1
|
Balgobind BV, Visser J, Grehn M, Marquard Knap M, de Ruysscher D, Levis M, Alcantara P, Boda-Heggemann J, Both M, Cozzi S, Cvek J, Dieleman EMT, Elicin O, Giaj-Levra N, Jumeau R, Krug D, Algara López M, Mayinger M, Mehrhof F, Miszczyk M, Pérez-Calatayud MJ, van der Pol LHG, van der Toorn PP, Vitolo V, Postema PG, Pruvot E, Verhoeff JC, Blanck O. Refining critical structure contouring in STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR): Benchmark results and consensus guidelines from the STOPSTORM.eu consortium. Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109949. [PMID: 37827279 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT), STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) shows promising results. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonise STAR treatment in Europe. The primary goals of this benchmark study were to standardise contouring of organs at risk (OAR) for STAR, including detailed substructures of the heart, and accredit each participating centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS Centres within the STOPSTORM.eu consortium were asked to delineate 31 OAR in three STAR cases. Delineation was reviewed by the consortium expert panel and after a dedicated workshop feedback and accreditation was provided to all participants. Further quantitative analysis was performed by calculating DICE similarity coefficients (DSC), median distance to agreement (MDA), and 95th percentile distance to agreement (HD95). RESULTS Twenty centres participated in this study. Based on DSC, MDA and HD95, the delineations of well-known OAR in radiotherapy were similar, such as lungs (median DSC = 0.96, median MDA = 0.1 mm and median HD95 = 1.1 mm) and aorta (median DSC = 0.90, median MDA = 0.1 mm and median HD95 = 1.5 mm). Some centres did not include the gastro-oesophageal junction, leading to differences in stomach and oesophagus delineations. For cardiac substructures, such as chambers (median DSC = 0.83, median MDA = 0.2 mm and median HD95 = 0.5 mm), valves (median DSC = 0.16, median MDA = 4.6 mm and median HD95 = 16.0 mm), coronary arteries (median DSC = 0.4, median MDA = 0.7 mm and median HD95 = 8.3 mm) and the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes (median DSC = 0.29, median MDA = 4.4 mm and median HD95 = 11.4 mm), deviations between centres occurred more frequently. After the dedicated workshop all centres were accredited and contouring consensus guidelines for STAR were established. CONCLUSION This STOPSTORM multi-centre critical structure contouring benchmark study showed high agreement for standard radiotherapy OAR. However, for cardiac substructures larger disagreement in contouring occurred, which may have significant impact on STAR treatment planning and dosimetry evaluation. To standardize OAR contouring, consensus guidelines for critical structure contouring in STAR were established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian V Balgobind
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jorrit Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Melanie Grehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Pino Alcantara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Faculty of Medicine, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marcus Both
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jakub Cvek
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Edith M T Dieleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Raphaël Jumeau
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Manuel Algara López
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Felix Mehrhof
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | | | - Luuk H G van der Pol
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Viviana Vitolo
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Pieter G Postema
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Etienne Pruvot
- Heart and Vessel Department, Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Joost C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Pol LHG, Hackett SL, Hoesein FAAM, Snoeren LMW, Pomp J, Raaymakers BW, Verhoeff JJC, Fast MF. On the feasibility of cardiac substructure sparing in magnetic resonance imaging guided stereotactic lung radiotherapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:397-409. [PMID: 36210631 PMCID: PMC10092491 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has proven an effective treatment for medically inoperable lung tumors, even for (ultra-)central tumors. Recently, there has been growing interest in radiation-induced cardiac toxicity in lung radiotherapy. More specifically, dose to cardiac (sub-)structures (CS) was found to correlate with survival after radiotherapy. PURPOSE Our goal is first, to investigate the percentage of patients who require CS sparing in an magnetic resonance imaging guided lung SBRT workflow, and second, to quantify how successful implementation of cardiac sparing would be. METHODS The patient cohort consists of 34 patients with stage II-IV lung cancer who were treated with SBRT between 2017 and 2020. A mid-position computed tomography (CT) image was used to create treatment plans for the 1.5 T Unity MR-linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) following clinical templates. Under guidance of a cardio-thoracic radiologist, 11 CS were contoured manually for each patient. Dose constraints for five CS were extracted from the literature. Patients were stratified according to their need for cardiac sparing depending on the CS dose in their non-CS constrained MR-linac treatment plans. Cardiac sparing treatment plans (CSPs) were then created and dosimetrically compared with their non-CS constrained treatment plan counterparts. CSPs complied with the departmental constraints and were considered successful when fulfilling all CS constraints, and partially successful if some CS constraints could be fulfilled. Predictors for the need for and feasibility of cardiac sparing were explored, specifically planning target volume (PTV) size, cranio-caudal (CC) distance, 3D distance, and in-field overlap volume histograms (iOVH). RESULTS 47% of the patients (16 out of 34) were in need of cardiac sparing. A successful CSP could be created for 62.5% (10 out of 16) of these patients. Partially successful CSPs still complied with two to four CS constraints. No significant difference in dose to organs at risk (OARs) or targets was identified between CSPs and the corresponding non-CS constrained MR-linac plans. The need for cardiac sparing was found to correlate with distance in the CC direction between target and all of the individual CS (Mann-Whitney U-test p-values <10-6 ). iOVHs revealed that complying with dose constraints for CS is primarily determined by in-plane distance and secondarily by PTV size. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that CS can be successfully spared in lung SBRT on the MR-linac for most of this patient cohort, without compromising doses to the tumor or to other OARs. CC distance between the target and CS can be used to predict the need for cardiac sparing. iOVHs, in combination with PTV size, can be used to predict if cardiac sparing will be successful for all constrained CS except the left ventricle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luuk H G van der Pol
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sara L Hackett
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Louk M W Snoeren
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Pomp
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin F Fast
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|