1
|
Sequeira SB, Sequeira LM, Wieland MD, Imbergamo CM, Tepper K. No difference in load to failure or stiffness between transosseous tunnels, suture anchors, and cortical buttons for pectoralis major tendon repair: a systematic review & meta-analysis. J Exp Orthop 2023; 10:56. [PMID: 37233834 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00617-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical options for pectoralis major tendon tears include primary repair, though there is no consensus as to which constructs are biomechanically superior for repair. METHODS A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Embase using PRISMA guidelines to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of bone tunnels (BT), cortical buttons (CB) and suture anchors (SA) techniques for pectoralis major tendon repair. The search phrase implemented was 'pectoralis major tendon repair biomechanics'. Studies that did not evaluate biomechanical outcome data, evaluated partial pectoralis major tendon tears, and non-English articles were excluded. Evaluated outcomes included ultimate load to failure (N) and stiffness (N/mm). RESULTS Six studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 124 cadaveric specimens, for pectoralis major tendon repair comparing BT with SA and CB. Pooled analysis from four studies reporting on ultimate load to failure between BT and SA failed to reveal a difference between BT and SA (p = 0.489). Pooled analysis from two studies reporting on stiffness failed to reveal a difference in favor of BT compared to SA (p = 0.705). Pooled analysis from four studies reporting on ultimate load to failure between BT and CB failed to reveal a difference between BT and CB (p = 0.567). Pooled analysis from two studies reporting on stiffness failed to reveal a difference in favor of BT compared to CB (p = 0.701). CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in load to failure or stiffness when using BT, CB, or SA in pectoralis major tendon repairs. This review reveals that clinical outcomes may better inform which fixation construct to implement in pectoralis major tendon repairs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean B Sequeira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, 3333 North Calvert, Street, Suite 400, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
| | - Lynette M Sequeira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, 3333 North Calvert, Street, Suite 400, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Mark D Wieland
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, 3333 North Calvert, Street, Suite 400, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Casey M Imbergamo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, 3333 North Calvert, Street, Suite 400, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Kenneth Tepper
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, 3333 North Calvert, Street, Suite 400, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahmad AI, Lee A, Caplan C, Wikholm C, Pothoulakis I, Almothafer Z, Raval N, Marshall S, Mishra A, Hodgins N, Kang IG, Chang RK, Dailey Z, Daneshmand A, Kapadia A, Oh JH, Rodriguez B, Sehgal A, Sweeney M, Swisher CB, Childers DF, O'Connor C, Sequeira LM, Cho W. Gastric intestinal metaplasia development in African American predominant United States population. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:597-607. [PMID: 36303812 PMCID: PMC9593516 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i10.597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer significantly contributes to cancer mortality globally. Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a stage in the Correa cascade and a premalignant lesion of gastric cancer. The natural history of GIM formation and progression over time is not fully understood. Currently, there are no clear guidelines on GIM surveillance or management in the United States.
AIM To investigate factors associated with GIM development over time in African American-predominant study population.
METHODS This is a retrospective longitudinal study in a single tertiary hospital in Washington DC. We retrieved upper esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) with gastric biopsies from the pathology department database from January 2015 to December 2020. Patients included in the study had undergone two or more EGDs with gastric biopsy. Patients with no GIM at baseline were followed up until they developed GIM or until the last available EGD. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients age < 18, pregnancy, previous diagnosis of gastric cancer, and missing data including pathology results or endoscopy reports. The study population was divided into two groups based on GIM status. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard induced by patient demographics, EGD findings, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status on the GIM status.
RESULTS Of 2375 patients who had at least 1 EGD with gastric biopsy, 579 patients were included in the study. 138 patients developed GIM during the study follow-up period of 1087 d on average, compared to 857 d in patients without GIM (P = 0.247). The average age of GIM group was 64 years compared to 56 years in the non-GIM group (P < 0.001). In the GIM group, adding one year to the age increases the risk for GIM formation by 4% (P < 0.001). Over time, African Americans, Hispanic, and other ethnicities/races had an increased risk of GIM compared to Caucasians with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.12 (1.16, 3.87), 2.79 (1.09, 7.13), and 3.19 (1.5, 6.76) respectively. No gender difference was observed between the study populations. Gastritis was associated with an increased risk for GIM development with an HR of 1.62 (1.07, 2.44). On the other hand, H. pylori infection did not increase the risk for GIM.
CONCLUSION An increase in age and non-Caucasian race/ethnicity are associated with an increased risk of GIM formation. The effect of H. pylori on GIM is limited in low prevalence areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akram I Ahmad
- Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, United States
| | - Arielle Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Claire Caplan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Colin Wikholm
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Ioannis Pothoulakis
- Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, United States
| | - Zaynab Almothafer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Nishtha Raval
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Samantha Marshall
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Ankit Mishra
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Nicole Hodgins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - In Guk Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Raymond K Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Zachary Dailey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Arvin Daneshmand
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Anjani Kapadia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Jae Hak Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Brittney Rodriguez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Abhinav Sehgal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Matthew Sweeney
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Christopher B Swisher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Daniel F Childers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Corinne O'Connor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Lynette M Sequeira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
| | - Won Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007, United States
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, INOVA Medical System, Leesburg, VA 20176, United States
| |
Collapse
|