Metabolic Surgery and Class 1 Obesity (< 35 kg/m2): a Prospective Study with Short-, Mid-, and Long-term Results Among Latinos

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic surgery for managing class 1 obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus has recently gained popularity. The Latino population presents high rates of these diseases. Reports on surgical outcomes in this population are scarce.

METHODS

Prospective study with Mexican patients diagnosed with diabetes and class 1 obesity submitted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The objective was to determine short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes (weight loss, metabolic, morbidity, and diabetes remission). Sub-analysis was included, based on preoperative usage of one (group A) or more (group B) oral hypoglycemic agents ± insulin.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with a mean body mass index of 33.1 ± 1.9 kg/m², and glycated hemoglobin 7.2 ± 1.7% were included. Significant improvements were observed in almost every parameter. At 24, 36, and 60 months, complete diabetes remission was achieved in 73.8%, 52.2%, and 50% of patients with glycated hemoglobin levels of 5.7% ± 0.8%, 5.8% ± 0.5%, and 6.1% ± 0.8%, respectively. At 24, 36, and 60 months, patients in group A (N=28) showed 90.9%, 69.2%, and 75% remission, respectively, versus patients in group B (N=23), who had remission rates of 50%, 30%, and 25% during the same period. Diabetes relapse was higher in patients using ≥ 2 oral hypoglycemic agents ± insulin before surgery.

CONCLUSION

Gastric bypass is a safe and effective metabolic surgery that results in excellent mid- and long-term results among Mexicans. Patients using one drug preoperatively showed improved results and remission rates, which underscores the importance of intervening in the early stages of the disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials identifier: NCT04595396 ( www.ClinicalTrials.gov ).

[Assessment of erythropoietin treatment in preterm newborns older than 30 weeks of gestation]

BACKGROUND

Human recombinant erythropoietin (rhEPO) has shown a benefit in reducing the number of transfusions in very-low-birth-weight infants. However, no study has reported benefits in older preterms (i.e., 30-32 weeks of gestation [WG]). This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of rhEPO between 30 and 32 WG.

METHODS

Two groups of preterms between 30 and 32 WG were compared in a retrospective study: period 1 with rhEPO (January 2005 to October 2006) and period 2 without rhEPO (November 2006 to May 2007). Newborns with intra-uterine growth retardation, rhesus isoimmunization or surgical procedures were excluded. The main criterion was the number of blood transfusions; the second criterion was hemoglobin at 2, 4 and 6 weeks of life. Morbidity was evaluated on necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine newborns receiving rhEPO and 19 not receiving rhEPO (controls) were included. The two groups were similar for birth weight (p=0.06) and hemoglobin at birth (p=0.41). Only one child (rhEPO group) needed a transfusion. Hemoglobin at 2 weeks (p=0.74), 4 weeks (p=0.13) and 6 weeks (p=0.35) were not statistically different. There was no difference between the 2 groups for necrotizing enterocolitis, IVH or periventricular leukomalacia.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find any benefit using rhEPO in 30 to 32 WG preterm infants in terms of the number of transfusions or hemoglobin levels.