinical Research InstituteNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK,Department of GastroenterologyNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Gareth J. Walker
- Department of GastroenterologyTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation TrustTorquayUK
| | - Nicholas A. Kennedy
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustExeterUK,Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research GroupUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustHullUK,Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of HullHullUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alexander JL, Liu Z, Muñoz Sandoval D, Reynolds C, Ibraheim H, Anandabaskaran S, Saifuddin A, Castro Seoane R, Anand N, Nice R, Bewshea C, D'Mello A, Constable L, Jones GR, Balarajah S, Fiorentino F, Sebastian S, Irving PM, Hicks LC, Williams HRT, Kent AJ, Linger R, Parkes M, Kok K, Patel KV, Teare JP, Altmann DM, Goodhand JR, Hart AL, Lees CW, Boyton RJ, Kennedy NA, Ahmad T, Powell N. COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody and T-cell responses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease after the third vaccine dose (VIP): a multicentre, prospective, case-control study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:1005-1015. [PMID: 36088954 PMCID: PMC9458592 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00274-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses are reduced in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) taking anti-TNF or tofacitinib after two vaccine doses. We sought to assess whether immunosuppressive treatments were associated with reduced antibody and T-cell responses in patients with IBD after a third vaccine dose. METHODS VIP was a multicentre, prospective, case-control study done in nine centres in the UK. We recruited immunosuppressed patients with IBD and non-immunosuppressed healthy individuals. All participants were aged 18 years or older. The healthy control group had no diagnosis of IBD and no current treatment with systemic immunosuppressive therapy for any other indication. The immunosuppressed patients with IBD had an established diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or unclassified IBD using standard definitions of IBD, and were receiving established treatment with one of six immunosuppressive regimens for at least 12 weeks at the time of first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. All participants had to have received three doses of an approved COVID-19 vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody binding and T-cell responses were measured in all participant groups. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1 receptor binding domain [RBD]) antibody concentration 28-49 days after the third vaccine dose, adjusted by age, homologous versus heterologous vaccine schedule, and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was assessed in all participants with available data. FINDINGS Between Oct 18, 2021, and March 29, 2022, 352 participants were included in the study (thiopurine n=65, infliximab n=46, thiopurine plus infliximab combination therapy n=49, ustekinumab n=44, vedolizumab n=50, tofacitinib n=26, and healthy controls n=72). Geometric mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD antibody concentrations increased in all groups following a third vaccine dose, but were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab (2736·8 U/mL [geometric SD 4·3]; p<0·0001), infliximab plus thiopurine (1818·3 U/mL [6·7]; p<0·0001), and tofacitinib (8071·5 U/mL [3·1]; p=0·0018) compared with the healthy control group (16 774·2 U/mL [2·6]). There were no significant differences in anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD antibody concentrations between the healthy control group and patients treated with thiopurine (12 019·7 U/mL [2·2]; p=0·099), ustekinumab (11 089·3 U/mL [2·8]; p=0·060), or vedolizumab (13 564·9 U/mL [2·4]; p=0·27). In multivariable modelling, lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD antibody concentrations were independently associated with infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0·15 [95% CI 0·11-0·21]; p<0·0001), tofacitinib (0·52 [CI 0·31-0·87]; p=0·012), and thiopurine (0·69 [0·51-0·95]; p=0·021), but not with ustekinumab (0·64 [0·39-1·06]; p=0·083), or vedolizumab (0·84 [0·54-1·30]; p=0·43). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (1·58 [1·22-2·05]; p=0·0006) was independently associated with higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD antibody concentrations and older age (0·88 [0·80-0·97]; p=0·0073) was independently associated with lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD antibody concentrations. Antigen-specific T-cell responses were similar in all groups, except for recipients of tofacitinib without evidence of previous infection, where T-cell responses were significantly reduced relative to healthy controls (p=0·021). INTERPRETATION A third dose of COVID-19 vaccine induced a boost in antibody binding in immunosuppressed patients with IBD, but these responses were reduced in patients taking infliximab, infliximab plus thiopurine, and tofacitinib. Tofacitinib was also associated with reduced T-cell responses. These findings support continued prioritisation of immunosuppressed groups for further vaccine booster dosing, particularly patients on anti-TNF and JAK inhibitors. FUNDING Pfizer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Liu
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sulak Anandabaskaran
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Aamir Saifuddin
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Rocio Castro Seoane
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nikhil Anand
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Nice
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry, Exeter Clinical Laboratory International, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrea D'Mello
- Division of Medicine and Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Laura Constable
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth R Jones
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharmili Balarajah
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Hicks
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra J Kent
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Linger
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal V Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Julian P Teare
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel M Altmann
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rosemary J Boyton
