Which factors are associated with trainees' confidence in performing obstetric and gynecological ultrasound examinations?

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between clinical training characteristics and trainees' level of confidence in performing ultrasound scans independently.

METHODS

A cross-sectional e-survey was distributed to members of the national societies of junior obstetricians/gynecologists in Denmark, Sweden and Norway (n = 973). Multiple linear regression models were used to explore the effect that amount of time spent in specialized ultrasound units and clinical experience had on trainees' confidence in performing ultrasonography independently. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify factors that contributed to trainees' confidence in performing ultrasonography. Trainees' ultrasound confidence was finally compared with their expected levels of performance.

RESULTS

Of the 682 respondents (response rate 70.1%), 621 met the inclusion criteria. Clinical experience and time spent in specialized ultrasound units were predictors of trainees' confidence in performing ultrasonography independently (P < 0.001). Trainees required more than 24 months of clinical experience and 12-24 days of training in specialized ultrasound units in order to feel confident about performing transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound scans independently. Three factors were related to ultrasound confidence: technical aspects, image perception and integration of scan into patient care. There were significant differences between trainees' level of confidence and their expected levels of performance (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical experience and time spent in specialized ultrasound units were predictors of trainees' confidence in performing ultrasonography independently. Discrepancies between trainees' confidence and their expected levels of performance raised concerns about the adequacy of current ultrasound training programs.

Assessment of Advanced Life Support competence when combining different test methods—Reliability and validity

Robust assessment of Advanced Life Support (ALS) competence is paramount to the credibility of ALS-provider certification and for estimating the learning outcome and retention of ALS competence following the courses. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) provides two sets of MCQs and four Cardiac Arrest Simulation Test (CASTest) scenarios for the assessments according to guidelines 2005.

AIMS

To analyse the reliability and validity of the individual sub-tests provided by ERC and to find a combination of MCQ and CASTest that provides a reliable and valid single effect measure of ALS competence.

METHODS

Two groups of participants were included in this randomised, controlled experimental study: a group of newly graduated doctors, who had not taken the ALS course (N=17) and a group of students, who had passed the ALS course 9 months before the study (N=16). Reliability in terms of inter-rater agreement and generalisability across skills scenarios were estimated. Validity was studied in terms of equality of test difficulty and ability to discriminate performance between the groups.

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement on checklist scores were generally high, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients between 0.766 and 0.977. Inter-rater agreements on pass/fail decisions were not perfect. The one MCQ test was significantly more difficult than the other. There were no significant differences between CASTests. Generalisability theory was use to identify a composite of MCQ and CASTest scenarios that possessed high reliability, equality of test sets, and ability to discriminate between the two groups of supposedly different ALS competence.

CONCLUSIONS

ERC sub-tests of ALS competence possess sufficient reliability and validity. A combined ALS score with equal weighting of one MCQ and one CASTest can be used as a single measurement of ALS competence.

[Dopa-responsive dystonia of childhood]

A case story of dopa-responsive childhood dystonia is presented. The symptoms, diagnostics, pitfalls and treatment are discussed.

[Cost-benefit analysis of electric stimulation of the spinal cord in the treatment of angina pectoris]

Since August 1988, in Odense Hospital, electric spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been employed for the treatment of pain in patients with confirmed ischaemic heart disease who suffer from incapacitating angina pectoris despite maximal medical/surgical treatment. The object of the present investigation was to assess not only the social economic consequences of SCS treatment (cost-utility analysis) but also altered quality of life in SCS patients (perception of pain, mobility, function in daily life and physical activity). Sixteen consecutive SCS patients all of whom were resident in the County of Funen and who were submitted to implantation of an SCS system during the period August 1988 to December 1989, participated in this investigation. The results are based on data from the year prior to SCS implantation compared with the subsequent time with SCS treatment. Saving was found at hospital level (reduction in number of admissions) og 40,200 Danish crowns/annum/patient (approximately IJ 3,000) (1989 prices), and for non-hospital related expenses a corresponding saving of 16,289 Danish crowns/annum/patient (approximately IJ 1,600) was found mainly on account of reduction in the amount of home nursing required. The total saving was found to constitute 56,489 Danish crowns/annum/patient (approximately IJ 5,600). In addition, improvements were registered in all respects which constituted assessment of the quality of life of the patients.