Dental health care workers' response to the HIV epidemic

Random samples of Minnesota DHCWs were surveyed in late 1989 regarding HIV-related and infection control KAPs. Response rates were: dentists 69% (438/631); hygienists 73% (439/603); and assistants 56% (384/691). More than 50% of DHCWs said they did not have sufficient information to safely and effectively provide care for HIV-infected patients. Use of infection control techniques varied considerably. Parenteral injuries were relatively high, but only 5% of DHCWs believed they could have been exposed to HIV from these occurrences, and few DHCWs sought medical evaluation. Less than 45% of offices had a blood/body fluid exposure staff protocol, and few offices had a policy for HIV-infected staff. Nearly twice as many DHCWs said offices have an ethical versus a legal duty to treat HIV-infected persons. Low percentages of DHCWs believed the private practice dental office is the best place to treat HIV-infected patients, but approximately 50% said they would provide care. Twenty percent indicated that a diagnosed HIV-infected person had been seen at their office. Seventy-six percent said staff had been uncomfortable treating HIV-infected patients, 14% said staff had refused to treat, and 10% said referrals were difficult. DHCWs exhibited substantial improvements in their HIV-related KAPs compared to previous surveys. Nevertheless, additional cognitive and behavioral changes are necessary to ensure that all DHCWs provide care with the highest technical, legal, and ethical standards for all patients.

Effectiveness of dental office instrument sterilization procedures

To evaluate instrument sterilization procedures in Minnesota, biological indicators were used to monitor 406 sterilizers in 381 dental offices. Findings suggest a general improvement in instrument performance over that of a decade ago, but sterilization failure rates are still too high. Sterilizer operator errors are a major cause of sterilization failures. BIs are useful in monitoring sterilization performance only when sterilization procedures are performed consistently and competently by well-trained staff using adequately maintained equipment.

The Venturi Fluoride Saturator project

This study was conducted to determine whether Venturi Fluoride Saturator (VFS) systems could be used to fluoridate small community and school water supply systems with an acceptable level of maintenance. VFS systems were installed and operated at four school and six community well sites according to state and federal regulations and recommendations. School VFS systems were unable to maintain optimum fluoride residuals even with substantial maintenance. All six community well site VFS systems performed acceptably, with only a few short lapses. VFS system maintenance was labor intensive. Recurring problems were caused by lengthy equipment delivery delays, the unavailability of timely technical assistance to support the VFS system, and the inadequate quality of VFS equipment and design. Based upon these findings, further expansion of the use of VFS systems either for community or school fluoridation cannot be recommended. Additional study of and improvements in the VFS system are indicated. Three major recommendations appear appropriate: (1) extensive laboratory testing of the VFS system concept under controlled conditions should be performed to determine the functioning parameters of this equipment under different hydrodynamic conditions; (2) additional research and development of the VFS unit to improve the quality of operations and the quality control of manufacturing and assembly should be undertaken; and (3) a VFS equipment distribution network should be developed, with sufficient logistical and technical support to supply equipment parts and expertise for installation, monitoring, and maintenance in a timely and efficient manner.