Prenatal surgery in fetal myelomeningocele with severe ventriculomegaly

OBJECTIVES

Prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair is performed to decrease risk for treatment of hydrocephalus after birth and to preserve motor function. Some centers may not consider patients candidates for surgery if severe ventriculomegaly is present and there is no expected benefit in decreased risk for hydrocephalus treatment. This study sought to compare postnatal outcomes of fetuses with MMC and severe ventriculomegaly (>15mm) who underwent prenatal repair, with fetuses with severe ventriculomegaly who underwent postnatal repair and fetuses with ventriculomegaly (<15mm) who underwent prenatal repair.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of fetuses with MMC that underwent prenatal or postnatal repair between 2012 and 2021 at a single institution. The cohort was divided based on preoperative fetal ventricular size into two groups, those with severe ventriculomegaly (≥15 mm) and those without severe ventriculomegaly (<15 mm). Fetal ventricular size was measured by MRI prior to surgery using the standardized approach and the mean of the left and right ventricle was used for analysis. Motor function of lower extremities was assessed at the time of referral by ultrasound and if flexion-extension movements of the ankle were seen, it was considered as preserved S1 motor function. Postnatal outcomes including motor function of lower extremities assessed at birth and need for diversion procedure for hydrocephalus treatment during the first year of life were collected and compared between groups. Data was presented as median and range or number and percentages as appropriate. P value >0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

154 patients were included in this study: 145 patients underwent fetal surgery (101 fetoscopic and 44 open hysterotomy) and 9 patients with severe ventriculomegaly underwent postnatal repair. Among the 145 patients who underwent fetal surgery, 22 presented with severe ventriculomegaly. Prenatally repaired fetuses with severe ventriculomegaly at referral were at a significantly higher need for hydrocephalus treatment by 12 months than those without severe ventriculomegaly (62% vs. 29%, p<0.01). However, motor function assessment at birth was similar between both prenatally repaired groups (OR=0.92, 95% CI [0.33-2.59], p=0.88) adjusted for the anatomical level of the lesion. The prenatally repaired group with severe ventriculomegaly had better preserved motor function levels at birth compared to the postnatal repair group with severe ventriculomegaly (L3 with 11.1% S1 motor function; p=<0.01 and p=<0.01). Prenatally repaired patients with severe ventriculomegaly had an 18.9 times chance of having an intact motor function at birth [95% CI (1.2 - 290.1)] adjusted for ethnicity, presence of clubfeet at referral, and gestational age at delivery compared to postnatal repair. There was not a significant difference in the need for hydrocephalus treatment in the first year of life between prenatal and postnatal repair of patients with severe ventriculomegaly (61.9% vs 87.5%, p=0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Although fetuses with MMC and severe ventriculomegaly do not seem to benefit from fetal surgery in terms of postnatal hydrocephalus treatment, they benefit from increased chance of preserved motor function at birth. Results from this study highlight the benefits of having prenatal MMC repair for cases with severe ventriculomegaly at referral to preserve motor function. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.