[Sevoflurane and the nervous system]

During sevoflurane anaesthesia cerebral blood flow is preserved or slightly decreased. Cerebral oxygen consumption is reduced to 50% under 1 MAC sevoflurane. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow and responsiveness of cerebral blood flow to changes in Pa CO2 are widely preserved. Sevoflurane produces a dose dependent increase in intracranial pressure and a decrease in cerebrovascular resistance that can not be observed under hypocapnic conditions. Central stimulus processing, the electroencephalogram and sensory evoked potentials are suppressed under sevoflurane in a dose dependent fashion. The electrophysiological data indicate that intraoperative awareness phenomena should be suppressed with sevoflurane 1.5-2.0 vol.%. Recovery of cognitive and psychomotor functions seems to be faster and more complete after sevoflurane than after isoflurane anaesthesia. In inducing seizure like EEG or muscle activity, sevoflurane seems to be comparable with isoflurane. There is no limitation of sevoflurane use in patients with concomitant psychiatric or neurological diseases, and sevoflurane may be valuable addition in neurosurgery or carotid surgery.

[Quality of pain management in preclinical care of acutely ill patients]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of pain management in prehospital emergency care and to get more information about the administration of analgesics in prehospital patients.

METHODS

Patients with painful diseases or injuries who had been brought to Munich hospital's were included in the study. Immediately after having reached the hospitals' emergency department, they were evaluated using a 101-point visual analogue scale for the severity of pain at four predefined periods. Information about the patient, the diagnosis, and the analgesic treatment used by the emergency teams were drawn from the patient's chart.

RESULTS

A total of 462 patients were included in the study. The mean pain score on arrival of the emergency team was 64 points; 36.5% of the patients were treated with analgesics. In 28.1% the emergency team tried to reduce pain through external measures (i.e., setting of fractures). In 35.3% there was no therapeutic intervention. In cases in which analgesic therapy was initiated, a definite reduction in pain was achieved during emergency care. Visual analogue scores decreased from 70 points at the beginning to 29 points at arrival to the hospital's emergency department. Analgesics were most frequently used for patients with cardiopulmonary diseases (47.2%), followed by patients with traumatic accidents (35.5%) and patients with acute abdominal pain (25.2%). Of the analgesics, opioids were given most frequently (87.0%). Nonopioid analgesic agents were used in 32.1%. The results of our investigation demonstrate that in many cases the administration of analgesics is not individualized to the patients needs.

CONCLUSION

During the prehospital period of emergency care many patients suffer from severe pain. The development of patient-oriented concepts concerning pain management could contribute to improvement of pain therapy in prehospital emergency medicine.