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK; Lung Division, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Powles STR, Gallagher KI, Chong LWL, Alexander JL, Mullish BH, Hicks LC, McDonald JAK, Marchesi JR, Williams HRT, Orchard TR. Effects of bowel preparation on intestinal bacterial associated urine and faecal metabolites and the associated faecal microbiome. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:240. [PMID: 35562657 PMCID: PMC9101932 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02301-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Urinary and faecal metabolic profiling have been extensively studied in gastrointestinal diseases as potential diagnostic markers, and to enhance our understanding of the intestinal microbiome in the pathogenesis these conditions. The impact of bowel cleansing on the microbiome has been investigated in several studies, but limited to just one study on the faecal metabolome. Aim To compare the effects of bowel cleansing on the composition of the faecal microbiome, and the urine and faecal metabolome. Methods Urine and faecal samples were obtained from eleven patients undergoing colonoscopy at baseline, and then at day 3 and week 6 after colonoscopy. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to analyse changes in the microbiome, and metabonomic analysis was performed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy. Results Microbiomic analysis demonstrated a reduction in alpha diversity (Shannon index) between samples taken at baseline and three days following bowel cleansing (p = 0.002), and there was no significant difference between samples at baseline and six weeks post colonoscopy. Targeted and non-targeted analysis of urinary and faecal bacterial associated metabolites showed no significant impact following bowel cleansing. Conclusions Bowel cleansing causes a temporary disturbance in bacterial alpha diversity measured in faeces, but no significant changes in the faecal and urine metabolic profiles, suggesting that overall the faecal microbiome and its associated metabolome is resistant to the effects of an induced osmotic diarrhoea. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02301-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam T R Powles
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
| | - Kate I Gallagher
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Leo W L Chong
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - James L Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Benjamin H Mullish
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Lucy C Hicks
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Julie A K McDonald
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.,MRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Flowers Building, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Julian R Marchesi
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Timothy R Orchard
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alexander JL, Kennedy NA, Ibraheim H, Anandabaskaran S, Saifuddin A, Castro Seoane R, Liu Z, Nice R, Bewshea C, D'Mello A, Constable L, Jones GR, Balarajah S, Fiorentino F, Sebastian S, Irving PM, Hicks LC, Williams HRT, Kent AJ, Linger R, Parkes M, Kok K, Patel KV, Teare JP, Altmann DM, Boyton RJ, Goodhand JR, Hart AL, Lees CW, Ahmad T, Powell N. COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (VIP): a multicentre, prospective, case-control study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:342-352. [PMID: 35123676 PMCID: PMC8813209 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00005-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects that therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are not yet fully known. Therefore, we sought to determine whether COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses were altered in patients with IBD on commonly used immunosuppressive drugs. METHODS In this multicentre, prospective, case-control study (VIP), we recruited adults with IBD treated with one of six different immunosuppressive treatment regimens (thiopurines, infliximab, a thiopurine plus infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib) and healthy control participants from nine centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccines (either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [Oxford-AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech], or mRNA1273 [Moderna]) 6-12 weeks apart (according to scheduling adopted in the UK). We measured antibody responses 53-92 days after a second vaccine dose using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations in participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, adjusted by age and vaccine type, and was analysed by use of multivariable linear regression models. This study is registered in the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN13495664, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between May 31 and Nov 24, 2021, we recruited 483 participants, including patients with IBD being treated with thiopurines (n=78), infliximab (n=63), a thiopurine plus infliximab (n=72), ustekinumab (n=57), vedolizumab (n=62), or tofacitinib (n=30), and 121 healthy controls. We included 370 participants without evidence of previous infection in our primary analysis. Geometric mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab (156·8 U/mL [geometric SD 5·7]; p<0·0001), infliximab plus thiopurine (111·1 U/mL [5·7]; p<0·0001), or tofacitinib (429·5 U/mL [3·1]; p=0·0012) compared with controls (1578·3 U/mL [3·7]). There were no significant differences in antibody concentrations between patients treated with thiopurine monotherapy (1019·8 U/mL [4·3]; p=0·74), ustekinumab (582·4 U/mL [4·6]; p=0·11), or vedolizumab (954·0 U/mL [4·1]; p=0·50) and healthy controls. In multivariable modelling, lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were independently associated with infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0·12, 95% CI 0·08-0·17; p<0·0001) and tofacitinib (0·43, 0·23-0·81; p=0·0095), but not with ustekinumab (0·69, 0·41-1·19; p=0·18), thiopurines (0·89, 0·64-1·24; p=0·50), or vedolizumab (1·16, 0·74-1·83; p=0·51). mRNA vaccines (3·68, 2·80-4·84; p<0·0001; vs adenovirus vector vaccines) were independently associated with higher antibody concentrations and older age per decade (0·79, 0·72-0·87; p<0·0001) with lower antibody concentrations. INTERPRETATION For patients with IBD, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines varies according to immunosuppressive drug exposure, and is attenuated in recipients of infliximab, infliximab plus thiopurines, and tofacitinib. Scheduling of third primary, or booster, doses could be personalised on the basis of an individual's treatment, and patients taking anti-tumour necrosis factor and tofacitinib should be prioritised. FUNDING Pfizer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sulak Anandabaskaran
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Aamir Saifuddin
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Rocio Castro Seoane
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Liu
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Nice
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry-Exeter Clinical Laboratory International, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrea D'Mello
- Division of Medicine and Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Laura Constable
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth R Jones
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharmili Balarajah
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Hicks
