Macrophage phenotype is determinant for fibrosis development in keloid disease

Keloid refers to a fibroproliferative disorder characterized by an accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) components at the dermis level, overgrowth beyond initial wound, and formation of tumor-like nodule areas. Treating keloid is still an unmet clinical need and the lack of an efficient therapy is clearly related to limited knowledge about keloid etiology, despite the growing interest of the scientific community in this pathology. In past decades, keloids were often studied in vitro through the sole prism of fibroblasts considered as the major effector of ECM deposition. Nevertheless, development of keloids results from cross-interactions of keloid fibroblasts (KFs) and their surrounding microenvironment, including immune cells such as macrophages. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of M1 and M2 monocyte-derived macrophages on KFs in vitro. We focused on the effects of the macrophage secretome on fibrosis-related criteria in KFs, including proliferation, migration, differentiation, and ECM synthesis. First, we demonstrated that M2-like macrophages enhanced the fibrogenic profile of KFs in culture. Then, we surprisingly founded that M1-like macrophages can have an anti-fibrogenic effect on KFs, even in a pro-fibrotic environment. These results demonstrate, for the first time, that M1 and M2 macrophage subsets differentially impact the fibrotic fate of KFs in vitro, and suggest that restoring the M1/M2 balance to favor M1 in keloids could be an efficient therapeutic lever to prevent or treat keloid fibrosis.

Human primary neutrophil mRNA does not contaminate human resolving macrophage mRNA after efferocytosis

The ingestion of apoptotic corpses by macrophages, a process called efferocytosis, is a crucial step in inflammation resolution, since it alters macrophage phenotype toward a pro-resolving profile to foil inflammation and to favor tissue repair. Up to now, the resolving macrophages remain poorly characterized, especially in humans. Global investigations, like RNA sequencing, would be very helpful to unravel some features of these elusive cells. Nonetheless, these inquiries may be challenging in a single-species model, since the fate of ingested mRNA remains unknown and may hinder any subsequent mRNA investigations in the phagocyte. A full human model consisting of primary human neutrophil and primary human monocyte-derived macrophage co-culture was set up several decades ago to mimic in vitro the efferocytosis process. However, to our knowledge, this model has not been characterized as a suitable model to perform global mRNA investigations. Indeed, the extent of ingested neutrophil mRNA contamination has not been assessed in resolving macrophages. This work answers to this crucial question. Indeed, based on the protocols presented in this article, we demonstrate that neutrophil mRNA is severely degraded and is not able to cross-contaminate resolving macrophage mRNA, contrary to apoptotic human peripheral blood derived mononuclear cell (PBMC) or apoptotic leukemic Jurkat cell mRNA. Moreover, this allogenic co-culture system does not favor neither neutrophil activation nor macrophage pro-inflammatory cytokine release. Collectively, we highlight that this model of primary human neutrophil and primary human monocyte-derived macrophage co-culture is the best model for mRNA investigations in human resolving macrophages to help improving our knowledge on these crucial cells.