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra J Kent
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Linger
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal V Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Julian P Teare
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel M Altmann
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary J Boyton
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Radhakrishnan ST, Alexander JL, Mullish BH, Gallagher KI, Powell N, Hicks LC, Hart AL, Li JV, Marchesi JR, Williams HRT. Systematic review: the association between the gut microbiota and medical therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:26-48. [PMID: 34751954 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gut microbiota has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with Faecalibacterium prausnitizii associated with protection, and certain genera (including Shigella and Escherichia) associated with adverse features. The variability of patient response to medical therapies in IBD is incompletely understood. Given the recognised contribution of the microbiota to treatment efficacy in other conditions, there may be interplay between the gut microbiota, IBD medical therapy and IBD phenotype. AIMS To evaluate the bidirectional relationship between IBD medical therapies and the gut microbiota. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. All original studies analysing interactions between the gut microbiota and established IBD medical therapies were included. RESULTS We screened 1296 records; 19 studies were eligible. There was heterogeneity in terms of sample analysis, treatment protocols, and outcome reporting. Increased baseline α-diversity was observed in responders versus non-responders treated with exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), infliximab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab. Higher baseline Faecalibacterium predicted response to infliximab and ustekinumab. A post-treatment increase in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was noted in responders to aminosalicylates, anti-TNF medications and ustekinumab; conversely, this species decreased in responders to EEN. Escherichia was a consistent marker of unfavourable drug response, and its presence in the gut mucosa correlated with inflammation in aminosalicylate-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Both gut microbiota diversity and specific taxonomic features (including high abundance of Faecalibacterium) are associated with the efficacy of a range of IBD therapies. These findings hold promise for a potential role for the gut microbiota in explaining the heterogeneity of patient response to IBD treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiva T Radhakrishnan
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James L Alexander
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Benjamin H Mullish
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kate I Gallagher
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Hicks
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jia V Li
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Julian R Marchesi
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lamb CA, Sebastian S, Kent AJ, Segal JP, Gonzalez HA, Brookes MJ, Mehta SJ, Subramanian S, Bhala N, Hicks LC, Conley TE, Patel KV, Walker GJ, Kennedy NA. Letter: risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes associated with inflammatory bowel disease medications-reassuring insights from the United Kingdom PREPARE-IBD multicentre cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 53:1236-1240. [PMID: 33961708 PMCID: PMC8207069 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
LINKED CONTENT This article is linked to Taxonera et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15804
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Metabonomic techniques have considerable potential in the field of clinical diagnostics, typifying the application of a translational research paradigm. Care must be taken at all stages to apply appropriate methodology with accurate patient selection and profiling, and rigorous data acquisition and handling, to ensure clinical validity.An ever-increasing number of publications in a wide range of diseases and diverse patient groups suggest a variety of potential clinical uses; prospective studies in large validation cohorts are required to bring metabonomics into routine clinical practice. In this chapter, the utility of metabonomics as a diagnostic tool will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy C Hicks
- Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hicks LC, Huang J, Kumar S, Powles ST, Orchard TR, Hanna GB, Williams HRT. Analysis of Exhaled Breath Volatile Organic Compounds in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pilot Study. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9:731-7. [PMID: 26071410 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Distinguishing between the inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD], Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], is important for determining management and prognosis. Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry [SIFT-MS] may be used to analyse volatile organic compounds [VOCs] in exhaled breath: these may be altered in disease states, and distinguishing breath VOC profiles can be identified. The aim of this pilot study was to identify, quantify, and analyse VOCs present in the breath of IBD patients and controls, potentially providing insights into disease pathogenesis and complementing current diagnostic algorithms. METHODS SIFT-MS breath profiling of 56 individuals [20 UC, 18 CD, and 18 healthy controls] was undertaken. Multivariate analysis included principal components analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis with orthogonal signal correction [OSC-PLS-DA]. Receiver operating characteristic [ROC] analysis was performed for each comparative analysis using statistically significant VOCs. RESULTS OSC-PLS-DA modelling was able to distinguish both CD and UC from healthy controls and from one other with good sensitivity and specificity. ROC analysis using combinations of statistically significant VOCs [dimethyl sulphide, hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, butanal, and nonanal] gave integrated areas under the curve of 0.86 [CD vs healthy controls], 0.74 [UC vs healthy controls], and 0.83 [CD vs UC]. CONCLUSIONS Exhaled breath VOC profiling was able to distinguish IBD patients from controls, as well as to separate UC from CD, using both multivariate and univariate statistical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy C Hicks
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London UK
| | - Juzheng Huang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London UK
| | - Sacheen Kumar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London UK
| | - Sam T Powles
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London UK
| | - Timothy R Orchard
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London UK
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London UK
| |
Collapse
|